Marine archaeology beyond the capabilities of scuba divers is a technologically enabled field. The tool suite includes ship-based systems such as towed side-scan sonars and remotely operated vehicles, and more recently free-swimming autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). Each of these platforms has various imaging and mapping capabilities appropriate for specific scales and tasks. Broadly speaking, AUVs are becoming effective tools for locating, identifying, and surveying archaeological sites. This paper discusses the role of AUVs in this suite of tools, outlines some specific design criteria necessary to maximize their utility in the field, and presents directions for future developments. Results are presented for a recent joint AUV—towed system survey and a demonstration of current mine-hunting technologies applied to archaeology.
HenthornR.CaressD. W.ThomasH.Mc-EwenR.KirkwoodW. J.PaullC. K.KeatenR.High-resolution multibeam and subbottom surveys of submarine canyons, deep-sea fan channels, and gas seeps using the MBARI mapping AUV. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′06 MTS/IEEE Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 18–22 September 2006, pp. 1–6 (IEEE, New York).
2.
KirkwoodW. J.CaressD. W.ThomasH.SibenacM.McEwenR.ShaneF.HenthornR.McGillP.Mapping payload development for MBARI's Dorado-class AUVs. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′04 MTS/IEEE TECHNO-OCEAN ′04 Conference, Kobe, Japan, 9–12 November 2004, vol. 3, pp. 1580–1585 (IEEE, New York).
3.
YoergrD. R.BradleyA.CormierM. H.RyanW. B. F.Fine-scale seafloor survey in rugged deep-ocean terrain with an autonomous robot. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and automation, 2000, pp. 1787–1792 (IEEE, New York).
4.
JakubaM. V.YoergerD. R.High-resolution multibeam sonar mapping with the Autonomous Benthic Explorer (ABE). In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Unmanned untethered submersible technology (UUST 2003), Durham, New Hampshire, USA, 24–27 August 2003, pp. 1–15 (Autonomous Undersea Systems Institute, Lee, New Hampshire).
5.
YoergerD. R.KelleyD. S.DelaneyJ. R.Fine-scale three-dimensional mapping of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent site using the Jason ROV system. Int. J. Robotics Res., 2000, 19, 1000–1014.
6.
YoergerD. R.JakubaM.BradleyA. M.BinghamB.Techniques for deep sea near bottom survey using an autonomous underwater vehicle. Int. J. Robotics Res., 2007, 26(1), 41–54.
7.
FerriniV.FronariD.ShankT.TiveyKinsey M.SouleA.CarbotteS. M.WhitcombL. L.YoergerD.HowlandJ.Submeter bathymetric mapping of volcanic and hydrothermal features on the East Pacific Rise crest at 9° 50′ N. Geochem., Geophys., Geosystems, 2007, 8(1), QO 1006, 33 pp.
8.
KnaapenM. A. F.van BergenHenegouw C. N.HuY. Y.Quantifying bedform migration using multi-beam sonar. J. Geo-Mar. Lett., 2005, 25(5), 306–314.
9.
FoleyB. P.DellaPortaK.SakellariouD.BinghamB. S.CamilliR.EusticeR. M.EvagelistisD.FerriniV. L.KatsarosK.KourkoumelisD.MichaMallios P.MindellD. A.RomanC. N.SinghH.SwitzerD. S.TheodoulouT.The 2005 Chios Ancient Shipwreck Survey: New methods for underwater archaeology. Hesperia, 2009, 78, 269–305.
10.
SinghH.WhitcombL. L.YoergerD. R.PizarroO.Microbathymetric mapping from underwater vehicles in the deep ocean. Comput. Vision Image Understanding, 2000, 79(1), 143–161.
11.
WarrenD.ChurchR. A.EslingerK. L.Deepwater archaeology with autonomous underwater vehicle technology. In Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference (OTC ′07), Houston, Texas, USA, 30 April-3 May 2007, paper OTC 1 8841, pp. 1–11 (Offshore Technology Conference, Richardson, Texas).
12.
DessetS.DamusR.MorashJ.BechazC.Use of GIBs in AUVs for underwater archaeology. Sea Technol., 2003, 44(120), 22–27.
13.
BinghamD.DrakeT.HillA.LottR.The application of autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) technology in the oil industry - vision and experiences. In Proceedings of the FIG XXII International Congress, Washington, DC, USA, 19–26 April 2002, TS4.4 Hydrographic Surveying II, p. 13 (International Federation of Surveyors, Copenhagen).
14.
WilsonM.O'ConnellB.BrownC.GuinanJ.GrehanA. J.Multiscale terrain analysis of multibeam bathymetry data for habitat mapping on the continental slope. Mar. Geodesy, 2007, 30(1-2), 3–35.
15.
BlondelP.A review of acoustic techniques for habitat mapping. Hydroacoustics, 2008, 11, 29–38.
16.
ClarkeM. E.TolimieriN.SinghH.Using the seabed AUV to assess populations of groundfish in untrawlable areas. In In The future of fisheries science in North America (Eds BeamishR. J.RothschildB. J.), Fish and Fisheries Series, 2009, pp. 357–372 (Springer Science Business Media, Berlin).
17.
WilkinsonJ.WadhamP.Modelling the flow of oil under sea ice: a role for the AUV. In Proceedings of the IEEE/OES Workshop on Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV 2008), Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA, 13–14 October 2008, pp. 1–5 (IEEE, New York).
18.
DobleJ.WadhamP.Experiences from two-years through-ice deployments in the high Arctic. In Proceedings of the IEEE/OES Workshop on Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV 2008), Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA, 13–14 October 2008, pp. 1–7 (IEEE, New York).
19.
KimballP.RockS.Sonar-based iceberg-relative AUV navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/OES Workshop on Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV 2008), Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA, 13–14 October 2008, pp. 1–6 (IEEE, New York).
20.
MindellD. A.CroffK.Deep water, archaeology and technology development. Mar. Technol. Soc. J., 2002, 36(3), 13–20.
21.
NOAA.Ocean Explorer, AUVfest 2008: Navy mine-hunting robots help NOAA explore sunken history, Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA, 12–23 May 2008, available from http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/08auvfest/.
22.
SchifferM. B.SullivanA. P.KlingerT. C.The design of archaeological surveys. World Archaeol., 1978, 10, 1–28.
23.
AmmermanA. J.Surveys and archaeological research. A. Rev. Anthropol.1981, 10, 63–68.
24.
AlcockS. E.CherryJ. F. (Eds) Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean world2004 (Oxbow Books, Oxford).
25.
KellerD. R.RuppD. W. (Eds) Archaeological survey in the Mediterranean area, BAR International Series 155, 1983 (British Archaeological Reports, Oxford).
26.
BanningE. B.Archaeological survey2002 (Kluwer-Plenum, New York).
27.
CherryJ. F.Frogs round the pond: Perspectives on current archaeological survey projects in the Mediterranean region. In In Archaeological survey in the Mediterranean area (Eds KellerD. R.RuppD. W., BAR International Series 155, 1983, pp. 375–416 (British Archaeological Reports, Oxford).
28.
CobraD. T.OppenheimA. V.JaffeJ. S.Geometric distortions in side-scan sonar images: A procedure for their estimation and correction. IEEE J. Oceanic Engng, 1992, 17(3), 252–268.
29.
ChanceT. S.KleinerA. A.NorthcuttJ. G.The autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV): A cost effective alternative. In Integrated coastal zone management: strategies and tools (Ed. PinkA.), 2000, pp. 65–69 (ICG Publishing, London).
30.
SakellariouD.GeorgiouP.MalliosA.KapsimalisV.KourkoumelisD.MichaP.TheodoulouT.DellaportaK.Searching for ancient shipwrecks in the Aegean Sea: The discovery of Chios and Kythnos Hellenistic wrecks with the use of marine geological-geophysical methods. Int. J. Naut. Archaeol., 2007, 36(2), 365–381.
31.
ChurchR. A.WarrenD.Sound methods: The necessity of high-resolution geophysical data for planning deepwater archaeological projects. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol., 2008, 12(2), 103–119.
32.
HansenR. E.HagenP. E.TelleH.S Synthetic aperture sonar: a tool in underwater archaeology. In Proceedings of the Third Conference and Exhibition on Underwater acoustic measurements: technologies and results, Nafplion, Greece, 21–26 June 2009, pp. 1–6 (FORTH/IACM, Heraklion).
33.
HagenP. E.HansenR. E.MidtgaardØ.SAS and side scan sonar systems compared: experimental results from HUGIN AUVs. In Proceedings of the Second Conference and Exhibition on Underwater acoustic measurements: technologies and results, Crete, Greece, 25–29 June 2007, pp. 1–8 (FORTH/IACM, Heraklion).
34.
MatthewsA. D.MontgomeryT. C.CookD. A.OeschgerJ. W.StroudJ. S.12.75′ synthetic aperture sonar (SAS), high resolution and automatic target recognition. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′06 MTS/IEEE Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 18–22 September 2006, pp. 1–7 (IEEE, New York).
35.
StokeyR. P.FreitagL. E.GrundM. D.A compact control language for AUV acoustic communication. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′05 MTS/IEEE Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 19–23 September 2005, Vol.2, pp. 1133–1137 (IEEE, New York).
36.
AllenB.AustinT.ForresterN.GoldsboroughR.KukulyaA.PackardG.PurcellM.StokeyR.Autonomous docking demonstrations with enhanced REMUS technology. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′06 MTS/IEEE Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 18–22 September 2006, pp. 1–6 (IEEE, New York).
37.
McEwenR. S.HobsonB. W.McBrideL.BellinghamJ. G.Docking control system for a 54-cm diameter (21-in) AUV. IEEE J. Oceanic Engng, 2008, 33(4), 550–562.
38.
BinghamB.PrechtlE.WilsonR.Design requirements for autonomous multivehicle surface underwater operations. Mar. Technol. Soc. J., 2009, 43(2), 61–72.
39.
SchockS. G.WulfJ.QuentinG.SaraJ.Synthetic aperture processing of buried object scanning sonar data. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′05 MTS/IEEE Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 19–23 September 2005, pp. 2236–2241 (IEEE, New York).
40.
ClemT. R.Superconducting magnetic gradiometers for underwater target detection. Nav. Engrs J., 2009, 110(1), 139–149.
41.
VaizerL.LathropJ. D.BonoJ.Localization of magnetic dipole targets. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′04 MTS/IEEE TECHNO-OCEAN ′04 Conference, Kobe, Japan, 9–12 November 2004, pp. 869–873 (IEEE, New York).
42.
BallardR. (Ed.) Archaeological oceanography, 2008 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey).
43.
QuinnR.The role of scour in shipwreck site formation processes and the preservation of wreck associated scour signatures in the sedimentary record - evidence from seabed and sub-surface data. J. Archaeol. Sci., 2006, 33(10), 1419–1432.
44.
BassG. F.New techniques of archaeology and Greek shipwrecks of the sixth and fifth centuries BC. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc., 150(1), 1–14.
45.
GreenJ.MatthewsS.TuranliT.Underwater archaeological surveying using PhotoModeler, VirtualMapper: Different applications for different problems. Int. J. Naut. Archaeol., 2002, 31(2), 283–292.
46.
PulakJ.The Uluburun shipwreck: An overview. Int. J. Naut. Archaeol., 1998, 27(3) 188–224.
47.
BallardR. D.McCannA. M.YoergerD.WhitcombL.MindellD.OlesonJ.SinghH.FoleyB.AdamsJ.PicheotaD.The discovery of ancient history in the deep sea using advanced deep submergence technology. Deep Sea Res., 2000, 1(47), 1591–1620.
48.
BallardR.StagerL.MasterD D.MindellYoerger D.WhitcombL.SinghH.PiechotaD.Iron age shipwrecks in deep water off Ashkelon, Israel. Am. J. Archeol., 2002, 106(2), 151–168.
49.
FoleyB. P.MindellD. A.Precision survey and archaeological methodology in deep water. J. Hellenic Inst. Mar. Archaeol., 2002, 6, 49–56.
50.
MindellD.Precision navigation and remote sensing for underwater archaeology. In Remote sensing in archaeology (Eds WisemanJ. R.El-BazF.), 2007, pp. 499–511 (Springer, New York).
51.
ConteG.ZanoliS. M.ScaradozziD.GambellaL.CalabroV.Underwater archeology missions design for data gathering automation. In Proceedings of the 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and automation, Ajaccio, Corsica, France, 25–27 June 2008, pp. 1083–1088 (IEEE, New York).
52.
SinghH.AdamsJ.FoleyB.MindellD. A.Imaging underwater for archeology. J. Field Archaeol., 2000, 27(3), 319–328.
53.
LudvigsenM.SortlandB.JohnsenG.SinghH.Applications of geo-referenced underwater photo mosaics in marine biology and archaeology. Oceanography, 2007, 20(4), 74–83.
54.
DrapP.SeinturierJ.ScaradozziD.GambogiP.LongdL.GaucheF.Photogrammetry for virtual exploration of underwater archeological sites. In Proceedings of the XXI CIPA Symposium, Athens, Greece 1–6 October 2007, pp. 1–6 (International Scientific Committee for Documentation of Cultural Heritage).
55.
EusticeR. M.SinghH.LeonardJ. J.WalterM.R Visually mapping the RMS Titanic: conservative covariance estimates for SLAM information filters. Int. J. Robotics Res., 2006, 25(12) 1223–1242.
56.
SinghH.CanA.EusticeR.LernerS.McPheeN.PizarroO.RomanC.SeaBED AUV offers new platform for high-resolution imaging. EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Un., 2004, 85(31), 289, 294–295.
57.
StokeyR. P.RoupA.von AltC.AllenB.ForresterN.AustinT.GoldsboroughR.PurcellM.JaffreF.PackardG.KukulyaA.Development of the REMUS 600 autonomous underwater vehicle. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′05 MTS/IEEE Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 19–23 September 2005, vol.2, pp. 1301–1304 (IEEE, New York).
58.
KinseyJ. C.EusticeR. M.WhitcombL. L.A survey of underwater vehicle navigation: recent advances and new challenges. In Proceedings of the Seventh IFAC Conference on Manoeuvring and control of marine craft (MCMC ′06), Lisbon, Portugal, 20–22 September 2006, pp. 1–12 (IFAC, New York).
59.
HoltP.An assessment of quality in underwater archaeological surveys using tape measures. Int. J. Naut. Archaeol., 2003, 32(2), 246–251.
60.
AdamsJ.Alchemy or science? Compromising archaeology in the deep sea. J. Maritime Archaeol., 2007, 2(1), 48–56.
61.
WhitcombL. L.YoergerD. R.SinghHAdvances in Doppler-based navigation of underwater robotic vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and automation, Detroit, Michigan, 1999, vol. 1, pp. 399–406 (IEEE, New York).
KinseyJ. C.WhitcombL. L.In-situ calibration of attitude and Doppler sensors for precision underwater vehicle navigation: theory and experiment. IEEE J. Oceanic Engng, 2007, 32(2), 286–299.
64.
MahonI. J.WilliamsS. B.PizarroJohnson-Roberson O.Efficient view-based SLAM using visual loop closures. IEEE Trans. Robotics, 2008, 24(5), 1002–1014.
65.
EusticeR. M.PizarroO.SinghH.Visually augmented navigation for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE J. Oceanic Engng2007, 33, 103–122.
66.
PizarroO.SinghH.Toward large-area mosaicing for underwater scientific applications. IEEE J. Oceanic Engng, 2003, 28(4), 651–672.
67.
GuF.RzhanovY.Optimal image blending for underwater mosaics. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′06 MTS/IEEE Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 18–22 September 2006, pp. 1–5 (IEEE, New York).
68.
GraciasN.Santos-VictorJ.Underwater video mosaics as visual navigation maps. Comput. Vision Image Understanding, 2000, 79, 66–91.
69.
GraciasN.van der ZwaanS.BernardinoA.Santos-VictorJ.Mosaic based navigation for autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE J. Oceanic Engng2003, 28(4), 609–624.
70.
RomanC.SinghH.A self-consistent bathymetric mapping algorithm. J. Field Robotics, 2007, 24(1-2), 23–50.
71.
BarkbyS.WilliamsS. B.PizarroO.JakubaM. V.An efficient approach to bathymetric SLAM. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robots and systems, St Louis, Missouri, USA, 11–15 October 2009, pp. 219–224 (IEEE, New York).
72.
HowlandJ.FarrN.SinghH.Field test of a new camera/LED strobe system. In Proceedings of the OCEANS ′06 MTS/IEEE Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 18–22 September 2006, pp.7–4 (IEEE, New York).
73.
JaffeJ.S Computer modeling and the design of optimal underwater imaging systems. IEEE J. Oceanic Engng, 1990, 15(2), 101–111.
74.
JaffeJ. S.Multi-autonomous underwater vehicle optical imaging for extended performance. In Proceedings of the OCEANS 2007 - Europe MTS/IEEE Conference and Exhibition, Aberdeen, UK, 18–21 June 2007, pp. 1–4 (IEEE, New York).
75.
SoreideF.JasinskiM. E.Ormen Lange, Norway - the deepest dig. Int. J. Naut. Archaeol., 2008, 37(2), 380–384.
