External fixation is widely used in the fixation of fractures and limb deformities. The mechanical characteristics of a specific external fixator are major factors in determining the biomechanical environment at a fracture/osteotomy site and, hence, affect the healing process. Although the optimal biomechanical environment for healing of a fracture or an osteotomy is unknown, a specific range of interfragmentary motion exists which promotes healing. It is therefore desirable that the mechanics of an external fixator can be manipulated to enable the surgeon to control the range of interfragmentary motion. The characteristics of an external fixator are defined by a large number of variables. Therefore, to gain control over the degree of interfragmentary motion, an understanding of the effect of each variable and how it interacts with the others to determine the overall characteristics of the device is required. For the past two decades, individual components and whole-frame configurations have been studied in depth. This article provides a summary of previous work concerning the mechanics of external ring fixators and how they affect the biomechanical environment at the fracture/osteotomy site.
BehrensF.A primer of fixator devices and configurations. Clin. Orthop., 1989, 241, 5–14.
2.
BehrensF.General theory and principles of external fixation. Clin. Orthop., 1989, 241, 15–23.
3.
BronsonD. G.SamchukovM. L.BirchJ. G.BrowneR. H.AshmanR. B.Stability of external circular fixation: A multi-variable biomechanical analysis. Clin. Biomechanics, 1998, 13, 441–448.
4.
PaleyD.Biomechanics of the Ilizarov external fixator. In Operative Principles of Ilizarov (Eds MaiocchiA. B.AronsonJ.), 1991, pp. 33–41 (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore).
5.
TetsworthK. D.PaleyD.Accuracy of correction of complex lower-extremity deformities by the Ilizarov method. Clin. Orthop., 1994, 301, 102–110.
6.
ChaoE. Y. S.AroH. T.LewallenD. G.KellyP. J.The effect of rigidity on fracture healing in external fixation. Clin. Orthop., 1989, 241, 24–35.
7.
GoodshipA. E.KenwrightJ.The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1985, 67-B, 650–655.
8.
IlizarovG. A.The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part 1: The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin. Orthop., 1989, 238, 249–281.
9.
IlizarovG. A.Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. Clin. Orthop., 1990, 250, 8–26.
10.
RichardsM.GouletJ. A.WeissJ. A.WaandersN. A.SchafflerM. B.GoldsteinS. A.Bone regeneration and fracture healing: Experience with distraction osteogenesis model. Clin. Orthop., 1998, 355S, S191–204.
11.
WaandersN. A.RichardsM.SteenH.KuhnJ. L.GoldsteinS. A.GouletJ. A.Evaluation of the mechanical environment during distraction osteogenesis. Clin. Orthop., 1998, 349, 225–234.
12.
WolfS.JanousekA.PfeilJ.VeithW.HaasF.DudaG.ClaesL.The effects of external mechanical stimulation on the healing of diaphyseal osteotomies fixed by external fixation. Clin. Biomechanics, 1998, 13, 359–364.
13.
WolfJ. R.WhiteA. A.PanjabiM. M.SouthwickW. O.Comparison of cyclic loading versus constant compression in the treatment of long-bone fractures in rabbits. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1981, 60-A, 805–810.
14.
WuJ.ShyrH. S.ChaoE. Y.S.KellyP. J.Comparison of osteotomy healing under external fixation devices with different stiffness characteristics. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1984, 66-A, 1258–1264.
ClaesL. E.HeigeleC. A.Neidlinger-WilkeC.KasparM. S.SeidlW.MargeviciusK. J.AugatP.Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clin. Orthop., 1998, 355S, SI32–147.
20.
GardnerT. N.EvansM.SimpsonH.Temporal variation of applied interfragmentary displacement at a bone fracture in harmony with maturation of the fracture callus. Med. Engng Physics, 1998, 20, 480–484.
21.
KenwrightJ.GoodshipA. E.Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures. Clin. Orthop., 1989, 241, 36–47.
22.
LanyonL. E.RubinC. T.Static vs. dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J. Biomechanics, 1984, 17, 897–905.
23.
O'DohertyD. M.ButlerS. P.GoodshipA. E.Stress protection due to external fixation. J. Biomechanics, 1995, 28, 575–586.
24.
SarmientoA.SchaefferJ. F.BeckermanL.LattaL. L.EnisJ. E.Fracture healing in rat femora as affected by functional weight bearing. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1977, 59-A, 369–375.
25.
YamagishiM.YoshimuraY.The biomechanics of fracture healing. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1955, 37-A, 1035–1068.
26.
GardnerT. N.KenwrightJ.The influence of external fixators on fracture motion during simulated walking. Med. Engng Physics, 1996, 18 (4), 305–313.
27.
LindholmR. V.LindholmT. S.TiokkanenS.LeinoR.Effect of forced interfragmental movements on the healing of tibial fractures in rats. Acta Orthop. Scand., 1970, 40, 721–728.
28.
GardnerT. N.EvansM.HardyJ.KenwrightJ.Dynamic interfragmentary motion in fractures during routine patient activity. Clin. Orthop., 1997, 336, 216–225.
29.
DelpreteC.GolaM. M.Mechanical performance of external fixators with wires for the treatment of bone fractures. Part II: Wire tension and slippage. J. Biomech. Engng, 1993, 115, 37–42.
PaleyD.FlemingB.CatagniM.KristiansenT.PopeM.Mechanical evaluation of external fixators used in limb lengthening. Clin. Orthop., 1990, 250, 50–57.
32.
AaronA. D.EilertR. E.Results of the Wagner and Ilizarov methods of limb-lengthening. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1996, 78-A, 20–29.
33.
MccoyM. T.ChaoE. Y.S.KasmanR. A.Comparison of mechanical performance in four types of external fixators. Clin. Orthop., 1983, 180, 23–33.
34.
PodolskyA.ChaoE. Y. S.Mechanical performance of Ilizarov circular external fixators in comparison with other external fixators. Clin. Orthop., 1993, 293, 61–70.
35.
KummerF. J.Biomechanics of the Ilizarov external fixator. Clin. Orthop., 1992, 280, 11–14.
36.
AronsonJ.HarpJ. H.Mechanical considerations in using tensioned wires in a transosseous external fixation system. Clin. Orthop., 1992, 280, 23–29.
37.
HillardP. J.HarrisonA. J.AtkinsR. M.The yielding of fine tensioned wires in the Ilizarov frame. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1998, 212 (H1), 37–47.
OrbayG. L.FrankelV. H.KummerF. J.The effect of wire configuration on the stability of the Ilizarov external fixator. Clin. Orthop., 1992, 279, 299–302.
40.
SteinH.MosheiffR.BaumgartF.FriggR.PerrenS. M.CordeyJ.The hybrid ring tubular external fixator: A biomechanical study. Clin. Biomechanics, 1997, 12, 259–266.
41.
PughK. J.WolinskyP. R.DawsonJ. M.StahlmanG. C.The biomechanics of hybrid external fixation. J. Orthop. Trauma, 1999, 13 (1), 20–26.
42.
GasserB.BomanB.WyderD.SchneiderE.Stiffness characteristics of the Ilizarov device as opposed to conventional external fixators. J. Biomech. Engng, 1990, 112, 15–20.
