The purpose of this study was to develop a method for simultaneous measurement of the mechanical properties of articular cartilage and underlying trabecular bone. Cylindrical bone-cartilage specimens from human cadaver knees were tested under non-destructive axial compression. The specimens were mounted in a cage by three screws fixed to the subchondral bone plate to create a reference plane between the cartilage and the bone. Each test was carried out as a single test cycle between a 0.12 MPa (4N) pre-stress and 0.5 per cent bone strain. Twenty conditioning cycles were performed prior to each test cycle. In order to determine the reproducibility of the test method, the test procedure was repeated after turning the cage through 90°. The specimens were then kept at + 5°C for 24 hours, and the procedure was repeated.
The normalized stiffness and energy absorptive properties were calculated from each test cycle. No significant difference was found between the results obtained on the first and on the second day. Both days the stiffness of cartilage was significantly larger during the second test, indicating that 20 conditioning cycles may not provide a viscoelastic steady state.
RadinE. L.PaulI. L.TolkoffM. J.Subchondral bone changes in patients with early degenerative joint disease. Arthr. Rheum., 1970, 13, 400–405.
2.
MowV. C.KueiS. C.LaiW. M.ArmstrongC. G.Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: Theory and experiments. J. Biomech. Engng, 1980, 102, 73–84.
3.
ArmstrongC. G.MowV. C.Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration and water content. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1982, 64-A (1), 88–94.
4.
KwanM. K.WayneJ. S.WooS. L.-YFieldF. P.HooverJ.MeyersM.Histological and biomechanical assessment of articular cartilage from stored osteochondral shell allografts. J. Orthop. Res., 1989, 7, 637–644.
5.
AkizukiS.MowV. C.MullerF.PitaJ. C.HowellD. S.ManicourtD. H.Tensile properties of human knee joint cartilage I: Influence of ionic conditions, weight bearing and fibrillation on the tensile modulus. J. Orthop. Res., 1986, 4, 379–392.
6.
SchmidtM. B.SchoonbeckJ. M.MowV. C.EyreD. R.ChunL. E.The relationship between collagen crosslinking and tensile properties of articular cartilage. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 1987, pp. 134.
7.
SchmidtM. B.MowV. C.ChunL. E.EyreD. R.Effects of proteoglycan extraction on the tensile behavior of articular cartilage. J. Orthop. Res., 1990, 8, 353–363.
8.
ArmstrongC. G.LaiW. M.MowV. C.Unconfined compression of articular cartilage. In Biomechanics Symposium (Eds Van BuskirkW. C.WooS. L.-Y.) New York, 1981, pp. 133–136 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers).
9.
MephersonR.McAllisterD.ShriveN.SchacharN.A comparison of confined and unconfined biomechanical testing of articular cartilage: Sensitivity and variability. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 1990, pp. 154.
AspdenR. M.LarssonT.SvenssonR.HeinegårdD.Computer-controlled mechanical testing machine for small samples of biological viscoelastic materials. J. Biomed. Engng, 1991, 13, 521–525.
12.
HayesW. C.MockrosL. F.Viscoelastic properties of human articular cartilage. J. Appl. Physics, 1971, 31 (4), 562–567.
13.
LindeF.GøthgenC. B.HvidI.PongsoipetchB.BentzenS. M.Mechanical properties of trabecular bone by a non-destructive compression testing approach. Engng in Medicine, 1988, 17, 23–30.
14.
LindeF.HvidI.PongsoipetchB.Energy absorptive properties of human trabecular bone specimens during axial compression. J. Orthop. Res., 1989, 7, 432–439.
15.
SharpD. J.TannerK. E.BonfieldW.Measurement of the density of trabecular bone. J. Biomechanics, 1990, 23, 853–857.
LindeF.HvidI.JensenN. C.Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in repetitive axial loading. Engng in Medicine, 1985, 14, 173–177.
18.
LindeF.PongsoipetchB.FrichL.HvidI.Three-axial strain controlled testing applied to bone specimens from the proximal tibial epiphysis. J. Biomechanics, 1990, 23, 1167–1172.
19.
LindeF.HvidI.MadsenF.The effect of specimen size and geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone. J. Biomechanics, 1992, 25, 359–368.
20.
LindeF.HvidI.Stiffness behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J. Biomechanics, 1987, 20, 83–89.
21.
LindeF.HvidI.The effect of constraint on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J. Biomechanics, 1989, 22, 485–490.
22.
CookM.LarkeE. C.Resistance of copper and copper alloys to homogeneous deformation in compression. J. Inst. Metals, 1945, 71, 371–390.
23.
DieterG. E.Mechanical Metallurgy, 1961, pp. 479–480 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
24.
BrownT. D.FergusonA. B.Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur. Acta Orthop. Scand., 1980, 51, 429–437.
25.
OdgaardA.LindeF.The underestimation of Young's modulus in compression testing of cancellous bone specimens. J. Biomechanics, 1991, 24, 691–698.
26.
KeavenyT. M.RobertsE. B.GibsonL. J.HayesW. C.Theoretical analysis of the experimental artifact in trabecular bone compressive modulus. J. Biomechanics, 1993, 26, 599–607.
27.
LindeF.Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach. Danish Med. Bull., 1994, 4 (2), 119–138.
28.
BrownT. D.VrahasM. K.The apparent elastic modulus of the juxtarticular subchondral bone of the femoral head. J. Orthop. Res., 1984, 2, 32–38.
29.
CarterD. R.HayesW. C.The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1977, 59-A (7), 954–962.
30.
LindeF.NøgaardP.HvidI.OdgaardA.SøballeK.Mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Dependency on strain rate. J. Biomechanics, 1991, 24, 803–809.
31.
RadinE. L.PaulI. L.Importance of bone in sparing articular cartilage from impact. Clin. Orthop., 1971, 78, 342–344.
