Compared to onshore wind turbines, aerodynamics-induced dynamic characteristics of a floating wind turbine are more complicated due to its coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic behaviours. The study investigates these aerodynamics-induced dynamic characteristics using an OC4 semi-submersible floating wind turbine. In this research, a high-fidelity wind field and a 1/50th scale model were tested. The dynamic characteristics induced by the aerodynamic effects were investigated in detail via the experimental results, including aerodynamic damping effects, gyroscopic effects, dynamic responses of the Rotor-Nacelle-Assembly and dynamic responses of the mooring system. It is found that aerodynamic damping is active in reducing surge and pitch resonant responses and probably increases with the inflow wind speed and the rotating-blades–induced induction coefficient; the gyroscopic effect intensifies the yaw motion and increases with the rotational speed of a rotor; the significant responses from the Rotor-Nacelle-Assembly may occur when the natural frequencies of the tower are close to aerodynamic periodic frequencies; and the mooring system is more sensitive to wave loads rather than to aerodynamic loads. This study presents the complexity of the dynamic characteristics induced by the aerodynamic effects in a floating wind turbine, and in the design code, using time-domain analysis software, which considers the coupling effects between the wind- and wave-induced loads and responses are suggested.
SethuramanL. Hydrodynamics and drive-train dynamics of a direct-drive floating wind turbine. PhD Thesis, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, 2014.
2.
MuliawanMJKarimiradMGaoZ. Extreme responses of a combined spar-type floating wind turbine and floating wave energy converter (STC) system with survival modes. Ocean Eng2013; 65: 71–82.
3.
BaeYHKimMH. Rotor-floater-tether coupled dynamics including second-order sum–frequency wave loads for a mono-column-TLP-type FOWT (floating offshore wind turbine). Ocean Eng2013; 61: 109–122.
4.
FarrugiaRSantTMicallefD. A study on the aerodynamics of a floating wind turbine rotor. Renew Energ2016; 86: 770–784.
5.
SebastianTLacknerM. A comparison of first-order aerodynamic analysis methods for floating wind turbines. In: Proceedings of the 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, FL, 4–7 January 2010. Reston, VA: AIAA.
6.
SebastianTLacknerM. Offshore floating wind turbines – an aerodynamic perspective. In: Proceedings of the 49th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, FL, 4–7 January 2011, pp.1–27. Reston, VA: AIAA.
7.
KarimiradMMoanT. Effect of aerodynamic and hydrodynamic damping on dynamic response of a spar type floating wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the European wind energy conference and exhibition, Warsaw, 20–23 April 2010.
8.
LarsenTJHansonTD. A method to avoid negative damped low frequent tower vibrations for a floating, pitch controlled wind turbine. J Phys Conf Ser2007; 75: 012073.
9.
MartinHRKimballRWViselliAM. Methodology for wind/wave basin testing of floating offshore wind turbines. J Offshore Mech Arct2014; 136: 020905.
10.
CoullingAJGoupeeAJRobertsonAN. Validation of a FAST semi-submersible floating wind turbine numerical model with DeepCwind test data. J Renew Sustain Energ2013; 5(2): 023116.
11.
KarimiradMMeissonnierQGaoZ. Hydroelastic code-to-code comparison for a tension leg spar-type floating wind turbine. Mar Struct2011; 24: 412–435.
12.
CordleAJonkmanJ. State of the art in floating wind turbine design tools. In The Twenty-first International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Maui, HI, 19–24 June 2011, vol. 8, pp.367–374.
13.
BachynskiEEMoanT. Design considerations for tension leg platform wind turbines. Mar Struct2012; 29: 89–114.
RobertsonAJonkmanJMusialW. Offshore code comparison collaboration, continuation: phase II results of a floating semisubmersible wind system. In: Proceedings of EWEA offshore conference, Frankfurt, 19–21 November 2013, pp.1–15.
16.
SkaareBHansonTDYttervikR. Dynamic response and control of the Hywind demo floating wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the European wind energy conference and exhibition, Brussels, 14–17 March 2011.
17.
AubaultACermelliCLahijanianA. WindFloat contraption: from conception to reproduction. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2012 31st international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering: volume 4 – offshore geotechnics; Ronald W. Yeung honoring symposium on offshore and ship hydrodynamics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1–6 July 2012, pp.847–853. New York: ASME.
