Lower extremity injuries account for over 50% of pedestrian orthopedic injuries in car-to-pedestrian collisions. Pedestrian finite element models are useful tools for studying pedestrian safety, but current models use simplified knee models that exclude potentially important stabilizing knee components. The effect of these stabilizing components in pedestrian impacts is currently unknown. The goal of this study was to develop a detailed lower-extremity model to investigate the effect of these stabilizing components on pedestrian biomechanics. In this study the Global Human Body Model Consortium male 50th percentile pedestrian model lower body was updated to include various stabilizing knee components, enhance geometric anatomical accuracy of previously modeled soft tissue structures, and update hard and soft tissue material models. The original and updated models were compared across 13 validation tests and the updated model reported significantly (p = 0.01) larger CORA scores (0.73 ± 0.15) than the original model (0.56 ± 0.20). To investigate the effect of the new stabilizing knee components the updated model had its stabilizing components severed. The severed and intact models were impacted by the EuroNCAP SUV and family car models at 30 and 40 km/h. The intact and severed models reported nearly identical head impact times, wrap around distances, and lower-extremity injury outcomes in all four impacts, but the stabilizing components reduced the varus knee angle of the secondarily impacted leg by up to 4.9°. The stabilizing components may prevent secondary impacted leg injuries in lower intensity impacts but overall had little effect on pedestrian biomechanical outcomes.
NHTSA. Early estimate of motor vehicle traffic fatalities in 2019. Washington, DC: NHTSA, 2020.
2.
MizunoY. Summary of IHRA pedestrian safety WG activities proposed test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection afforded by passenger cars. In: Proceedings of 18nd ESV conference, Nagoya, Japan, 2003.
3.
ReithGLeferingRWafaisadeA, et al. Injury pattern, outcome and characteristics of severely injured pedestrian. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med2015; 23: 56.
4.
PengRYBongardFS. Pedestrian versus motor vehicle accidents: an analysis of 5,000 patients. J Am Coll Surg1999; 189(4): 343–348.
5.
BlincoeLMillerTZaloshnjaE, et al. The economic impact of motor vehicle crashes, 2010. NHTSA technical report, 2015.
SongEPetitPTrosseilleX, et al. New reference PMHS tests to assess whole-body pedestrian impact using a simplified generic vehicle front-end. Stapp Car Crash J2017; 61: 299–354.
11.
IwamotoMKisanukiYWatanabeI, et al. Development of a finite element model of the total human model for safety (THUMS) and application to injury reconstruction. In: IRCOBI conference, Munich, Germany, 2002, pp.31–42.
12.
GrindleDPakWGuleyupogluB, et al. A detailed finite element model of a mid-sized male for the investigation of traffic pedestrian accidents. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2021; 235: 300–313.
13.
DrakeRVoglAWMitchellA. Gray’s Anatomy for Students. Elsevier Health, 2019.
14.
WuXDYuJHZouT, et al. Corrigendum: anatomical characteristics and biomechanical properties of the oblique popliteal ligament. Sci Rep2017; 7: 46117.
15.
BeidokhtiHNJanssenDvan de GroesS, et al. The peripheral soft tissues should not be ignored in the finite element models of the human knee joint. Med Biol Eng Comput2018; 56: 1189–1199.
16.
RobinsonJRSanchez-BallesterJBullAMJ, et al. The posteromedial corner revisited. An anatomical description of the passive restraining structures of the medial aspect of the human knee. J Bone Joint Surg2004; 86-B: 674–681.
17.
DommelenJIvarssonBJolandanM, et al. Characterization of the rate-dependent mechanical properties and failure of human knee ligaments. SAE technical paper 2005-01-0293, 2005.
18.
NetterF. Atlas of human anatomy. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2019.
19.
LaPradeRFBollomTSWentorfFA, et al. Mechanical properties of the posterolateral structures of the knee. Am J Sports Med2006; 33: 1386–1391.
20.
HelitoCPBonadioMBRozasJS, et al. Biomechanical study of strength and stiffness of the knee anterolateral ligament. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2016; 17: 193.
21.
