Simplified motion and loading compared to physiological motion and loading in a hip joint simulator

Abstract

Abstract

Two wear tests were conducted using the Durham Hip Joint Wear Simulator to investigate the effects of simplified motion and loading on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) acetabular cup wear rates. Bovine serum was used as a lubricant and a gravimetric technique was used to measure wear.

The first wear test duration was 7.1 × 10⁶ cycles and investigated the effect of simplified loading. This was achieved by using full physiological motion and loading for the first 5 × 10⁶ cycles of the test, then physiological motion with simplified loading for the final 2.1 × 10⁶ cycles of the wear test. The UHMWPE acetabular cup wear rates using full physiological motion and loading were 32.2 and 51.7 mm³/10⁶ cycles against zirconia and CoCrMo femoral heads respectively. Using simplified loading the cup wear rates were 30.1 and 49.2 mm³/10⁶ cycles against zirconia and CoCrMo respectively which was not significantly different from wear rates with physiological loading.

The effect of simplified motion was investigated in a second wear test of 5.0 × 10⁶ cycles duration. Physiological loading was applied across the prosthesis with physiological motion in the flexion/extension plane only. Mean wear of the acetabular component dropped to 0.197 mm³/10⁶ cycles.

The surfaces of all the actabular cups were subject to gross examination, optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. No notable difference was observed between the cups subjected to physiological motion and loading and those subjected to simplified loading. The cups worn with a single plane of motion had a much smaller worn area and a notable difference in surface features to the other cups. Simplifed loading is therefore an acceptable simplification in simulator testing but simplifying motion to the flexion/extension plane axis only is unacceptable.