The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) in cancellous bone at the calcaneus for the assessment of osteoporosis was first described within this journal 25 years ago. It was recognized in 2006 by Universities UK as being one of the ‘100 discoveries and developments in UK Universities that have changed the world’ over the past 50 years. In 2008, the UK's Department of Health also recognized BUA assessment of osteoporosis in a publication highlighting 11 projects that have contributed to ‘60 years of NHS research benefiting patients’. The BUA technique has been extensively clinically validated and is utilized worldwide, with at least seven commercial systems currently providing calcaneal BUA measurement. However, there is still no fundamental understanding of the dependence of BUA upon the material and structural properties of cancellous bone. This review aims to provide an ‘engineering in medicine’ perspective and proposes a new paradigm based upon phase cancellation due to variation in propagation transit time across the receive transducer face to explain the non-linear relationship between BUA and bone volume fraction in cancellous bone.
Consensus Development Conference. Prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am. J. Med., 1991, 90, 107–110.
2.
DolanP.TorgersonD.The cost of treating osteoporotic fractures in the United Kingdom female population. Osteoporosis Int., 1998, 8, 611–617.
3.
LeibsonC.L.TostesonA.N.A.GabrielS.E.RansomJ.E.MeltonL.J.III.Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: A population-based study. J. Am. Geriatrics Soc., 2002, 50(10), 1644–1650.
4.
CooperC.CampionG.MeltonL.Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int., 1992, 2, 285–289.
5.
LangtonC.M.PalmerS.B.PorterR.W.The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. Proc. Istn Mech. Engrs, Part H: J. Engng Med., 1984, 13, 89–91.
6.
UK Government60 years of research in the NHS benefiting patients, 2008, available at http://www.nihr.ac.uk.
7.
NjehC.F.BoivinC.M.LangtonC.M.The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: A review. Osteoporosis Int., 1997, 7(1), 7–22.
8.
WasnichR.D.RossP.D.HeilbrunL.K.VogelJ.M.Selection of the optimal skeletal site for fracture risk prediction. J. Clin. Orthop., 1987, 216, 262–269.
9.
BlackD.M.CummingsS.R.GenantH.K.NevittM.C.PalermoL.BrownerW.Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women. J. Bone Miner. Res., 1992, 7, 633–638.
10.
WuK.XueQ.AdlerL.Reflection and transmission of elastic waves from a fluid-saturated porous solid boundary. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1990, 87, 2349–2358.
11.
VerhoefW.A.CloostermansM.J.T.M.ThijssenJ.M.Diffraction and dispersion effects on the estimation of ultrasound attenuation and velocity in biological tissues. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engng, 1985, 32, 521–529.
12.
PetleyG.W.RobinsP.A.AindowJ.D.Broadband ultrasonic attenuation: Are current measurement techniques inherently inaccurate?Br. J. Radiol., 1995, 68, 1212–1214.
13.
LangtonC.M.SubhanM.Computer and experimental simulation of a cortical end-plate phase cancellation artefact in the measurement of BUA at the calcaneus. 2001.
14.
PalmerS.B.LangtonC.M.Narrow band ultrasonic frequency attenuation bone measurement system, 4774 959, US, 1988.
15.
LangtonC.M.Ultrasonic bone analyser, 5452 722, US, 1994.
16.
FalgaroneG.P.R.DucheA.KoltaS.DougadosM.RouxC.Discrimination of osteoporotic patients with quantitative ultrasound using imaging or non-imaging device. Joint Bone Spine, 2004, 71, 419–423.
17.
NjehC.F.HansD.LiJ.FanB.FuerstT.HeY.Q.Tauda-FutamiE.LuY.WuC.Y.GenantH.K.Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: Precision and hip fracture discrimination. Osteoporosis Int., 2000, 11(12), 1051–1062.
18.
LangtonC.M.WhiteheadM.A.LangtonD.K.LangleyG.Development of a cancellous bone structural model by stereolithography for ultrasound characterisation of the calcaneus. Med. Engng Phys., 1997, 19(7), 599–604.
19.
ClarkeA.J.EvansJ.A.TruscottJ.G.MilnerR.SmithM.A.A phantom for quantitative ultrasound of trabecular bone. Phys. Med. Biol., 1994, 39(10), 1677–1687.
20.
LangtonC.M.Simulation of bone in ultrasonic assessment apparatus, 5649 538, US, 1997.
21.
EvansW.D.JonesE.A.OwenG.M.Factors affecting the in-vivo precision of broad-band ultrasonic-attenuation. Phys. Med. Biol., 1995, 40(1), 137–151.
