To speed up gradient estimation in a slope-seeking controller two different modifications are proposed in this study. In a first approach, the gradient estimation is based on a locally identified black-box model. A further improvement is obtained by applying an extended Kalman filter to estimate the local gradient of an input—output map. Moreover, a simple method is outlined to adapt the search radius in the classical extremum- and slope-seeking approach to reduce the perturbations near the optimal state. To show the versatility of the slope-seeking controller for flow control applications two different wind tunnel experiments are considered, namely with a two-dimensional bluff body and a generic three-dimensional car model (Ahmed body).
BearmanP. W.Investigation of the flow behind a two-dimensional model with a blunt trailing edge and fitted with splitter plates. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1965, 21, 241–255.
2.
TannerM.A method of reducing the base drag of wings with blunt trailing edges. Aeronaut. Q., 1972, 23, 15–23.
3.
TombazisN.BearmanP. W.A study of three-dimensional aspects of vortex shedding from a bluff body with a mild geometric disturbance. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 330, 85–112.
4.
ParkH.LeeD.JeonW.-P.HahnS.KimJ.KimJ.ChoiJ.ChoiH.Drag reduction in flow over a two-dimensional bluff body with a blunt trailing edge using a new passive device. J. Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 563, 389–414.
5.
Gad-el-HakM.PollardA.BonnetJ.-P.Flow control — fundamentals and practices, 1998 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg).
6.
GreenblattD.WygnanskiI. J.The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Prog. Aerospace Sci., 2000, 36, 487–545.
7.
ChoiH.MoinP.KimJ.Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1994, 262, 75–110.
8.
BewleyT. R.LiuS.Optimal and robust control and estimation of linear paths to transition. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 365, 305–349.
9.
CollerB. D.NoackB. R.NarayananS.BanaszukA.KhibnikA. I.Reduced-basis model of active separation control in a planar diffusor flow. AIAA paper 2000–2562, 2000.
10.
WeeD.ParkS.Miake-LyeR.AnnaswamyA. M.GhoniemA. F.Reduced order modeling of reacting shear layers. AIAA paper 2002–0478, 2002.
11.
GerhardJ.PastoorM.KingR.NoackB. R.DillmannA.MorzynskiM.TadmorG.Model-based control of vortex shedding using low-dimensional Galerkin models. AIAA paper 2003–4262, 2003.
12.
PastoorM.KingR.NoackB. R.DillmannA.TadmorG.Model-based coherent-stucture control of turbulent shear flows using low-dimensional vortex models. AIAA paper 2003–4261, 2003.
13.
RowleyC. W.WilliamsD. R.Control of forced and self-sustained oscillations in the flow past a cavity. AIAA paper 2003–0008, 2003.
14.
SiegelS.CohenK.McLaughlinT.Experimental variable gain feedback control of a cylinder wake. AIAA paper 2004–2611, 2004.
15.
AllanB. G.JuangJ.-N.RaneyD. L.SeifertA.PackL. G.BrownD. E.Closed-loop separation control using oscillatory flow excitation. ICASE report 2000–32, 2000.
16.
KingR.BeckerR.GarwonM.HenningL.Robust and adaptive closed-loop control of separated shear flows. AIAA paper 2004–2519, 2004.
17.
BeckerR.KingR.Comparison of a robust and a flatness based control for a separated shear flow. In 16th International Federation of Automatic Control World Congress (IFAC 2005), Prague, Czech Republic, July 2005.
18.
HenningL.KingR.Robust multivariable closed-loop control of a turbulent backward-facing step flow. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J. of Aircraft, 2007, 40(1), 201–208.
19.
GarwonM.KingR.A multivariable adaptive control strategy to regulate the separated flow behind a backward-facing step. In Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, July 2005.
20.
KingR.BeckerR.FeuerbachG.HenningL.PetzR.NitscheW.LemkeO.NeiseW.Adaptive flow control using slope seeking. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Mediterranean Conference on Control automation, Ancona, Italy, 2006.
