Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Optimization is one of the most interesting and essential subjects in the design of energy systems. In the present work, a new iterative approach for the optimization of complex thermal power plants based on the exergoeconomic analysis and the structural optimization method is proposed. Exergoeconomic analysis is used to determine the sum of the investment and exergy destruction cost flowrates for each component. A numerical sensitivity analysis is performed in order to determine the importance of each decision variable, and by using the structural optimization method, the total cost flowrate is minimized. The advantages of this new iterative methodology are: (a) it can be applied to the large real complex thermal systems, (b) the procedure of optimization is performed without user interface, and (c) since a numerical sensitivity analysis is used, convergency is improved. A simple regenerative Brayton cycle was used as an example to demonstrate how this proposed methodology minimizes the system's total cost flowrate. For comparison of results, a real coding evolutionary algorithm was developed in MATLAB and the optimum solution was obtained.

Keywords

optimization exergoeconomic analysis structural method

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Vieira

L. S.

Donatelli

J. L.

Cruz

M. E.

, ‘Integration of an iterative methodology for exergoeconomic improvement of thermal systems with a process simulator’ Energy Convers. Manage. 45 (2004): 2495–2523.

Bejan

Tsatsaronis

Moran

, Thermal and design optimization (New York: John Wiley 1996).

Tsatsaronis

Moran

, ‘Exergy-aided cost minimization’ Energy Convers. Manage. 38 N15–17 (1997): 1535–1542.

Kotas

T. J.

, The exergy method of thermal plant analysis (Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company 1995).

Valero

Lozano

M. A.

Serra

Tsatsaronis

Pisa

Frangopoulos

C. A.

Von Spakovsky

M. R.

, ‘CGAM problem: Definition and conventional solution’ Energy 19 N3 (1994): 279–286.

Tsatsaronis

Pisa

, ‘Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy systems: Application to the CGAM problem’ Energy 19 N3 (1994): 287–321.

Frangopoulos

C. A.

, ‘Application of thermoeconomic optimization methods to the CGAM problem’ Energy 19 N3 (1994): 323–342.

Von Spakovsky

M. R.

, ‘Application of engineering functional analysis and optimization of the CGAM problem’ Energy 19 N3 (1994): 343–364.

Valero

Serra

Lozano

M. A.

Torres

, ‘Application of the exergetic cost theory to the CGAM problem’ Energy 19 N3 (1994): 365–381.

10.

Erlach

Serra

Valero

, ‘Structural theory as standard for thermoeconomics’ Energy Convers. Manage. 40 (1999): 1627–1649.

11.

Hua

Chen

Q. L.

Wang

, ‘A new exergoeconomic approach for analysis and optimization of energy systems’ Energy 22 N11 (1997): 1071–1078.

12.

El-Sayed

Y. M.

, ‘A second-law-based optimization: Part 1—methodology’ ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 118 (1996): 693–697.

13.

Benelmir

Feidt

, ‘A comparative synthesis of exergo-economic optimization: The IEEB method’ In Proceedings of the ASME Advanced Energy Systems Division, 1996, AES-vol. 36, pp. 445–455 (ASME, NewYork).

14.

Vieira

L. S.

Donatelli

J. L.

Cruz

M. E.

, ‘Exergoeconomic improvement: An alternative to conventional mathematical optimization of complex thermal systems’ In Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress on Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 30 May–3 June 2005.

15.

Vieira

L. S.

Donatelli

J. L.

Cruz

M. E.

, ‘Integration of a mathematical exergoeconomic optimization procedure with a process simulator: Application to the CGAM system’ Engenharia Termica (Therm. Eng.) 4 N2 (2005): 163–172.

16.

Sahoo

P. K.

, ‘Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a cogeneration system using evolutionary programming’ Appl. Therm. Eng. 28 (2008): 1580–1588.

17.

Zhang

Wang

Zheng

Lou

, ‘Exergy cost analysis of a coal fired power plant on structural theory of thermoeconomics’ Energy Convers. Manage. 47 (2006): 817–843.

18.

Lozano

M. A.

Valero

, ‘Theory of the exergetic cost’ Energy Int. J. 18 N9 (1993): 939–960.

19.

Lazzaretto

Tsatsaronis

, ‘On the calculation of efficiencies and costs in thermal systems’ In Proceedings of the ASME Advanced Energy Systems Division—1999, 1999, AES-vol. 39, pp. 421–30 (ASME, NewYork).

20.

Kim

S.-M.

S.-D.

Kwon

Y.-H.

Kwak

H.-Y.

, ‘Exergoeconomic analysis of thermal systems’ Energy 23 N5 (1998): 393–406.

21.

Kwon

Y.-H.

Kwak

H.-Y.

S.-D.

, ‘Exergoeconomic analysis of gas turbine cogeneration systems’ Exergy Int. J. 1 N1 (2001): 31–40.

22.

Frangopoulos

C. A.

, Thermoeconomic functional analysis: A method for optimal design or improvement of complex thermal systems (1983): PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia.

23.

Frangopoulos

C. A.

, ‘Thermoeconomic functional analysis and optimization’ Energy 12 N7 (1987): 563–571.

24.

Von Spakovsky

M. R.

, A practical generalized analysis approach to the optimal thermoeconomic design and improvement of real-world thermal systems (1986): PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia.

25.

Osyczka

, Evolutionary algorithms for single and multicriteria design optimization (New York: Heidelberg 2002).

A new iterative approach to the optimization of thermal energy systems: Application to the regenerative Brayton cycle

Abstract

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References