Abstract
Two indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assays, two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs)and the carbon immunoassay (CIA) for determination of antibodies to Encephalitozoon cuniculi were compared using 210 sera of rabbits, 135 of which originated from seven infected colonies, while 75 originated from four uninfected colonies. There was no evidence of a difference between the different assays with respect to the number of positive sera. There was a clear correlation between the quantitative response measured by IIF and CIA and the other assays, and between both IIF tests, while no such correlation was found in the quantitative response measured by ELISAs, which might be explained by the less quantitative nature of the ELISA. Therefore quantitative determination of antibodies to E. cuniculi should be performed by IIF and not by ELISA. The nosographic sensitivities N 1 and specificities N 2 of the assays were ≥ 0.94 and ≥ 0.97 respectively. Small differences in N 1 and N 2 between the assays, although not statistically significant, were responsible for differences in the calculated predictive values of a positive test and of a negative test. As expected, the magnitude of these differences depended on the fraction of positive sera sampled from a given colony. There was strong evidence of such a difference between the fraction of positive sera found in different colonies, but the sample size from some colonies was too small to allow any conclusion, whether this was due to differences in the prevalences of the infection in the colonies or something else. We conclude that any of the assays will be suitable for the routine health monitoring of laboratory rabbit colonies for E. cuniculi infection, as recommended by the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations.