This paper presents a simulation model that considers the radial and tangential vibrations and their abatement using active actuators in a turning process. The model is simulated using Simulink in a MATLAB environment to assess the possibility of using an active actuator to reduce vibrations in two directions. Comparison is made between the two orthogonal actuators scenario and the one inclined actuator scenario. The results indicate that vibration reduction using an active inclined actuator is comparable with that using two orthogonal actuators.
JangD. Y.SeiregA.Tool natural frequency as the control parameter for surface roughnessMach. Vibr., 1992, 1, 147–154.
2.
OberstH.Al-JumailyA. M.An active tool holder for attenuating radial and tangential vibration in a turning process. In Proceedings of 7th Annual New Zealand Engineering and Technology Postgraduate Conference, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 23-24 November 2000, pp. 77–182.
3.
KimK. J.HaJ. Y.Suppression of machine tool chatter using a viscoelastic dynamic damperTrans. ASME, 1987, 109, 58–65.
4.
NesslerG. L.BrownD. L.StoufferD. C.MaddoxK. C.Design of a viscoelastic dynamic absorber for machine tool applicationsTrans. ASME, August 1977, 620–623.
5.
StoneB. J.AndrewC.Vibration absorber for machine tool. In Proceedings of 9th International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference, 1969, pp. 645–657.
6.
ComstockT. R.TseF. S.LemonJ. R.Application of controlled mechanical impedance for reducing machine tool vibrationsJ. Engng for Industry, November 1969, 1057–1062.
TsaoT. C.TomizukaM.Robust adaptive and repetitive digital tracking control and application to a hydraulic servo for noncircular machiningTrans. ASME, J. Dynamic Syst., Measmt and Control, 1994, 116 (3), 24–32.
9.
TsaoT. C.TomizukaM.Adaptive and repetitive digital control algorithms for non-circular machining. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 1998, pp. 115–120.
10.
RojasJ.LiangC.Experimental investigation of active machine tool vibration control. Active Control Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, SPIE, Vol. 2721, 1996, pp. 373–384.
11.
HakanssonL.SturessonP. O.ClaessonI.Active control of machine-tool vibration6th International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering, Melbourne, 29 November-1 December 1995.
12.
MarraM.WalcottB. L.RouchL. E.H∞ vibration control for machining using active dynamic absorber technology. In Proceedings of American Control Conference, Vol. 1, 1995, pp. 739–794.
13.
AltintasY.Manufacturing Automation, 2000 (Cambridge University Press).
14.
ForemanE. P.M.Al-JumailyA. M.An effective control scheme for an actively controlled tool post. In Proceedings of 7th Annual New Zealand Engineering and Technology Postgraduate Conference, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 23-24 November 2000, pp. 125–128.
15.
ReedR. S.Active vibration isolation using a magnetostrictive actuator, System Engineering Department, US Naval Academy at Annapolis, technical paper,1989.
16.
MerrittH. E.Theory of self-excited machine tool chatter: Contribution to machine tool chatter research-1Trans. ASME, J. Engng for Industry, 1965, 87, 447–454.
17.
KanizarW. I.LiuD.MoonK. S.SutherlandJ. W.A magnetostrictive actuator based micropositioner and its application in turning. Department of Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics, Michigan Technological University, SPIE, Vol. 2721, 1996, pp. 385–393.
18.
EndresW. J.SutherlandR. E.DevorJ. W.KapoorS. G.A dynamic model of the cutting force system in the turning process. In Proceedings of Symposium on Monitoring and Control for Manufacturing Process, 1990, 44, 193–199.
