In contrast to the conventional aerodynamic and high-order Taylor series models, the model of wavelet transform is defined. This model is a black box model and has a better efficiency in comparison to the conventional models. The wavelet model can be used as a function of high-order aerodynamic derivatives to estimate the aerodynamic behaviour of an aircraft. Different wavelet aerodynamic model structures are made and evaluated. The results show that these non-parametric models are efficient models, and in comparison to high-order Taylor aerodynamic derivatives, the number of terms and the complexity of the model are reduced.
HamelP. G.JategaonkarR. V.Evolution of flight vehicle system identificationJ. Aircr.33119969–28
2.
KalmanR. E.A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problemsTrans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Ser. D J. Basic Eng.82196035–45
3.
AstromK. J.BohlinT.Numerical identification of dynamic systems from normal operating records In Proceedings of the 2nd IFAC Symposium onTheory of self-adaptive control systems, UK (Ed. HammondP. H.), 1965, pp. 96–111 (Plenum, New York)
4.
ZadehL. A.From circuit theory to system theoryProc. IRE501962856–865
5.
MorelliE. A.KleinV.Application of system identification to aircraft at NASA Langley Research CenterJ. Aircr.421200512–25
6.
GlauertH. Analysis of phugoids obtained by recording airspeed indicator Aeronautical Research Council R&M 576, January 1919.
7.
NortonF. H. The measurement of the damping in roll on a JN4h in flight NACA Report 170, 1923.
8.
ShinbortM. On the analysis of linear and nonlinear dynamical systems from transient response data NACA TN-3288, December 1954.
9.
ShinbortM. A least square curve fitting method with application to the calculation of stability coefficients from transient response data NACA TN-2341, April 1951.
10.
MillikenW. F.Dynamic stability and control research. In Proceedings of the 3rd Anglo-American Aeronautical Conference, Brighton, UK, 1951, pp. 447–524
11.
GroveR. D.BowlesR. L.MayhewS. C. A procedure for estimating stability and control parameters from flight test data by using maximum likelihood method employing a real time digital system NASA-TN D-6735, May 1972.
12.
TaylorL. W.IliffK. W. System identification using a modified Newton—Raphson method — a FORTRAN program NASA-TN D-6734, May 1972.
13.
HessR. A. On the use of back propagation with feed forward neural networks for the aerodynamic estimation problem AIAA paper 93–3638, 1993.
14.
YoussefH. M.JuangJ. C. Estimation of aerodynamic coefficients using neural networks AIAA paper 93–3639, 1993.
15.
LinseD. J.StengelR. F.Identification of aerodynamic coefficients using computational neural networksJ. Guid. Control Dyn.16619931018–1025
16.
RokhsazK.SteckJ. E.Use of neural network in control of high-alpha maneuversJ. Guid. Control Dyn.1651993934–939
17.
LekutaiG.Adaptive self-tuning neuro wavelet network controllers Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 31 March 1997.
18.
NaidooA.Demystifying wavelets with application to power engineering Thesis, Department of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Capetown, South Africa, 2005.
19.
PressW.TeukolskyS. A.VetterlingW. T.FlanneryB. P.Numerical recipes in Fortran (New York: Cambridge University Press1992498–499 584–602
20.
MorelliE. A.Global nonlinear modeling using multivariate orthogonal functionsJ. Aircr.3221995270–277
21.
MorelliE. A. Global nonlinear parametric modeling with application to F-16 aerodynamics In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, ACC paper WP04–2, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, June 1998.
22.
MorelliE. A.DeLoachR. Wind tunnel database development using modern experiment design and multivariable orthogonal functions In Proceedings of the 41st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 2003, AIAA paper 2003–0653
23.
MidyaP.Orthogonal estimation algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE Circuits and Systems 42nd Midwest Symposium, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 1999, vol. 2, pp. 583–586
24.
JaramilloP. T.NagatiM. G.Multipoint approach for aerodynamic modeling in complex flow fieldJ. Aircr.32619951335–1341
25.
MaineR. E.IliffK. W.AGARD flight test techniques part 1, vol. 3, 1986, AG300
26.
OzdemirU.JafarovE. M.KavsaogluM. S.Calculation of the longitudinal stability derivatives of a transport aircraft and analysis of longitudinal modes In Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference onAutomatic control, modeling and simulation (ACMOS 07), Istanbul, 27–29 May 2007, pp. 105–110
27.
StevensB. L.LewisF. L.Aircraft control and simulation (New York: John Wiley & Sons 1992)
28.
NelsonR. C.Flight stability and automatic control (New York: McGraw-Hill 1989)
29.
RoskamJ.Airplane flight dynamics and automatic flight controls parts I and II, 1979 (DAR Corporation, Lawrence, Kansas)
30.
KrinoJ.Flight simulation — general definition (Torino, Italy: Politecnico di Torino 1995)
31.
StengleR. F.BerryP. W. Stability and control of maneuvering high performance aircraft NASA Contractor Report-2788, April 1977.
32.
CallahamJ. B.Maximum likelihood estimation of aircraft stability and control coefficients for low to near stall/spin angle of attach Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, 1973.
33.
NievergeletY.Wavelets made easy (Harrisonburg, Virginia: R. R. Donnelly and Sons 1999)
34.
LukR. W.DamperR. I.Nonparametric linear time invariant system identification by discrete wavelet transformsDig. Signal Process.162006303–319
35.
HutchcraftW. E.GordonR. K.Two dimensional high order wavelet-like basis function in the finite element method. In Proceedings of the 34th Southeastern Symposium on System theory (SSST), Huntsville, Alabama, 2002, vol. 34, pp. 138–141
36.
SarrisC. D.KatehiP. B.On the use of wavelet for implementation of high order mesh refinement in time domain simulation In Proceedings of the 30th European Microwave Conference, 2000, vol. 3, pp. 284–287 (CNIT, la Défense, Paris)
37.
DaubechiesI.Orthonormal bases of compactly supported waveletsCommun. Pure Appl. Math.411988906–966
38.
LyshevskiS. E.DunipaceK. R.ColgrenR. C. Identification and reconfigurable control of multivariable aircraft In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Diego, California, June 1999.
39.
YingC. M.JosephB. Process identification using polynomial models In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1998.
40.
LyshevskiS. E.Identification of nonlinear flight dynamics: Theory and practiceIEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst.3622000383–392
41.
HuangY.An algorithm for nonparametric model identification and cure fitting In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference onSystems, man and cybernetics, San Diego, California, 11–14 October 1998, vol. 5, pp. 4353–4356 (IEEE)
42.
OzdemirU.KavsaogluM. S.Linear and nonlinear simulation of aircraft dynamics using body axis systemInt. J. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol.8062008638–648
