Osteoporosis, often termed the ‘silent epidemic’, has been defined as ‘a decrease in bone mass and architectural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to enhanced bone fragility and consequent increase in fracture risk’. In the United Kingdom alone, the annual health costs are in excess of £750 million, with 60 000 patients suffering a hip fracture each year. A quarter of these will die within 12 months of their fracture, half of the remainder will never regain independent living. The established procedure for assessing the risk of osteoporotic fracture is via bone mineral density (BMD) assessment using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, DXA is an expensive technique and is not widely available. Within the past 15 years, ultrasound assessment of bone has rapidly advanced in scientific understanding, technical development and clinical utility. Measurements of cancellous bone (particularly at the calcaneus) are generally performed in preference to those of cortical bone (tibial cortex). There are currently 15 commercial systems available and over 3500 systems are in use world-wide. The low cost and portability offered by ultrasound systems should enable an integrated community-based screening programme to be established in the near future.
Ultrasound measurements of bone are generally obtained using transmission rather than pulse-echo techniques owing to its highly attenuating nature. Ultrasound velocity and attenuation measurements are utilized. For velocity, there are well-defined fundamental relationships describing the dependence upon the elasticity and density of bone.
Consensus Development Conference: Prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am. J. Med., 1991, 90, 107–110.
2.
UK Department of Health Report: Advisory Group on Osteoporosis. Chair Professor D. H. Barlow, 1994.
3.
PainH. J.The physics of vibrations and waves. In The Physics of Vibrations, 1985 (John Wiley, Chichester).
4.
LakesR.YoonH. S.KatzJ. L.Ultrasonic wave propagation and attenuation in wet bone. J. Biomed. Engng, 1986, 8, 143–148.
5.
AshmanR. B.Jae YoungR.Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. J. Biomechanics, 1988, 21, 177–181.
6.
GreenleafJ. F.JohnsonS. A.SamayoaW. F.DuckF. A.Two-dimensional acoustic velocity distributions in tissues using an algebraic reconstruction technique. In Ultrasonics International Conference Proceedings, London, 1975, pp. 190–194 (Guildford IPC).
7.
BowenT.ConnorW. G.NasoniR. L.PiferA. E.SholesR. R.Measurement of the temperature dependence of the velocity of ultrasound in soft tissues. In Ultrasonic Tissue Characterisation II (Ed. LinzerM.), NBS Publication 525, 1979, pp. 57–61 (US Government, Washington, DC).
8.
CadossiR.CaneV.Pathways of transmission of ultrasound energy through the distal metaphysis of the second phalanx of pigs: An in vitro study. Osteoporosis Int., 1996, 6, 196–206.
9.
SachseW.PaoY. H.On the determination of phase and group velocities of dispersive waves in solids. J. Appl. Phys., 1978, 49, 4320–4327.
10.
NicholsonP. H. F.LowetG.LangtonC. M.DequekerJ.Van der PerreG.A comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to ultrasonic velocity measurement in trabecular bone. Phys. Med. Biol., 1996, 41, 2421–2435.
11.
NjehC. F.HodgskinsonR.CurreyJ. D.LangtonC. M.Orthogonal relationships between ultrasonic velocity and material properties of bovine cancellous bone. Med. Eng. Phys., 1996, 18, 373–381.
12.
CarterD. R.HayesW. C.The compressive behaviour of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1977, 59, 954–962.
13.
RiceJ. C.CowinS. C.BowmanJ. A.On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J. Biomechanics, 1988, 21, 155–168.
14.
GibsonL. J.The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J. Biomechanics, 1985, 18, 317–328.
15.
KinslerL. E.FreyA. R.CoppensA. B.SandersJ. V.Fundamentals of acoustics. In Fundamental Acoustics, 1992 (John Wiley, New York).
16.
LangtonC. M.PalmerS. B.PorterR. W.The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. Engng Med., 1984, 13, 89–91.
17.
NjehC. F.The dependence of ultrasound velocity and attenuation on the material properties of cancellous bone. PhD thesis, Sheffield Hallam University, 1995.
18.
TurnerC. H.EichM.Ultrasonic velocity as a predictor of strength in bovine cancellous bone. Calcif. Tissue Int., 1991, 49, 116–119.
19.
LangtonC. M.NjehC. F.HodgskinsonR.CurreyJ. D.Prediction of mechanical properties of the human calcaneus by broadband ultrasonic attenuation. Bone, 1996, 18, 495–503.
20.
NicholsonP. H. F.HaddawayM. J.DavieM. W. J.The dependence of ultrasonic properties on orientation in human vertebral bone. Phys. Med. Biol., 1994, 39, 1013–1024.
21.
BouxseinM. L.RadloffS. E.HayesW. C.Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus reflects trabecular bone strength, modulus and morphology. J. Bone Miner. Res., 1995, 10, S175.
22.
NjehC. F.LangtonC. M.The effect of cortical endplates on ultrasound velocity through the calcaneus: An in vitro study. Br. J. Radiol., 1997, 70, 504–510.
23.
BouxseinM. L.CourtneyA. C.HayesW. C.Ultrasound and densitometry of the calcaneus correlate with the failure loads of cadaveric femurs. Calcif. Tissue Int., 1995, 56, 99–103.
24.
NicholsonP. H. F.LowetG.ChengX. G.BoonenS.Van der PerreG.DequekerJ.Assessment of the strength of the proximal femur in vitro: relationship with ultrasonic measurements of the calcaneus. Bone, 1997, 20, 219–224.
