A method to efficiently generate a complete aerodynamic description for projectile flight dynamic modelling is described. At the core of the method is an unsteady, time accurate computational fluid dynamic simulation that is tightly coupled to a rigid projectile flight dynamic simulation. A set of short time snippets of simulated projectile motion at different Mach numbers is computed and employed as baseline data. For each time snippet, aerodynamic forces and moments and the full rigid body state vector of the projectile are known. With time synchronized air loads and state vector information, aerodynamic coefficients can be estimated with a simple fitting procedure. By inspecting the condition number of the fitting matrix, it is straightforward to assess the suitability of the time history data to predict a selected set of aerodynamic coefficients. The technique it is exercised on an exemplar fin-stabilized projectile with good results.
SunJ.CummingsR.Evaluation of missile aerodynamic characteristics using rapid prediction techniques. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 21(6), 513–520, 1984.
2.
MooreF.The 2005 version of the Aeroprediction Code (AP05). In the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Providence, Rhode Island, 2004, AIAA paper 2004–4715.
3.
SooyT.SchmidtR.Aerodynamic predictions, comparisons, and validations using missile DATCOM and aeroprediction 98. In the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2004, AIAA paper 2004–1246.
4.
SimonJ.BlakeW.Missile DATCOM-high angle of attack capabilities. In the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland, Oregon, 1999, AIAA paper 1999–4258.
5.
NeelyA.AumanI.Missile DATCOM transonic drag improvements for hemispherical nose shapes. In the AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2003, AIAA paper 2003–3668.
6.
BlakeW.Missile DATCOM-1997 status and future plans. In the AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 1997, AIAA paper 1997–2280.
7.
DupuisA.BernerC.Wind tunnel tests of a long range artillery shell concept. In the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Monterey, California, 2002, AIAA paper 2002–4416.
8.
BernerC.DupuisA.Wind tunnel tests of a grid fin projectile configuration. In the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 2001, AIAA paper 2001–0105.
9.
EvansJ.Prediction of tubular projectile aerodynamics using the ZUES Euler code. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 1989, 26(5), 314–321.
10.
SturekW.NietubiczC.SahuJ.WeinachtP.Applications of computational fluid dynamics to the aerodynamics of army projectiles. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 1994, 31(2), 186–199.
11.
NuscaM.ChakravarthyS.GoldbergU.Computational fluid dynamics capability for the solid-fuel ramjet projectile. J. Propuls. Power, 6(3), 1990, 256–262.
12.
SiltonS.Navier-Stokes Computations for a spinning projectile from subsonic to supersonic speeds. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 2005, 42(2), 223–231.
13.
DeSpiritoJ.VaughnM.WashingtonD.Numerical investigation of canard-controlled missile with planar grid fins. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 2003, 40(3), 363–370.
WeinachtP.Navier-Stokes prediction of the individual components of the pitch damping sum. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 1998, 35(5), 598–605.
16.
GuidosB.WeinachtP.DollingD.Navier-Stokes computations for pointed, spherical, and flat tipped shells at Mach 3. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 1992, 29(3), 305–311.
17.
SahuJ.NietubiczC. J.Application of chimera technique to projectiles in relative motion. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 1995, 32(5), 795–800.
18.
ParkS.KwonJ.Navier-Stokes computations of stability derivatives for symmetric projectiles. In the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 2004, AIAA paper 2004–0014.
19.
SahuJ.Numerical simulations of supersonic flow over an elliptic-section projectile with jet-interaction. In the AIAA Aerodynamics Conference, St. Louis, MO, 24–27 June 2002, AIAA paper 2002-3260.
20.
QinN.LudlowK.ShawS.EdwardsJ.DupuisA.Calculation of pitch damping for a flared projectile. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 1997, 34(4), 566–568.
21.
WeinachtP.Coupled CFD/GN&C modeling for a smart material canard actuator. In the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Providence, Rhode Island, 2004, AIAA paper 2004–4712.
22.
ParkS.KimY.KwonJ.Prediction of dynamic damping coefficients using unsteady dual time stepping method. In the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 2002, AIAA paper 2002–0715.
23.
DeSpiritoJ.HeaveyK.CFD computation of magnus moment and roll-damping moment of a spinning projectile. In the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Providence, Rhode Island, 2004, AIAA paper 2004–4713.
24.
SahuJ.HeaveyK. R.Unsteady CFD modeling of micro-adaptive flow control for an axisymmetric body. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., 2006, 20(5), 271–278.
25.
GaronK.AbateG.HathawayW.Free-flight testing of a generic missile with MEMs protuberances. In the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 2003, AIAA paper 2003–1242.
26.
KruggelB.High angle of attack free flight missile testing. In the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 1999, AIAA paper 1999–0435.
27.
DanbergJ.SigalA.CleminsI.Aerodynamic characteristics of a family of cone-cylinder-flare projectiles. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 27(4), 1990.
28.
DupuisA.Free-flight aerodynamic characteristics of a practice bomb at subsonic and transonic velocities. In the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Monterey, California, 2002, AIAA paper 2002–4414.
29.
AbateG.DuckerscheinR.HathawayW.Subsonic/transonic free-flight tests of a generic missile with grid fins. In the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 2000, AIAA paper 2000–0937.
30.
ChapmanG.KirkD.A method for extracting aerodynamic coefficients from free-flight data. AIAA J., 1970, 8(4), 753–758.
31.
AbateG.KlomfassA.Affect upon aeroballistic parameter identification from flight data errors. In the AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, 2005.
32.
AbateG.KlomfassA.A new method for obtaining aeroballistic parameters from flight data. In the Aeroballistic Range Association Meeting, Freiburg, Germany, 2004.
33.
WeinachtP.SturekW.SchiffL.Projectile performance, stability, and free-flight motion prediction using computational fluid dynamics. J. Spacecr. Rockets, 2004, 41(20), 257–263.
34.
SahuJ.Time-accurate numerical prediction of free-flight aerodynamics of a finned projectile. In the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, San Francisco, California, 2005, AIAA paper 2005–5817.
35.
EtkinB.Dynamics of atmospheric flight, 1972 (John Wiley & Sons, USA).
36.
PeroomianO.ChakravarthyS.GoldbergU.A ‘grid-transparent’ methodology for CFD. In the 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 1997, AIAA paper 97–07245.
37.
PeroomianO.ChakravarthyS.PalaniswamyS.GoldbergU.Convergence acceleration for unified-grid formulation using preconditioned implicit relaxation. In the 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 12–15 January 1998, AIAA paper 98–0116.
38.
GoldbergU. C.PeroomianO.ChakravarthyS.A wall-distance-free K-E model with enhanced near-wall treatment. ASME J. Fluids Eng., 1998, 120, 457–462.
39.
BattenP.GoldbergU.ChakravarthyS.Sub-grid turbulence modeling for unsteady flow with acoustic resonance. In Proceedings of the 38th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 2000, AIAA paper 2000–0473.