22.
JohansenA.StoneM.D.The effect of ankle oedema on bone ultrasound assessment at the heel. Osteoporosis Int., 1997, 7(1), 44–47.
23.
LangtonC.M.AliA.V.RiggsC.M.EvansG.P.BonfieldW.A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1990, 11, 243–249.
24.
World Health OrganizationAssessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis, World Health Organization technical report series 843. 1994.
25.
LangtonC.M.ZSD: A universal parameter for precision in the ultrasonic assessment of osteoporosis. Physiol. Meas., 1997, 18(1), 67–72.
26.
MoayyeriA.KaptogeS.DalzellN.BinghamS.LubenR.N.WarehamN.J.ReeveJ.KhawK.T.Is QUS or DXA better for predicting the 10-year absolute risk of fracture?J. Bone Miner. Res., 2009, 24(7), 1319–1325.
27.
McCloskeyE.V.MurrayS.A.CharlesworthD.MillerC.FordhamJ.CliffordK.AtkinsR.KanisJ.A.Assessment of broadband ultrasound attenuation in the oscalcis in-vitro. Clin. Sci., 1990, 78, 221–225.
28.
McKelvieM.L.FordhamJ.CliffordC.PalmerS.B.In-vitro comparison of quantitative computed tomography and broadband ultrasonic attenuation of trabecular bone. Bone, 1989, 10, 101–104.
29.
NicholsonP.H.F.HaddawayM.J.DavieM.W.H.The dependence of ultrasonic properties on orientation in human vertebral bone. Phys. Med. Biol., 1994, 39(6), 1013–1024.
30.
HanS.RhoJ.MedigeJ.ZivI.Ultrasound velocity and broadband attenuation over a wide range of bone mineral density. Osteoporosis Int., 1996, 6(4), 291–296.
31.
EvansJ.A.TavakoliM.B.Ultrasonic attenuation and velocity in bone. Phys. Med. Biol., 1990, 35, 1387–1396.
32.
AlvesJ.M.WeiX.LinD.SiffertR.S.RyabyJ.T.KaufmanJ.J.Ultrasonic assessment of human and bovine trabecular bone: A comparison study. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engng, 1996, 43(3), 249–258.
33.
HodgskinsonR.NjehC.F.WhiteheadM.A.LangtonC.M.Non-linear relationship between BUA and porosity in cancellous bone mimics. Phys. Med. Biol., 1996, 41, 2411–2420.
34.
StrelitzkiR.EvansJ.A.ClarkeA.J.The influence of porosity and pore size on the ultrasonic properties of bone investigated using a phantom material. Osteoporosis Int., 1997, 7(4), 370–375.
35.
NicholsonP.F.NjehC.F.Ultrasonic studies of cancellous bone in-vitro. In Quantitative ultrasound: assessment of osteoporosis and bone status (Eds NjehC. F.Hans FuerstT.GluerC. C.GenantH. K.), 1999, pp. 195–220 (Martin Dunitz, London, UK).
36.
LangtonC.M.NjehC.F.HodgskinsonR.A.G.CurreyJ.D.Prediction of mechanical properties of the human calcaneus by broadband ultrasonic attenuation. Bone, 1996, 18(6), 495–503.
37.
RhoJ.Y.Ultrasonic characterisation in determining elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. Med. Biol. Engng Comput.1998, 36(1), 57–59.
38.
HanS.U.MedigeJ.ZivI.Combined models of ultrasound velocity and attenuation for predicting trabecular bone strength and mineral density. Clin. Biomech., 1996, 11(6) 348–353.
39.
GrimmM.J.WilliamsJ.L.Assessment of bone quantity and ‘quality’ by ultrasound attenuation and velocity in the heel. Clin. Biomech., 1997, 12(5), 281–285.
40.
NicholsonP.H.F.LowetG.ChengX.G.BoonenS.Van Der PerreG.DequekerJ.Assessment of the strength of the proximal femur in vitro: relationship with ultrasonic measurements of the calcaneus. Bone, 1997, 20(3), 219–224.
41.
BouxseinM.L.CourtneyA.C.HayesW.C.Ultrasound and densitometry of the calcaneus correlate with the failure loads of cadaveric femurs. Calcified Tissue Int., 1995, 56(2), 99–103.
42.
ChengX.G.NicholsonP.H.F.BoonenS.LowetG.BrysP.AerssensP.van der PerreG.DequekerJ.Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound. J. Bone Miner. Res., 1997, 12(10), 1721–1728.
