This article focuses on developing empirical models for tool wear and surface roughness prediction in the solid lubricant assisted turning process. Solid lubricant suspensions like graphite and boric acid in SAE 40 oil are employed in the turning of AISI 1040 (EN 8) steel. Results indicate that surface roughness is improved by reducing cutting forces and tool flank wear as compared to dry and wet machining. A comparison of predicted values from the empirical models and measured values is also carried out.
VaradarajanA. S.PhilipP. K.RamamoorthyB.‘Investigations on hard turning with minimal cutting fluid application and its comparison with dry and wet turning’Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.422 (2002): 193–200
4.
KhanM. M. A.DharN. R.‘Performance evaluation of minimum quantity lubrication by vegetable oil in terms of cutting force, cutting zone temperature, tool wear, job dimension and surface finish in turning AISI-1060 steel’J. Zhejiang Univ., Sci. A711 (2006): 1790–1799
5.
ShajiS.RadhakrishnanV.‘An investigation of surface grinding using graphite as lubricant’Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.426 (2002): 733–740
6.
ShajiS.RadhakrishnanV.‘Investigations on the application of solid lubricants in grinding’Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture 216 B10 (): 1325-1343 DOI: 10.1243/095440502320405421
7.
VenugopalA.RaoP. V.‘Performance improvement of grinding of SiC using graphite as a solid lubricant’Mater. Manuf. Process.192 (2004): 177–186
8.
JianhuaD.TongkunC.XuefengY.JianhuaL.‘Self-lubrication of sintered ceramic tools with CaF2 additions in dry cutting’Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.45 (2005): 1–7
9.
ReddySuresh Kumar N.RaoP. V.‘Experimental investigation to study the effect of solid lubricants on cutting forces and surface quality in end milling’Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.46 (2006): 189–198
10.
SinghD.RaoP. V.‘Performance improvement of hard turning with solid lubricants’Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.32 (2007): 170–177
11.
SundaramR. M.LambertB. K.‘Mathematical models to predict surface finish in fine turning of steel, part 1’Int. J. Prod. Res.195 (1981): 547–556
12.
SundaramR. M.LambertB. K.‘Mathematical models to predict surface finish in fine turning of steel, part 2’Int. J. Prod. Res.195 (1981): 557–564
13.
MittalA.MehtaM.‘Surface finish prediction models for fine turning’Int. J. Prod. Res.2612 (1988): 1861–1876
14.
FangX. D.Safi-JahanshakiH.‘A new algorithm for developing a reference model for predicting surface roughness in finish machining of steels’Int. J. Prod. Res.351 (1997): 179–197
15.
FengX.WangX.‘Development of empirical models for surface roughness prediction in finish turning’Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.20 (2002): 348–356
16.
SureshP. V. S.RaoP. V.DeshmukhS. G.‘A genetic algorithm approach for optimization of surface roughness prediction model’Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.42 (2002): 675–680
17.
OzelT.KarpatY.‘Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks’Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.45 (2005): 467–479
18.
NoordinM. Y.VenkateshV. C.SharifS.EltingS.AbdullahA.‘Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel’J. Mater. Process. Technol.145 (2004): 46–58
19.
SinghD.RaoP. V.‘A surface roughness prediction model for hard turning process’Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.32 (2007): 1115–1124
20.
TrivediK. S.Probability and statistics with reliability, queuing and computer science applications (Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd2001)