21.
GarwonM.UrzynicokF.DarmadiL. H.BärwolffG.KingR.Adaptive control of separated flows. In Proceedings of the European Control Conference 2003 (ECC03), Cambridge, 2003.
22.
MoeckJ. P.BothienM. R.PaschereitC. O.GelbertG.KingR.Two-parameter extremum seeking for control of thermoacoustic instabilities and characterization of linear growth. AIAA paper 2007–1416, 2007.
23.
KrsticM.WangH.-H.Stability of extremum seeking feedback for general nonlinear dynamic systems. Automatica, 2000, 36, 595–601.
KimJ.HahnS.KimJ.LeeD.ChoiJ.JeonW.-P.ChoiH.Active control of turbulent flow over a model vehicle for drag reduction. J. Turbulence, 2004, 5 (019).
26.
BearmanP. W.The effect of base bleed on the flow behind a two-dimensional model with a blunt trailing edge. Aeronaut. Q., 1967, 18, 207–224.
27.
GroscheF. R.MeierG. E. A.Research at the DLR Göttingen on bluff body aerodynamics. J. of Wind Engng and Ind. Applic., 2001, 89, 1201–1218.
28.
KingR.SeiboldS.LehmannO.NoackB. R.MorzynskiM.TadmorG.Nonlinear flow control based on a low dimensional model of fluid flow. In MeurerT. et al., editor, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences (Eds Meurer et al.), vol. 322, 2005, pp. 369–386 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg).
29.
BeaudoinJ. F.CadotO.AiderJ.-L.WesfreidJ.-E.Drag reduction of a bluff body using adaptive control methods. Physics of Fluids, 2006, 18(085107), 1–10.
30.
HenningL.KingR.Drag reduction by closed-loop control of a separated flow over a bluff body with a blunt trailing edge. In 44th Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Conference on Decision and control and European Control Conference (ECC) 2005, December 2005.
31.
BrunnA.NitscheW.Active control of turbulent separated flows by means of large scale vortex excitation. In Engineering turbulence modelling and experiments (Eds RodiWMulasM), 2005 no. 6, pp. 555–564 (Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford).
32.
BrunnA.WassenE.SperberD.NitscheW.ThieleF.Active drag control for a generic car model. In Active flow control (Ed KingR), vol. 95 of Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multi-disciplinary design (NNFM), 2007, pp. 247–259 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg).
33.
SchulzJ.GarwonM.SatriadarmaB.KingR.MoserM.NeiseW.Adaptive and robust control for the reduction of tonal noise components of axial turbomachinery with flow control. In Proceedings of DAGA 2004, Strasbourg, France, 2004.
34.
HenningL.PastoorM.KingR.NoackB. R.TadmorG.Feedback control applied to bluff body wake. In Active flow control (Ed KingR), vol. 95 of Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design (NNFM), 2007, pp. 369–391 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg).
SoederstroemT.StoicaP.System identification, 1989 (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
37.
LjungL.System identification — theory for the user, 1999 (Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
38.
GelbA.Applied optimal estimation, 1986 (The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
39.
HuerreP.MonkewitzP. A.Local and global instabilities in spatially developing flows. Annual Rev. Fluid Mechanics, 1990, 22, 473–537.
40.
MerckerE.Eine Blockierungskorrektur für aerodynamische Messungen in offenen und geschlossenen Unterschallwindkanälen, PhD thesis, Technische Universität Berlin, 1980.
41.
AhmedS. R.RammR.FaltinG.Some salient features of the time-averaged ground vehicle wake. SAE paper 840300, 1984.
42.
LienhartH.StootsC.BeckerS.Flow and turbulence structures in the wake of a simplied car model (Ahmed model). In Notes on numerical fluid mechanics, 2002, no. 77, pp. 323–330 (Vieweg, Braunschweig).