43.
LochmüllerE.M.EcksteinF.KaiserD.ZellerJ.B.LandgrafJ.PutzR.SteldingerR.Prediction of vertebral failure loads from spinal and femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and calcaneal ultrasound: An in situ analysis with intact soft tissues. Bone, 1998, 23(5), 417–424.
44.
LochmüllerE.ZellerJ.B.KaiserD.EcksteinF.LandgrafJ.PutzR.SteldingerR.Correlation of femoral and lumbar DXA and calcaneal ultrasound, measured in situ with intact soft tissues, with the in vitro failure loads of the proximal femur. Osteoporosis Int., 1998, 8(6), 591–598.
45.
LangtonC.EvansG.HodgskinsonR.RiggsC.Ultrasonic, elastic and structural properties of cancellous bone. In Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurements, 1990 (British Institute of Radiology, Bath, UK).
46.
GluerC.C.WuC.Y.GenantH.K.Broad-band ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation - an in vitro study. Osteoporosis Int., 1993, 3(4), 185–191.
47.
TavakoliM.EvansJ.The effect of bone structure on ultrasonic attenuation and velocity. Ultrasonics, 1992, 30(6), 389–395.
HansD.ArlotM.E.SchottA.M.RouxJ.P.KotzkiP.O.MeunierP.J.Do ultrasound measurements on the oscalcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass - a 2-dimensional histomorphometric stud y. Bone, 1995, 16(3), 295–300.
50.
LaugierP.DroinP.Laval-JeantetA.M.BergerG.In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. Bone, 1997, 20(2), 157–165.
51.
WearK.A.Frequency dependence of ultrasonic backscatter from human trabecular bone: Theory and experiment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1999, 106(6), 3659–3664.
52.
McKelvieM.L.PalmerS.B.The interaction of ultrasound with cancellous bone. Phys. Med. Biol., 1991, 36, 1331–1340.
53.
BiotM.A.Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid, II. High frequency range. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1956, 28, 179–191.
54.
SchoenbergM.Wave propagation in alternating solid and fluid layers. Wave Motion, 1984, 6, 303–320.
55.
KaufmannJ.J.LuoG.M.SiffertR.S.On the relative contributions of absorption and scattering to ultrasound attenuation in trabecular bone: a simulation study. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics., 2003, pp. 1519–1523 (IEEE Press, Piscataway, New Jersey).
56.
SehgalC.M.Quantitative relationship between tissue composition and scattering of ultrasound. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1993, 94(4), 1944–1952.
57.
ChernovL.A.Wave propagation in a random medium, 1960 (McGraw-Hill, New York, New York).
58.
HughesE.R.LeightonT.G.PetleyG.W.WhiteP.R.Ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone: A new stratified model. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 1999, 25, 811–821.
59.
HughesE.R.LeightonT.G.WhiteP.R.PetleyG.W.Investigation of an anisotropic tortuosity in a Biot model of ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2007, 121, 568–574.
60.
StrelitzkiR.NicholsonP.H.F.PaechV.A model for ultrasonic scattering in cancellous bone based on velocity fluctuations in a binary mixture. Physiol. Meas., 1998, 19, 189–196.
61.
NicholsonP.H.F.StrelitzkiR.ClevelandR.O.BouxseinM.L.Scattering of ultrasound in cancellous bone: Predictions from a theoretical model. J. Biomech., 2000, 33, 503–506.
62.
HaireT.J.LangtonC.M.Biot theory: A review of its application on ultrasound propagation through cancellous bone. Bone, 1999, 24, 291–295.
63.
LeeK.I.RohH.S.YoonS.W.Acoustic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone: Application of the modified Biot-Attenborough model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2003, 114(4), 2284–2293.
64.
FellahZ.E.A.ChapelonJ.Y.BergerS.LauriksW.DepollierC.Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cancellous bone: Application of Biot theor y. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2004, 116, 61–73.
65.
SebaaN.FellahZ.E.A.FellahM.OgamE.WirginA.MitriF.G.DepollierC.LauriksW.Ultrasonic characterization of human cancellous bone using the Biot theory: Inverse problem. J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 2006, 120(4), 1816–1824.
66.
JohnsonD.L.KoplikJ.DashenR.Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity in fluid-saturated porous media. J. Fluid Mech., 1987, 176, 379–402.
67.
AttenboroughK.QinQ.FaganM.J.ShinH.-C.LangtonC.M.Measurements of tortuosity in stereolithographical bone replicas using audio-frequency pulses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2005, 118, 2779–2782.
