The current article discusses a procedure for the elicitation of product requirements from a target group of users. The use of the method to help develop products with customizable elements is evaluated as this is one area in which this procedure is considered effective. The technique of forming a structured relationship model uses open-ended questions to elicit subject's sensations when using the product under investigation. Inductive content analysis is then performed on the responses to allow a structured relationship model to be developed.
CampbellR.Customer input and customisation, Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age, ch. 32006, pp. 19–37 (John Wiley and Sons, LtdLondon).
2.
DurayR.Mass customization origins: Mass or custom manufacturing? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage.200222(3)314–328.
3.
UlrichK.EppingerS.Product design and development1995 (McGraw-HillUSA).
4.
JiaoJ.TsengM. M.Customizability analysis in design for mass customization. Comput.-Aided Des.200436745–757.
5.
BarrassD. F.The feasibility of sports grips customisation using rapid manufacturing methodologies PhD Thesis, Loughborough University2006.
6.
RobertsJ.JonesR.HarwoodC.MitchellS.RothbergS.Human perceptions of sports equipment under playing conditions. J. Sports Sci.200119485–497.
7.
GouldD.EklundR.JacksonS.1988 U.S. Olympic Wrestling Excellence: I. Mental preparation, precompetitive cognition, and affect. Sport Psychol.19926358–382.
8.
GouldD.EklundR.JacksonS.1988 U.S. Olympic Wrestling Excellence: II. Thoughts and affect occurring during competition. Sport Psychol.19926383–402.
9.
HantonS.JonesG.The acquisition and development of cognitive skills and strategies in making the butterflies fly in formation. Sport Psychol.199913(1)1–21.
10.
ScanlanT.RavizzaK.SteinG.An in-depth study of former elite figure skaters: Introduction to the project. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.198911(1)54–64.
11.
ScanlanT.RavizzaK.SteinG.An in-depth study of former elite figure skaters: Sources of enjoyment. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol.198911(1)65–82.
12.
DaviesG.RothbergS.JonesR.RobertsJ.Player perception evaluation of ‘feel’ in tennis ball impacts. Tennis science and technology2003, pp. 71–78ITFLondon.
13.
YoungC.FlemingP.DixonN.JonesR.RobertsJ.Correlating player performance tests with human perceptions for synthetic field hockey pitches. The Engineering of Sport 5: In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Engineering of Sport Davis, (Eds. HubbardM.MehtaR.PallisJ.)California, USASeptember 2005, pp. 517–523 (ISEA).
14.
RossH.BrodieE.Weber fractions for weight and mass as a function of stimulus intensity. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol.198739A77–88.
15.
BrodyH.Player sensitivity to the moments of inertia of a tennis racket. Sports Eng.20003145–148.
16.
von HippelE.The sources of innovation1988 (Oxford University PressNew York, NY).
17.
CohenL.ManionL.The interview. Research methods in education, 3rd edition1980, pp. 307–335 (RoutledgeLondon, New York).
18.
CloonanT.Experiential and behavioural aspects of decision-making. Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology (Eds. GiorgiA.FischerW.Von EckartsbergR.)1971vol. 1, pp. 112–131, (Duquesne University PressPittsburgh).
19.
PattonM.Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd edition1990 (SAGE PublicationsCalifornia).
20.
GriffinA.HauserJ.Qualitative: The voice of the customer. Mark. Sci.199312(1)1–27.
