This paper reviews the factors which have driven changes in undergraduate education in psychiatry since the 1993 publication of “Tomorrow's Doctors”,1 after which it describes current undergraduate curricula in the four Scottish medical schools teaching clinical psychiatry. Reasons underlying the differences between curricula are discussed. The authors suggest that research in medical education, alongside communication and debate between medical schools and across specialties, would lead to more uniform and evidence-based curricula.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
General Medical Council.Tomorrow's Doctors.London: General Medical Council, 1993.
2.
ReesM.Who wants a career in academic medicine?BMJ1997; 315: 74.
3.
Scottish Deans’ Medical Curriculum Group.The Scottish Doctor.Edinburgh: Scottish Deans’ Medical Curriculum Group, 2002.
4.
CrispA.Psychiatric contributions to the undergraduate medical curriculum. Psychiatr Bull R Coll Psychiatr1994; 18: 257–259.
5.
World Psychiatric Association.Core curriculum in psychiatry for medical students. Med Educ1999; 33: 204–211.
6.
SenskyT.The place of the psychiatrist in the new undergraduate medical curriculumPsychiatr Bull R Coll Psychiatr1994; 18: 557–559.
7.
NasserM.Psychiatry: a core curriculum for undergraduate medical students. Psychiatr Bull R Coll Psychiatr1996; 20: 230–233.
8.
Royal College Of Psychiatrists.Core psychiatry for tomorrow's doctors. Psychiatr Bull R Coll Psychiatr1997; 21: 522–524.
9.
RingH, MumfordD, KatonaC.Psychiatry in the new undergraduate curriculum. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment1999; 5: 415–419.
10.
AhmedO.The future of medical education and teaching: a psychiatric perspective. Am J Psychiatry1997; 154(6S) Supplement: 77–85.
11.
SharpeM, GuthrieE, PevelerR.The psychological care of medical patients: a challenge for undergraduate medical education. J R Coll Physicians Lond1996; 30: 202–204.
McParlandM, NobleLM, LivingstonG.The effectiveness of problem-based learning compared to traditional teaching in undergraduate psychiatry. Med Educ2004; 38: 859–867.
14.
AdamoG.Simulated and standardised patients in OSCEs: achievements and challenges 1992-2003. Med Teach2003; 25: 262–270.
15.
KassebaumDG, EaglenRH.Shortcomings in the evaluation of students’ clinical skills and behaviors in medical school. Acad Med1999; 74: 842–849.
16.
JollyB.Assessment and examination. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment1999; 5: 405–414.
17.
BarzanskiB, EtzelSI.Educational programs in US medical schools, 2003-2004. JAMA2004; 292: 1025–1031.
18.
SwansonDB, NormanGR, LinnRL.Performance-based assessment: lessons learnt from the health professions. Educational Research1995; 24: 5–11.
19.
WassV, Van der VleutenC, ShatzerJ.Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet2001; 357: 945–949.
20.
WilkinsonTJ.Frampton CM. Comprehensive undergraduate medical assessments improve prediction of clinical performance. Med Educ2004; 38: 1111–1116.
21.
SegouinC, HodgesB.Educating doctors in France and Canada: are the differences based on evidence or history?Med Educ2005; 39: 1205–1212.
22.
Scottish Executive.The Response of the Scottish Executive to the recommendations of the Review of Basic Medical Education in Scotland.Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, 2005.
