An unsteady aerodynamic model for horizontal axis wind turbine performance prediction has been extended to consider three-dimensional (3D) rotational effects. The method couples a prescribed wake vortex scheme with a semi-empirical unsteady aerofoil model to provide the unsteady response of the blades due to the cyclic variation of incidence. The wake geometry of the turbine and the basic aerodynamic parameters required by the unsteady aerofoil model are calculated from the prescribed wake model using two-dimensional aerofoil data. The 3D rotational effects are then taken into account by a series of corrections to the unsteady aerofoil model. Application of these corrections has yielded substantial improvements in the prediction of aerodynamic force and moment coefficients on inboard blade sections. This is illustrated by a series of comparisons with field data. In general, the method is shown to give accurate predictions over a range of operating conditions and inflow angles.
HansenA. C.ButterfieldC. P.Aerodynamics of horizontal-axis wind turbines. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mechanics, 1993, 25, 115–149.
2.
RobinsonM. C.GalbraithR. A. McD.ShipleyD. E.MillerM. S.Unsteady aerodynamics of wind turbines. In 33rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 1995.
3.
ShipleyD. E.MillerM. S.RobinsonM. C.Dynamic stall occurrence on a horizontal axis wind turbine blade. In SED, Vol. 16, Wind Energy, 1995 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
4.
WangT.CotonF. N.GalbraithR. A. McD.An examination of two tower-shadow modelling strategies for downwind wind turbines. In 36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 1998, paper AIAA-98-0022.
5.
SnelH.SchepersJ. G.van BusselG. J. W.VermeerL. J.Investigation and modelling of dynamic inflow effects. In Proceedings of European Community Wind Energy Conference, Travemunde, Germany, 1993.
6.
ButterfieldC. P.MusialW. P.ScottG. N.SimmsD. A.NREL Combined Experiment Final Report-Phase II. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Report NREL-TP-442-4807, August 1992.
7.
BanksW.GaddG.Delayed effect of rotation on laminar separation. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1963, 1(4).
8.
RonstenG.Static pressure measurements on a rotating and a non-rotating 2.375 m wind turbine blade-comparison with 2D calculations. J. Wind Energy Ind. Aerodynamics, 1992, 39, 105–118.
9.
TanglerJ. L.SeligM. S.An evaluation of an empirical model for stall delay due to rotation for HAWTS. In Windpower 1997, Austin, Texas, 15-18 June 1997.
10.
SnelH.HouwinkR.BosschersJ.PiersW. J.van BusselG. J. W.BruiningA.Sectional prediction of 3-D effects for stalled flow on rotating blades and comparison with measurements. In Proceedings of European Community Wind Energy Conference, Travemunde, Germany, March 1993.
11.
DuZ.SeligM. S.A 3-D stall-delay model for horizontal axis wind turbine performance prediction. In 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 12-15 January 1998, ASME Wind Energy Symposium technical paper AIAA-98-0021.
12.
CotonF. N.WangT.The prediction of horizontal axis wind turbine performance in yawed flow using an unsteady prescribed wake model. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A, Journal of Power and Energy, 1999, 213(A1), 33–43.
13.
LeishmanJ. G.BeddoesT. S.A semi-empirical model for dynamic stall. J. Am. Helicopter Soc., 1989, 34(3), 3–17.
14.
LeishmanJ. G.A semi-empirical model for dynamic stall. UM-AERO-87-24, University of Maryland, July 1987.
15.
LeishmanJ. G.Practical modeling of unsteady airfoil behaviour in nominally attached two-dimensional compressible flow. UM-AERO-87-6, University of Maryland, July 1987.
16.
MadsenH. A.ChristensenH. F.On the relative importance of rotational, unsteady and three-dimensional effects on the HAWT rotor aerodynamics. Wind Engng, 1990, 14(6), 405–415.
17.
BarnsleyM. J.WellicomeJ. F.Wind tunnel investigation of stall aerodynamics for a 1.0 m horizontal axis rotor. J. Wind Energy Ind. Aerodynamics, 1992, 39, 11–21.
18.
McCroskeyW. J.YaggyP. F.Laminar boundary layers on helicopter rotors in forward flight. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1968, 6(10), 1919–1926.
19.
PierceK.HansenA. C.Prediction of wind turbine rotor loads using the Beddoes-Leishman model for dynamic stall. J. Sol. Energy Engng, 1995, 117(3), 200–204.
20.
SchepersJ. G.BrandA. J.BruiningA.GrahamJ. M. R.HandM. M.InfieldD. G.MadsenH. A.PaynterR. J. H.SimmsD. A.Final Report of IEA, Annex XIV: field rotor aerodynamics. ECN-C-97-027, June 1997.
21.
RonstenG.DahlbergJ.-Å.JiangG.HeD.An experimental investigation of the performance and wind tunnel wall interference for a wind turbine operating in yaw. FFA TN 1994-13, The Aeronautical Research Institute of Sweden (FFA), August 1994.
22.
NivenA. J.GalbraithR. A. McD.Preliminary comparisons between a semi-empirical dynamic stall model and unsteady aerodynamic data obtained from low Mach number wind-tunnel test. Report GU-AERO-9013, Glasgow University, July 1990.
23.
NivenA. J.GalbraithR. A. McD.Modelling dynamic stall vortex inception at low Mach numbers. Aeronaut. J., 1997, 101(1002), 67–76.
24.
NivenA. J.GalbraithR. A. McD.HerringD. G. F.Analysis of reattachment during ramp-down tests. Vertica, 1989, 13, 187.
25.
LakshminarayanaB.GovindanT. R.Analysis of turbulent boundary layer on cascade and rotor blades of turbomachinery. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1981, 19(10), 1333–1341.
