An approximate method for the evaluation of the roll stiffness of road tankers

Abstract

The rollover stability of tank vehicles depends on a number of factors that result in a lateral shift of the centre of gravity, which influences roll dynamics in cornering. The most important factors are the height of the centre of gravity, the track width, the axle roll stiffness, suspension and tyre compliance, and suspension roll stiffness. A tilt table test and, alternatively, a calculation method are suggested for implementation by United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Regulation 111. In Greece, no available approved testing rig is available to carry out the required tests for the conformity of those vehicles with Regulation 111 and, consequently, the calculation method is almost exclusively adopted. However, the calculation method for Regulation 111 still remains a theoretical way to check the vehicle behaviour owing to the large number of non-validated physical parameters involved. Thus, there is a lack of reliability between results obtained by the calculation method from different inspection bodies for similar vehicles. A combined experimental and calculation method that determines the overall torsion-angular displacement relation for a vehicle on an inclined level under its own weight is discussed, and results of the application of this method in a large series of various types of road tanker are presented in this paper.

Keywords

road tankers rollover stability suspension and tyre compliance suspension roll stiffness UNECE Regulation 111

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cole

D. J.

Fundamental issues in suspension design for heavy road vehicles. Veh. System Dynamics, 2001, 35 (4–5), 319–360.

Fancher

P. S.

Ervin

R. D.

Winkler

C. B.

Gillespie

T. D.

A factbook of the mechanical properties of the components for single-unit and articulated heavy trucks. Technicalreport UMTRI-86–12, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1986.

Dahlberg

Stensson

The dynamic rollover threshold - a heavy truck sensitivity study. Int. J. Veh. Des., 2006, 40 (1–3), 228–250.

Winkler

C. B.

Karamihas

S. M.

Bogard

S. E.

Roll stability performance of heavy vehicle suspensions. In Proceedings of the SAE Technical Paper Series International Truck and Bus Meeting and Exposition, Toledo, Ohio, USA, 1992, pp. 1–14 (Society of Automotive Engineers, New York).

Ervin

R. D.

Dependence of truck roll stability on size and weight variables

Int. J. Veh. Des., 1986, 7 (5–6), 192–208.

Goldman

R. W.

El-Gindy

Kulakowski

B. T.

Rollover dynamics of road vehicles: Literature survey. Heavy Veh. Systems, 2001, 8 (2), 103–141.

Liu

P. J.

Rakheja

Ahmed

A. K. W.

Dynamic roll instability analysis of heavy vehicles using energy approach. Int. J. Heavy Veh. Systems, 2001, 8 (2), 177–195.

Sampson

D. J.M.

Cebon

Active roll control of single unit heavy road vehicles. Veh. System Dynamics, 2003, 40 (4), 229–270.

Lin

R. C.

Cebon

Cole

D. J.

Investigation of active roll control of heavy road vehicles. Veh. System Dynamics, 1994, 23 (Suppl.), 308–321.

10.

Winkler

C. B.

Nisonger

R. L.

Ervin

R. D.

Testing the Michigan double-bottom tanker. SAE paper 781066, 1978, p. 20.

11.

T. T.

Cebon

Analysis of a truck suspension database. Int. J. Veh. Des., Heavy Veh. Systems, 2002, 9 (4), 281–297.

12.

Fancher

P. S.

Mathew

A. A.

A vehicle dynamics handbook for single-unit and articulated heavy trucks. TechnicalReport UMTRI-86–37, University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1987.

13.

Shigley

E. J.

Mischke

R. C.

Budynas

G. R.

Mechanical engineering design, 7th edition, 2003, pp. 969–976 (McGraw-Hill, New York).

14.

Dimarogonas

A. D.

Machine design, a CAD approach, 2001 (John Wiley, New York).