Generic approach for deriving reliability and maintenance requirements through consideration of in-context customer objectives

Abstract

Not all implementations of reliability are equally effective at providing customer and user benefit. Random system failure with no prior warning or failure accommodation will have an immediate, usually adverse impact on operation. Nevertheless, this approach to reliability, implicit in measurements such as failure rate and mean time between failures, is widely assumed without consideration of potential benefits of proactive maintenance. Similarly, it is easy to assume that improved maintainability is always a good thing. However, maintainability is only one option available to reduce the cost of ownership and reduce the impact of failure. This paper discusses a process for deriving optimized reliability and maintenance requirements through consideration of in-context customer objectives rather than a product in isolation.

Keywords

reliability and maintenance requirements customer requirements technical metrics customer objectives failure avoidance failure anticipation failure accommodation delaying maintenance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jones

J. A

Warrington

Davis

‘The use of a discrete event simulation to model the achievement of maintenance free operating time for aerospace systems’. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Reliability & maintainability, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 22–25 January 2001, pp. 170–175 (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey).

Vintr

‘Optimization of reliability requirements from manufacturer's point of view’. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Reliability & maintainability, Washington DC, 18–21 January 1999, pp. 183–189 (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey).

Hockley

C. J

Appleton

D. P

‘Setting the requirements for the Royal Air Force's Next Generation Aircraft’. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Reliability & maintainability, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 13–16 January 1997, pp. 44–79 (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey).

Jones

J. A

Warrington

Davis

‘Modelling of maintenance, within discrete event simulation’. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Reliability & maintainability, Seattle, Washington, 28–31 January 2002, pp. 260–265 (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey).

Velle

QFD handbook (New York, New Jersey: Wiley 1998)

Tan

M. C

Neo

T.-K

‘QFD implementation in a discrete semiconductor industry’. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Reliability & maintainability, Seattle, Washington, 28–31 January 2002, pp. 484–489 (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey).

Sobek

D. K.

‘A set-based model of design’

Mech. Engng 118 (7) (1996): 78–81

Ward

Liker

J. K

Cristiano

Sobek

J. D. K.

‘The second Toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster’

Sloan Mgmt Revi. 36 (3) (Spring 1995): 43–61