Historically, improvements to the crashworthiness of rolling stock have come about largely through the investigation of accidents. More recently, specific programmes of work have been aimed at providing and validating improved levels of crashworthiness in vehicle design standards. Concurrently with these improvements, vehicle performance continues to advance and, as it does, the general public demands ever-increasing levels of safety; vehicle crashworthiness requirements must hence be continually reassessed. This paper addresses a few areas where enhancement of current standards should be considered to improve vehicle passive safety further.
RasaiahW. G.Watershed UK accidents—lessons learned. Paper presented at IMechE Seminar on What Can Be Realistically Expected from Crashworthiness?, London, 2 May 2001; alsoProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part F, Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 2002, 216 (F2), 109–115.
2.
ScholesA.A review of British Standards for vehicle structural requirements. Paper presented at IMechE Seminar onWhat Can Be Realistically Expected from Crashworthiness?, London, 2 May 2001.
3.
European Union sponsored Project BE-3093, SAFE-TRAIN, ‘Train crashworthiness for Europe—Final Report’, Contract BRPR-CT97_0457, 30 October 2001.
4.
RasaiahW. G. Review of standards for obstacle deflectors. BR Research Report RR-TRS-97-004, April 1997.
5.
RasaiahW. G. Validation of measures to improve driver protection in rail vehicle collisions. BR Research Report RR-STR-96-032, March 1996.
6.
RasaiahW. G. Cost benefits of retrospective modifications to improve driver safety. BR Research Report RR-TRS-97-006, May 1997.