25.
McCloskeyE. V.MurrayS. A.CharlesworthD.MillerC.FordhamJ.CliffordK.AtkinsR.KanisJ. A.Assessment of broadband ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis in-vitro. Clin. Sci., 1990, 78, 221–225.
26.
McKelvieM. L.FordhamJ.CliffordC.PalmerS. B.In vitro comparison of quantitative computed tomography and broadband ultrasonic attenuation of trabecular bone. Bone, 1989, 10, 101–104.
27.
LaugierP.DroinP.Laval-JeantetA. M.BergerG.In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. Bone, 1997, 20, 157–165.
28.
EvansJ. A.TavakoliM. B.Ultrasonic attenuation and velocity in bone. Phys. Med. Biol., 1990, 35, 1387–1396.
29.
HodgskinsonR.NjehC. F.WhiteheadM. A.LangtonC. M.The non-linear relationship between BUA and porosity in cancellous bone. Phys. Med. Biol., 1996, 41, 2411–2420.
30.
HanS.RhoJ.MedigeJ.ZivI.Ultrasound velocity and broadband attenuation over a wide range of bone mineral density. Osteoporosis Int., 1996, 6, 291–296.
31.
SerpeL.RhoJ-Y.The non-linear transition period of broadband ultrasound attenuation as bone density varies. J. Biomechanics, 1996, 29 (7), 963–966.
32.
LangtonC. M.EvansG. P.HodgskinsonR.RiggsC. M.Ultrasonic, elastic and structural properties of cancellous bone. In Current Research in Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Measurements I (Ed. RingE. F. G.), 1990, pp. 10–11 (British Institute of Radiology, London).
33.
GluerC. C.WuC. Y.GenantH. K.Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: An in vitro study. Osteoporosis Int., 1993, 3, 185–191.
34.
HansD.ArlotM. E.SchottA. M.RouxJ. P.KotzkiP. O.MeunierP. J.Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass?: A two-dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone, 1995, 16, 295–300.
TavakoliM. B.EvansJ. A.The effect of bone structure on ultrasonic attenuation and velocity. Ultrasonics, 1992, 30, 389–395.
37.
LangtonC. M.WhiteheadM. A.LangtonD. K.LangleyG.Development of a cancellous bone structural model by stereolithography for ultrasound characterisation of the calcaneus. Medical Engng Phys., 1997, 19 (7), 599–604.
38.
FazzalariN. L.ParkinsonI. H.Fractal dimension and architecture of trabecular bone. J. Pathology, 1996, 178, 100–105.
39.
RhoJ-Y.FlaitzD.SwarnakarV.AcharyaR. S.The characterization of broadband ultrasound attenuation and fractal analysis by biomechanical properties. Bone, 1997, 20 (5), 497–504.
WilliamsJ. L.GrimmM. J.WehrliF. W.FosterK. R.ChungH-W.Prediction of frequency and pore size dependent attenuation of ultrasound in trabecular bone using Biot's theory. In Mechanics of Poroelasticity (Ed. SelvaduraiA. P. S.), 1996, pp. 263–271 (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
42.
BiotM. A.Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid. I. Low frequency range. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1956, 28, 168–178.
43.
BiotM. A.Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid saturated porous solid. II. High frequency range. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1956, 28, 179–191.
44.
GistG. A.Fluid effects on velocity and attenuation in sandstones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1994, 96 (2), 1158–1173.
45.
HansD.SchottA. M.ArlotM. E.SornayE.DelmasP. D.MeunierP. J.Influence of anthropometric parameters on ultrasound measurements of os calcis. Osteoporosis Int., 1995, 5, 371–376.
46.
KotzkiP. O.BuyckD.HansD.ThomasE.BonnelF.FavierF.MeunierP. J.RossiM.Influence of fat on ultrasound measurements of the os calcis. Calcif. Tissue Int., 1994, 54, 91–95.
47.
MillerC. G.HerdR. J.RamalingamT.FogelmanI.BlakeG. M.Ultrasonic velocity measurements through the calcaneus: Which velocity should be measured?Osteoporosis Int., 1993, 3, 31–35.
48.
LangtonC. M.AliA. V.RiggsC. M.EvansG. P.BonfieldW.A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1990, 11 (3), 243–249.
49.
StrelitzkiR.ClarkeA. J.EvansJ. A.The measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in fixed trabecular bone using broadband pulses and single-frequency tone bursts. Phys. Med. Biol., 1996, 41, 743–753.
50.
RagozzinoM.Analysis of the error in measurement of ultrasound speed in tissue due to waveform deformation by frequency-dependent attenuation. Ultrasonics, 1981, 19, 135–138.
51.
WuC. Y.GluerC. C.JergasM.BendavidE.GenantH. K.The impact of bone size on broadband ultrasound attenuation. Bone, 1995, 16, 137–141.
52.
SerpeL. J.RhoJ. Y.Broadband ultrasound attenuation value dependence on bone width in-vitro. Phys. Med. Biol., 1996, 41, 197–202.
53.
BlakeG. M.HerdR. J.MillerC. G.FogelmanI.Should broadband ultrasonic attenuation be normalized for the width of the calcaneus?Br. J. Radiol., 1994, 67, 1206–1209.
54.
LangtonC. M.BattistaS.BergerG.EvansJ. A.GluerC. C.HansD.KushkuleyL.LaugierP.NicholsonP.Definition consensus workshop for the ultrasonic assessment of bone. Clin. Rheumatol., 1997, 16 (1), 115–116.