BoseDBhallaKSUntaroiuCD, et al. Injury tolerance and moment response of the knee joint to combined valgus bending and shear loading. J Biomech Eng2008; 130: 031008.
22.
TangJZhouQNieB, et al. Obesity effects on pedestrian lower extremity injuries in vehicle-to-pedestrian impacts: A numerical investigation using human body models. Traffic Inj Prev2020; 21: 569–574.
23.
RistaniemiAStenrothLMikkonenS, et al. Comparison of elastic, viscoelastic and failure tensile material properties of knee ligaments and patellar tendon. J Biomech2018; 79: 31–38.
24.
RachmatHHJanssenDVerkerkeGJ, et al. Material properties of the human posterior knee capsule. Biomed Mater Eng2015; 25: 177–187.
25.
KarthikeyanB. Characterization of the compressive impact response of muscles. New Delhi: Department of Mechanical Engineering: Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, 2009.
26.
LimJHongJChenWW, et al. Mechanical response of pig skin under dynamic tensile loading. Int J Impact Eng2011; 38: 130–135.
27.
ShergoldOAFleckNARadfordD. The uniaxial stress versus strain response of pig skin and silicone rubber at low and high strain rates. Int J Impact Eng2006; 32: 1384–1402.
28.
UntaroiuCDIvarssonJGenoveseDR, et al. Biomechanical injury response of leg subjected to combined axial compressive and bending loading. Biomed Sci Instrum2008; 44: 141–146.
29.
ComleyKFleckN. The compressive response of porcine adipose tissue from low to high strain rate. Int J Impact Eng2012; 46: 1–10.
30.
NieBFormanJLPanzerMB, et al. Fiber-based modeling of in situ ankle ligaments with consideration of progressive failure. J Biomech2017; 61: 102–110.
31.
GierczyckaDCroninD. Importance of impact boundary conditions and pre-crash arm position for the prediction of thoracic response to pendulum, side sled, and near side vehicle impacts. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng2021; 24: 1531–1544.
32.
LS-DYNA Support. LS-DYNA support: Element locking. LS-DYNA Support Page. Canonsburg, PA, 2020
33.
GehreCGadesHWernickeP. Objective rating of signals using test and simulation responses. In: Proceedings of the 21st (ESV) international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany, 2009.
34.
KerriganJRDrinkwaterDCKamCY, et al. Tolerance of the human leg and thigh in dynamic latero-medial bending. Int J Crashworthiness2004; 9: 607–623.
35.
AsanumaHYanaokaTTakahashiY. Response corridors to evaluate the biofidelity of the lower limbs of pedestrian dummies. In: 25th International technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV), Detroit, MI, 2017.
36.
FunkJRSrinivasanSCCrandallJR, et al. The effects of axial preload and dorsiflexion on the tolerance of the ankle/subtalar joint to dynamic inversion and eversion. Stapp Car Crash J2002; 46: 245–265.
37.
ShinJUntaroiuCD. Biomechanical and injury response of human foot and ankle under complex loading. J Biomech Eng2013; 135: 101008.
38.
SalzarRSGenoveseDBassCR, et al. Load path distribution within the pelvic structure under lateral loading. Int J Crashworthiness2009; 14: 99–110.
39.
KajzerJSchroederGIshikawaH, et al. Shearing and bending effects at knee joint at high speed lateral loading. In: IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impacts, Hannover, Germany, 1997.
40.
WittekAIshikawaHMatsuiY, et al. Validation and parameter study of a multi-body model for simulation of knee joint responses in lateral impacts representing car-pedestrian accidents: influences of ligament properties and boundary conditions on model responses. In: Proceedings of the 2000 international IRCOBI conference on the biomechanics of impact, Montpellier, France, 2000.
41.
KlugCFeistFRafflerM, et al. Development of a procedure to compare kinematics of human body models for pedestrian simulations. In: IRCOBI, Antwerp, Belgium, 2017.
42.
PakWGrindleDUntaroiuC. The influence of gait stance and vehicle type on pedestrian kinematics and injury risk. J Biomech Eng2021; 143: 101007.
43.
ChenHPoulardDCrandallJR, et al. Pedestrian response with different initial positions during impact with a mid-sized sedan. In: Proceedings of the 24th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2015.
