Impact of lean-burn control technology on the fuel economy and NO x emission of gasoline engines

Abstract

Lean-burn engines operate at a very lean air-to-fuel (A/F) ratio under light-load and part-load regions. Because of better combustion in the lean mixture, fuel economy enhancement is the major merit. Lean-burn technologies also give rise to high engine performance and low emission levels (hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide). In the full-load region, the engine operates in the stoichiometric or rich mode. The drawback of the lean-burn engine is its higher nitrogen oxide (NO _x ) emission level. The three-way catalyst acts as a suitable device near stoichiometry; however, it is inefficient when the A/F ratio is far from stoichiometry. Hence, advanced catalysts are needed to carry out the NO _x storage (oxidation) and purge (reduction) operations. This article is concerned with the lean-burn control applications on gasoline engines, which can also be expanded to other types of engine. Case studies on port fuel injection (PFI) and gasoline direct-injection (GDI) engines have been conducted from different points of view. The experimental investigation on a quasi-homogeneous lean-burn PFI engine has been studied from a fuel economy and NO _x reduction viewpoint. The modelling and control approaches are also presented for GDI engines to achieve ultra-lean mixtures for fuel economy enhancement and NO _x emission reduction.

Keywords

lean burn nitrogen oxide emission fuel economy gasoline direct-injection engine port fuel injection engine engine electronic control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ando

Kuwahara

‘Keynote on future combustion engines.’ SAE paper 2001-01-0248, 2001.

Heywood

Internal combustion engine fundamentals (McGraw-Hill 1988)

Stokes

Lake

Christle

‘Improving the NO_x/fuel economy tradeoff for gasoline engine with CCVS combustion system.’ SAE paper 940482, 1994.

Iwamoto

Noma

Nakayama

Yamauchi

Ando

‘Development of gasoline direct injection.’ SAE paper 970541, 1997.

Lumsden

Eddleston

Skyes

‘Comparing lean burn and EGR.’ SAE paper 970505, 1997.

Strehlau

Leyrer

Lox

‘Lean NO _x catalysis to gasoline fueled European cars.’

Automot. Engng 105 (2) (1997): 133–135

Gregory

Marshall

Eves

Dearth

Hepburn

Brogan

Swallow

‘Evolution of lean NO _x -traps on PFI and DISI lean burn vehicles.’ SAE paper 1999-01-3498, 1999.

Brogan

Clark

Spencer

Brisley

‘Recent progress in NO_x-trap technology.’ SAE paper 980933, 1998.

Mohamadian

‘Research on NO _x emission aftertreatment of lean burn gasoline engine using adsorber reduction catalyst.’ In Proceedings of the 2007 ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference and Internal Combustion Engine Spring Technical Conference, Pueblo, Colorado, USA, 13-16 March 2007, paper JRC/ICE2007-40129, pp. 531–536 (ASME International, New York).

10.

Zhang

Liu

‘An electronic control system development of reducing NO _x emission in a quasi-homogeneous lean burn gasoline engine.’

J. Combust. Sci. Technol. 10 (5) (2004): 400–404

11.

Zhang

Sun

Zhang

‘NO _x emission aftertreatment study on lean burn gasoline engine using adsorber reduction catalyst.’ In Proceedings of the 2007 JSAE/SAE International Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, Kyoto, Japan, 23-26 July 2007, JSAE paper 20077033, pp. 1753–1758, SAE paper 2007-01-1932.

12.

Mohamadian

Wang

Zhang

‘An electronic control system for exhaust emissions and fuel economy of quasi-homogenous lean burn gasoline engines.’ In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, New York, USA, 11-13 July 2007, pp. 2973–2978 (IEEE, New York).

13.

Kusell

Moser

Philipp

‘Motronic MED7 for gasoline direct injection engines: engine management system and calibration procedures.’ SAE paper 1999-01-1284, 1999.

14.

Wang

Ramen

Grizzle

J. W.

‘Dynamic modeling of a lean NO _x trap for lean burn engine control.’ In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 2-4 June 1999, vol. 2, pp. 1208–1212 (IEEE, New York).

15.

Cherif

Wissel

‘Modeling and control of a NO _x trap catalyst.’ SAE paper 2000-01-1199, 2000.

16.

Wang

L. Y.

Kolmanovsky

Sun

‘On-line identification and adaptation of LNT models for improved emission control in lean burn automotive engines.’ In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 28-30 June 2000, vol. 2, pp. 1006–1010 (IEEE, New York).

17.

Sun

Kolmanovsky

Brehob

Cook

Buckland

Haghgooie

‘Modeling and control of gasoline direct injection stratified charge (DISC) engines.’ In Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 22-27 August 1999, vol. 1, pp. 471–477 (IEEE, New York).

18.

Asik

Meyer

‘Closed loop temperature control of a lean NO _x trap during desulfation.’ In Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 2-4 June 1999, vol. 2, pp. 1213–1216 (IEEE, New York).

19.

Asik

Farkas

Beier

Meyer

‘Closed loop measurement of NO _x storage capacity and oxygen storage capacity of lean NO _x trap.’ SAE paper 1999-01-1283, 1999.

20.

‘Control options for exhaust gas aftertreatment and fuel economy of GDI engine systems.’ In Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Decision and control (CDC 2003), Maui, Hawaii, USA, 9-12 December 2003, pp. 1783–1788 (IEEE, New York).

21.

‘GDI engine exhaust aftertreatment system analysis and oxygen sensor based identification, modeling and control of lean NO _x trap.’ In Proceedings of the 2003 ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Spring Technical Conference, Salzburg, Austria, 11-14 May 2003, pp. 713–719 (ASME International, New York).