ViselliAMGoupeeAJDagherHJ. VolturnUS 1:8: conclusion of 18-months of operation of the first grid-connected floating wind turbine prototype in the Americas. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2015 34th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering, St. John’s, NL, Canada, 31 May–5 June 2015, pp.V009T09A055. New York: ASME.
20.
NielsenFGHansonTDSkaareB. Integrated dynamic analysis of floating offshore wind turbines. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering, Hamburg, 4–9 June 2006, pp.671–679. New York: ASME.
21.
KooBJGoupeeAJKimballRW. Model tests for a floating wind turbine on three different floaters. J Offshore Mech Arct2014; 136: 020907.
22.
DuanFHuZLiuG. Experimental comparisons of dynamic properties of floating wind turbine systems based on two different rotor concepts. Appl Ocean Res2016; 58: 266–280.
23.
DuanFHuZNiedzweckiJM. Model test investigation of a spar floating wind turbine. Mar Struct2016; 49: 76–96.
24.
WanLGaoZMoanT. Experimental and numerical study of hydrodynamic responses of a combined wind and wave energy converter concept in survival modes. Coast Eng2015; 104: 151–169.
25.
LiLHuZWangJ. The development and validation of an aero-hydro simulation code for offshore floating wind turbine. J Ocean Wind Energ2015; 2: 1–11.
26.
RoddierDCermelliCWeinsteinA. WindFloat: a floating foundation for offshore wind turbines – part I: design basis and qualification process. In: Proceedings of the ASME 28th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering (OAME’2009), Honolulu, HI, 31 May–5 June 2009, pp.845–853. New York: ASME.
27.
RoddierDCermelliCAubaultA. WindFloat: a floating foundation for offshore wind turbines. J Renew Sustain Energ2010; 2(3): 033104.
28.
AubaultACermelliCRoddierD. WindFloat: a floating foundation for offshore wind turbines – part III: structural analysis. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering, Honolulu, HI, 31 May–5 June 2009, pp.213–220. New York: ASME.
29.
KvittemMIBachynskiEEMoanT. Effects of hydrodynamic modelling in fully coupled simulations of a semi-submersible wind turbine. Enrgy Proced2012; 24: 351–362.
30.
BachynskiEEEtemaddarMKvittemMI. Dynamic analysis of floating wind turbines during pitch actuator fault, grid loss, and shutdown. Enrgy Proced2013; 35: 210–222.
31.
ZambranoTMacCreadyTKiceniukT. Dynamic modeling of deepwater offshore wind turbine structures in Gulf of Mexico storm conditions. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2006 25th international conference on offshore mechanics and Arctic engineering, Hamburg, 4–9 June 2006, pp.629–634. New York: ASME.
32.
RobertsonAJonkmanJMasciolaM. Definition of the semisubmersible floating system for phase II of OC4. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2014, pp.1–38.
33.
BrommundtMKrauseLMerzK. Mooring system optimization for floating wind turbines using frequency domain analysis. Enrgy Proced2012; 24: 289–296.
34.
ChakrabartiSK. Offshore structure modeling. Adv Ser Ocean Eng1994; 9: 470.
35.
MartinHR. Development of a scale model wind turbine for testing of offshore floating wind turbine systems. Master’s Thesis, The University of Maine, Orono, ME, 2011.
MostafaNMuraiMNishimuraR. Study of motion of spar-type floating wind turbines in waves with effect of gyro moment at inclination. J Nav Architect Mar Eng2012; 9: 67–79.
40.
NematbakhshAOlingerDJTryggvasonG. A nonlinear computational model of floating wind turbines. J Fluid Eng: T ASME2013; 135: 121103-1–121103-13.
41.
ManwellJFMcGowanJGRogersAL. Wind energy explained: theory, design and application. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
42.
BurtonTSharpeDBossanyiE. Wind energy handbook. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
43.
RobertsonAGoupeeAJonkmanJ. Summary of conclusions and recommendations drawn from the DeepCwind scaled floating offshore wind system test campaign. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 32nd international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering, Nantes, 9–14 June 2013, pp.1–13. New York: ASME.
44.
GoupeeAJFowlerMJKimballRW. Additional wind/wave basin testing of the DeepCwind semi-submersible with a performance-matched wind turbine. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering, San Francisco, CA, 8–13 June 2014, pp.V09BT09A026. New York: ASME.
45.
GoupeeAJKooBJKimballRW. Experimental comparison of three floating wind turbine concepts. J Offshore Mech Arct2014; 136: 020906.
