A computational model of the pregnant occupant, which is capable of simulating the dynamic response to acceleration impacts, is introduced. The occupant model represents a 5th percentile female at around the 38th week of pregnancy. A finite element uterus and multi-body fetus is integrated into an existing female model to incorporate pregnant female anthropometry.
The complete model, ‘Expecting’, is used to simulate a range of frontal impacts of increasing severity from 15km/h to 45km/h. Three levels of occupant restraint, completely unrestrained, three-point seat belt, and three-point seat belt with an airbag, are investigated. The strains developed in the uterus because of loading from the seat belt and steering-wheel unit are presented, together with an analysis of stress distribution due to inertial loading of the fetus on the uterus.
The unrestrained cases are shown to be the most dangerous to the fetus, owing to the large interaction with the vehicle steering wheel at the level of the placenta. The use of a three-point seat belt together with a driver airbag appears to offer the greatest protection to the fetus.
HaapaniemiP.‘Women's highway deaths on the rise.’Traffic Safety96 (1996): 6–11.
2.
PearlmanM. D.‘Motor vehicle crashes, pregnancy loss, and preterm labor.’Int. J. Gynec. Obstet.57 (2) (1997): 127–132.
3.
WeissH. B.‘The epidemiology of traumatic injury-related fetal mortality in Pennsylvania, 1995–1997: the role of motor vehicle crashes.’Accid. Anal. Prev.33 (2001): 449–454.
4.
KlinichK. D.SchneiderL. W.RuppJ. D.EbyB.PearlmanM. D.‘Investigations of crashes involving pregnant occupants.’ Report UMTRI-99–200, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1999.
5.
SnyderR. G.SnowC. C.CrosbyW. M.HansonP.FinegJ.ChandlerR.‘Impact injury to the pregnant female and fetus in lap belt restraint.’ In Proceedings of the Tenth Stapp Car Crash Conference, 1966, pp. 249–259 (SAE International, Warrendale, Pennsylvania).
6.
CrosbyW. M.SnyderR. G.SnowC. C.HansonP. G.‘Impact injuries in pregnancy.’Am. J. Obstet. Gynec.101 (1) (1968): 100–110.
7.
PearlmanM. D.VianoD.‘Automobile crash simulation with the first pregnant crash test dummy.’Am. J. Obstet. Gynec.175 (1996): 977–981.
8.
RuppJ. D.KlinichK. D.MossS.ZhouL.PearlmanM. D.SchneiderL. W.‘Development and testing of a prototype pregnant abdomen for the small female Hybrid III small female ATD.’Stapp Car Crash J.45 (2001): 61–78.
9.
MoorcroftD.DumaS.StitzelJ.DumaG.‘A finite element and multi-body model of the pregnant female occupant for the analysis of restraint effectiveness.’ SAE paper 2003-01-0157, 2003.
10.
EnglandM. A.A colour atlas of life before birth – normal fetal development (Wolfe Medical Publications1983).
11.
S. Standing, (Ed.-in-chief).
12.
FriedA. M.‘Distribution of the bulk of the normal placenta. Review and classification of 800 cases by ultrasonography.’Am. J. Obstet. Gynec.132 (6) (1978): 675–680.
13.
PepperellR. J.RubensteinE.MacIsaacI. A.‘Motor-car accidents during pregnancy.’Med. J. Aust.1 (1977): 203–205.
14.
BunaiY.NagaiA.NakamuraI.OhyaI.‘Fetal death from abruptio placentae associated with incorrect use of a seatbelt.’Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol.21 (3) (2000): 207–209.
15.
CrosbyW. M.CostiloeJ. P.‘Safety of lap-belt restraint for pregnant victims of automobile collisions.’New Engl. J. Med.284 (1971): 632–636.
16.
AgranP. F.DunkleD. E.WinnD. G.KentD.‘Fetal death in motor vehicle accidents.’Ann. Emergency Med.16 (12) (1987): 1355–1358.
17.
GoodwinT. M.BreenM. T.‘Pregnancy outcome and fetomaternal hemorrhage after noncatastrophic trauma.’Am. J. Obstet. Gynec.162 (3) (1990): 665–671.
18.
PearlmanM. D.TintinalliJ. E.LorenzR. P.‘A prospective controlled study of outcome after trauma during pregnancy.’Am. J. Obstet. Gynec.126 (6) (1990): 1501–1510.
19.
PearlmanM. D.TintinalliJ. E.LorenzR. P.‘Blunt trauma during pregnancy.’New Engl. J. Med.323 (23) (1990): 1609–1613.
20.
RuppJ. D.SchneiderL. W.KlinichK. D.MossS.ZhouJ.PearlmanM. D.‘Design, development, and testing of a new pregnant abdomen for the Hybrid III small female crash test dummy.’ Report UMTRI-2001–07, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2001.
21.
KlinichK. D.SchneiderL. W.EbyB.RuppJ.PearlmanM. D.‘Seated anthropometry during pregnancy.’ Report UMTRI-99–16, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1999.
22.
SnijdersR. J. M.NicolaidesK. H.‘Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks gestation.’Ultrasound Obstet. Gynec.4 (1) (1994): 34–48.
23.
JeantyP.RodeschF.DelbekeD.DumontJ. E.‘Estimation of gestational age from measurements of fetal long bones.’J. Ultrasound Med.3 (2) (1984): 75–79.
24.
Body measurements of boys and girls from birth up to 16.9 years. Information in the form of tables (British Standards Institution1990).
25.
Romro Ed.R.Pilu Ed.G.Jeanty Ed.P.Ghidini Ed.A.Hobbins Ed.J.Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies, 1983, pp. 323–324 (Appleton and Lange, East Norwalk, Connecticut).
26.
‘TNO P Child Dummies (P¾ P3, P6, P10 and P1½). MADYMO database manual, 2003, pp. 297–310 (TNO Automotive, Delft).
27.
De JagerM. K. J.Mathematical head–neck models for acceleration impacts PhD Thesis, Technical University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1996.
28.
PrasadP.KingA. I.‘An experimentally validated dynamic model of the spine.’J. Appl. Mech.41 (1974): 545–550.
29.
SchultzA. B.WarwickD. N.BerksonM. H.NachemsonA. L.‘Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments, part 1. Responses in flexion, extension, lateral bending and torsion.’Trans. ASME, J. Biomech. Eng.101, 46–51.
30.
AcarB. S.WeekesA. M.‘Measurements for pregnant driver comfort and safety.’Int. J. Veh. Des.42 (1) (2006): 101–118.
31.
PearsallG. W.RobertsV. L.‘Passive mechanical properties of uterine muscle (myometrium) tested in vitro.’J. Biomech.11 (1978): 167–176.
HappeeR.RidellaS.NayefA.MorsinkP.de LangeR.BoursR.van HoofJ.‘Mathematical human body models representing a mid size male and a small female for frontal, lateral and rearward impact loading.’ In Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, Montpellier, France, 20–22 September 2000, pp. 67–84 (International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury, Zurich).
34.
‘Facet occupant models.’ In MADYMO human models manual.
35.
HardyW. N.SchneiderL. W.RouhanaS. W.‘Abdominal impact response to rigid-bar, seatbelt, and airbag loading.’Stapp Car Crash J.45 (2001): 1–32.
36.
KullgrenA.LieA.TingvallC.‘Crash pulse recorder – validation in full scale crash tests.’Accid. Analysis Prev.27 (5) (1995): 717–727.
37.
VaratM. S.HusherS. E.‘Crash pulse modelling for vehicle safety research.’ In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference, on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicle (ESV) Nagoya, Japan, 19–22 May 2003, paper 501 (US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC).
