Structural optimization of the automobile frontal structure for pedestrian protection and the low-speed impact test

Abstract

A variety of regulations are involved in the design of an automobile frontal structure. The regulations are pedestrian protection, the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) part 581 bumper test, and the Research Council for Automobile Repairs (RCAR) test. The frontal structure consists of the bumper system and a crash box that connects the bumper system and the main body. The detailed design of the bumper system is performed to meet two conditions: first, regulation for pedestrian protection (lower-legform impact test); second, FMVSS part 581. In the two regulations, the stiffness requirements of the bumper system conflict with each other. In order to meet lower leg protection, a relatively soft bumper system is required, while a relatively stiff system is typically needed to manage the pendulum impact. A new bumper system is proposed by adding new components and is analysed by using the non-linear finite element method. An optimization problem is formulated to incorporate the analysis results. Each regulation is considered as a constraint from a loading condition, and two loading conditions are used. Response surface approximation optimization is utilized to solve the formulated problem. RCAR requires reduction in the repair cost when an accident happens. The repair cost in a low-speed crash could be reduced by using an energy-absorbing structure such as the crash box. The crash box is analysed by using the non-linear finite element method. An optimization problem for the crash box is formulated to incorporate the analysis results. Discrete design using orthogonal arrays is utilized to solve the formulated problem in a discrete space.

Keywords

structural optimization automobile frontal structure pedestrian protection low-speed impact test

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 UNECE/TRANS/WP.29/AC.3/7. Proposal to develop a global technical regulation concerning the protection of pedestrians and other vulnerable road user in collision with vehicles, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2004, available from http://www.unece.org/trans/main/welcwp.htm.

2 UNECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/INF-GR-PS-31, IHRA/PS-WG. Pedestrian traffic accident data, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2003, available from http://www.unece.org/trans/main/welcwp.htm.

Schuster

P. J.

Evaluation of the real-world injury-reduction potential of the proposed European pedestrian ‘leg-form’ impact test using a detailed finite element model of the lower limb. Report, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA, 2000.

4 Commission of the European Communities, Directive 2003/102/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 relating to the protection of the pedestrians and other vulnerable road user in the event of a collision with a motor vehicle and Amending Council Directive 70/156/EEC, Commission of the European Communities, 2003.

5 European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee, Proposals for methods to evaluate pedestrian protection for passenger cars. EECV Working Group 10 Report, 1994.

6 European Enhanced Vehicle-Safety Committee, Improved test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection affected by passenger cars. EECV Working Group 17 Report, 1998.

7 UNECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/INF-GR-PS-143. Proposal for a global technical regulation uniform provision concerning the approval of vehicle with regard to their construction in order to improve the protection and mitigate the severity of injuries to pedestrians and other vulnerable road user in the event of a collision, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2005.

8 UNECE, ECER42. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of bumper standard vehicles with regard to their front and rear protective devices (bumpers, etc.), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 1980.

9 NHTSA, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Part 581, Bumper standard. In Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, vol. 5, 2003 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).

10.

10 RCAR, The procedure for conducting a low speed 15km/hr offset insurance crash test to determine the damageability and repairability features of motor vehicles, Research Council for Automobile Repairs, 2006, available from http://www.rcar.org/papers/rcar_test_protocol_angled_barrier.pdf.

11.

Han

Y. H.

Lee

Y. W.

Development of a vehicle structure with enhanced pedestrian safety. SAE paper 2003-01-1232, 2003.

12.

Min

J. S.

Optimization of the energy absorber in an automobile bumper using sequential algorithm with orthogonal arrays (in Korean). Master's Thesis, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2006.

13.

McMahon

Moojiman

Shuler

Engineering thermoplastic energy absorber solutions for pedestrian impact. SAE paper 2002-01-1225, 2002.

14.

Glasson

Maistre

Laurent

Car front end module structure development regarding pedestrian protection and other mechanical constraints. SAE paper 2001-01-0761, 2001.

15.

Hong

U. P.

Park

G. J.

Determination of the crash pulse and optimization of the crash components using the response surface approximate optimization. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2003, 217, 203–213.

16.

Vanderplaats

G. N.

Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design, 1984 (McGraw-Hill, New York).

17.

Lee

K. H.

Park

G. J.

Robust optimization in discrete design space for constrained problem. AIAA J., 1996, 40(4), 774–780.

18.

Park

G. J.

Analytic methods for design practice, 2007 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).

19.

19 Keyword user's manual, LS-DYNA version 970, 2003 (Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, California).

20.

20 VisualDOC user's manual, VisualDOC version 6.0, 2006 (Vanderplaats Research & Development, Inc., Colorado Springs, Colorado).

21.

Emmanuel

Valérie

Claude

Car front end module structure development regarding pedestrian protection and other mechanical constraints. SAE paper 2001-01-0761, 2001.

22.

22 International harmonized research activities. Pedestrian Safety Working Group - 2001 Report, 2001, available from www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/ihra.

23.

Lee

K. H.

Joo

W. S.

Optimum design of an automobile front bumper using orthogonal array (in Korean). Trans. KSAE, 2002, 10(6), 125–132.

24.

Avery

Nolan

J. M.

Brumbelow

Zuby

D. S.

Important considerations in the development of a test to promote stable bumper engagement in low speed crashes, Thatcham, The Motor Insurance Repair Research Centre, Thatcham, Berkshire, UK, 2002, available from http://www.thatcham.org/safety/pdfs/bumper_test_development.pdf.

25.

Yamazaki

Han

Maximization of the crushing energy absorption of tubes. Struct. Optimization, 1998, 16, 37–46.

26.

Kurtaran

Eskandarian

Marzougui

Bedewi

N. E.

Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface optimizatons. Comput. Mechanics, 2002, 29, 409–421.

27.

Khuri

A. I.

Cornell

J. A.

Response surfaces: design and analyses, 2nd edition, 1996 (Marcel Dekker, New York).

28.

Lee

K. H.

J. W.

Park

J. S.

Park

G. J.

An optimization algorithm using orthogonal arrays in discrete design space for structure. Finite Elements Analysis Des., 2003, 40(1), 121–135.

29.

Clemo

Davies

The practicalities of pedestrian protection. In Proceedings of the 16th International Technical Conference on The enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV), Windsor, Ontario, Canada, 31 May-4 June 1998, paper 98-S10-P16 (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).

30.

Kang

W. J.

Bae

H. I.

Optimization of an auto-body front structure for reducing the repair cost in low speed crash (in Korean). In Proceedings of the KSAE Spring Conference, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 2002, pp. 592–597 (Korean Society of Automotive Engineers, Seoul).

31.

Redhe

Nilsson

Bergman

Stander

Shape optimization of a vehicle crash-box using LS-OPT. In Proceedings of the Fifth European LS-DYNA User Conference, Birmingham, UK, 25-26 May 2005.