This paper presents the application of a genetic algorithm to state estimation for systems subject to randomly missing input/output data. By modelling the missing data in inputs and outputs with binomial processes, a modified Luenberger observer using the reconstructed data is employed for estimation. The proposed algorithm consists of two procedures: 1) Preprocessing the missing input/output data by reconstruction based on autoregressive (AR) modelling; and 2) implementing the genetic algorithm to perform on-line adaptive state estimation from reconstructed data. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is verified by numerical simulation.
ShiY.FangH.‘Kalman filter-based identification for systems with randomly missing measurements in a network environment.’Int. J. Control83 (3) (2010): 538–551
2.
ShiY.FangH.YanM.‘Kalman filter based adaptive control for networked systems with unknown parameters and randomly missing outputs.’Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control19 (18) (2009): 1976–1992
3.
ShiY.YuB.‘Output feedback stabilization of networked control systems with random delays modeled by Markov chains.’IEEE Trans. Automatic Control54 (7) (2009): 1668–1674
SchenatoL.‘Optimal estimation in networked control systems subject to random delay and packet drop.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control53 (5) (2008): 1311–1317
6.
GaoH.ChenT.‘H∞ estimation for uncertain systems with limited communication capacity.’IEEE Trans. Autom. Control52 (11) (2007): 2070–2084
7.
SavkinA. V.PetersenI. R.‘Robust filtering with missing data and a deterministic description of noise and uncertainty.’Int. J. Syst. Sci.28 (4) (1997): 373–378
8.
MirandaM.TakahashiR.JotaF.‘Hierarchical approach for H∞ robust control design: S/ks mixed sensitivity with genetic algorithm.’IET Control Theory Appl.1 (1) (2007): 18–24
9.
ChenC.-C.WongC.-C.‘Self-generating rule-mapping fuzzy controller design using a genetic algorithm.’IEE Proc., Part D: Control Theory Appl.149 (2) (2002): 143–148
10.
ZuoW.‘Multivariable adaptive control for a space station using genetic algorithms.’IEE Proc., Part D: Control Theory Appl.142 (2) (1995): 81–87
PorterL. M. L.PassinoK.‘Genetic adaptive observers.’ In Proceedings of theAmerican control conference, Seattle, Washington, June 1995, pp. 1847–1851.
13.
LjungL.System identification: theory for the user, second edition, 1999 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey).
14.
BhansaliR. J.‘Linear prediction by autoregressive model fitting in the time domain.’Ann. Stat.6 (1) (1978): 224–231
15.
DingF.ChenT.‘Combined parameter and output estimation of dual-rate systems using an auxiliary model.’Automatica40 (10) (2004): 1739–1748
16.
LiuY.XieL.DingF.‘An auxiliary model recursive least squares algorithm and its convergence for non-uniformly sampled multirate systems.’Proc. IMechE, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering223 (I4) (2009): 445-454 DOI: 10.1243/09596518JSCE686
17.
CooperJ.HindeC.‘Improving genetic algorithms’ efficiency using intelligent fitness functions.’ In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference onDevelopments in applied artificial intelligence, Loughborough, UK, June, 2003, pp. 636–643.
18.
SastryK.GoldbergD. E.‘Genetic algorithms, efficiency enhancement, and deciding well with differing fitness bias values.’ In Proceedings of the Conference onGenetic and evolutionary computation, New York, July, 2002, pp. 536–543.
