This work compares the principle of a basic fin-controlled sounding rocket with coupled computational fluid dynamic and rigid body dynamic simulations of two coupling environments: (1) a low-fidelity approach using Missile DATCOM as semi-empirical aerodynamic solver, and (2) a high-fidelity approach using DLR TAU as URANS CFD code. The flight mechanics solver REENT is used in both cases. A closed-loop flight path control is developed and adjusted via low-fi simulations and then verified via high-fi simulations. For simple roll and pitching maneuvers the environments match well, whereas differences can be seen in complex maneuvers, e.g. body–body interactions of separation procedures.
Merrem C, Kiehn D, Wartemann V, et al. Aerodynamic design of a reusable booster stage flight experiment. In: 8th European conference for aeronautics and space sciences, EUCASS, Madrid, Spain, 1-4 July 2019, p. 15.
2.
Reimann B. Simulation of support module separation in a hypersonic flight experiment, HiSST 2018-1091. In: HiSST: International conference on high-speed vehicle science technology, Moscow, Russia, 2018, p. 10.
3.
CostelloMSahuJ. Using computational fluid dynamic/rigid body dynamic results to generate aerodynamic models for projectile flight simulation. Proc I MechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering2008; 222: 1067–1079.
4.
Sahu J, Fresconi F and Heavey KR. Unsteady aerodynamic simulations of a finned projectile at a supersonic speed with jet interaction. In: 32nd AIAA Applied aerodynamics conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2014, pp.1–35.
5.
Sahu J and Fresconi F. Flight behaviors of a complex projectile using a coupled CFD-based simulation technique: free motion. In: 34th AIAA Applied aerodynamics conference, June 2015, pp.1–21.
6.
Silton SI, Sahu J and Fresconi F. Comparison of uncoupled and coupled CFD-based simulation techniques for the prediction of the aerodynamic behavior of a complex projectile. In: 34th AIAA Applied aerodynamics conference, Washington D.C., USA, June 2016, pp.1–23.
7.
Morton SA, Görtz S and Mcdaniel DR. Computational aircraft and armament stability and control techniques applied to the F-16. In: International Test and Evaluation Association (ITEA) stores compatibility symposium XIV, Fort Walton Beach, USA, 2006, pp.1–26.
8.
Schwamborn D, Gerhold T and Heinrich R. The DLR TAU-Code: recent applications in research and industry. In: European conference on computational fluid dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD 2006, 2006, pp.1–25.
9.
Mack A and Hannemann V. Validation of the unstructured DLR-TAU-Code for hypersonic flows. In: 32nd AIAA Fluid dynamics conference and exhibit, AIAA Paper 2002-3111, St. Louis, MO, 2002, pp.1–9. St. Louis.
10.
Wada Y and Liou MS. A flux splitting scheme with high-resolution and robustness for discontinuities. AIAA Paper 94-0083, 1994, pp.1–23.
11.
Heinrich R and Michler A. Unsteady simulation of the encounter of a transport aircraft with a generic gust by CFD flight mechanics coupling. In: Proceedings of the CEAS conference, Manchester, UK, 2009.
12.
Vukelich SR, Stoy SL, Burns KA, et al. Missile Datcom, Volume I - Final Report, AFWAL-TR-86-3091. Technical report, McDonnell Douglas Missile Systems Company, Saint Louis, MI, USA, 1988.
13.
Vukelich SR, Stoy SL and Moore ME. Missile Datcom, Volume II - User's Manual, AD-A210 128. Technical report, McDonnell Douglas Missile Systems Company, Saint Louis, MI, USA, 1988.
14.
Blake WB. Missile Datcom, User Manual, AFRL-VA-WP-TR-1998-3009. Technical Report December 1997, Air Force Research Laboratory, Air Vehicles Directorate, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, USA, 1998.
15.
Burkhardt J. Konzeptioneller Systementwurf und Missionsanalyse für einen auftriebsgestützten Rückkehrkörper. PhD Thesis, University of Stuttgart, Germany, 2001.
16.
Eggers T and Gräßlin M. Layout of hypersonic vehicles by coupling of aerodynamics and flight mechanics. In: 2nd International ARA days, October 2008.
17.
CalvoJBWolkowSEggersT. Application of a coupling of flight mechanics and aerodynamics to predict the SHEFEX I ascent phase. New Results Numer Exp Fluid Mech2013; 8: 67–74.
18.
Franze M. SHEFEX II - a first aerodynamic and atmospheric post-flight analysis. In: AIAA Atmospheric flight mechanics conference, San Diego, USA, 4-8 January 2016.
19.
U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1962. Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, United States Air Force, United States Weather Bureau, 1962.
20.
HedinAE. Extension of the MSIS thermosphere model into the middle and lower atmosphere. J Geophys Res1991; 96: 1159–1172.
FarhatCLesoinneM. Two efficient staggered algorithms for the serial and parallel solution of three-dimensional nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2000; 182: 499–515.
RoachePJ. Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J Fluids Eng1994; 116: 405–413.
25.
SooyTJSchmidtRZ. Missile DATCOM (97) and Aeroprediction 98 (AP98). J Spacecraft Rockets2005, pp. 42.
26.
Klevanski J, Ecker T, Riehmer J, et al. Aerodynamic studies in preparation for CALLISTO - reusable VTVL launcher first stage demonstrator, IAC-18- D2.6.3. In: 69th International astronautical congress (IAC), Bremen, Germany, 1-5 October 2018, pp.1–5.
