The paper presents a method to increase the computational accuracy by preserving additional constraints on the numerical solution. The new technique can noticeably increase the precision of a standard finite-volume flow solver by a modification to the flux computation procedure without changing its essential features. The efficiency of this method is demonstrated by application to the prediction of sound from high-speed helicopter blades. Several open domain boundary conditions for this application are also developed and compared for a model problem of a two-dimensional transonic aerofoil in an unsteady free stream.
ChorinA. J.Numerical solutions of the Navier-Stokes equation. Math. Comp., 1968, 22, 745–762.
2.
ThorrilhonM.Locally divergence-preserving upwind finite-volume-schemes for magnetohydrodynamics. SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 2005, 26 (4), 1166–1191.
3.
EkaterinasJ. A.Aeroacoustic predictions using high-order shock-capturing schemes. Int. J. Aeroacous., 2003, 2 (2), 175–192.
4.
GrivelliniA.BassiF.A three-dimensional parallel discontinuous Galerkin solver for acoustic propagation studies. Int. J. Aeroacous., 2003, 2 (2), 157–173.
5.
BaselB. D.GrunewaldM.Solution of the 3D linearised Euler equations for acoustical propagation around bodies. In Proceedings of the 6th CEAS-ASC Workshop: From CFD to CAA, NTUA, Athens, Greece, 2002, 1–30.
6.
DjambazovG. S.LaiC.-H.PericleousK. A.WangZ.-K.Analysis of a defect correction method for computational aeroacoustics. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Domain decomposition methods, Lyon, France, 2001, 1–8.
7.
AbalakinI.DervieuxA.KozubskayaT.On accuracy of noise direct calculation based on Euler model. Int. J. Aeroacous., 2004, 3 (1), 87–110.
8.
Van DykeM.Perturbation methods in fluid mechanics, 1975 (The Parabolic Press).
9.
MorgansA. S.KarabasovS. A.DowlingA. P.HynesT. P.Transonic helicopter noise. In Proceedings of the 59th American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, Acoustics paper 4, Phoenix, USA, 2003, 1–10.
10.
MorgansA. S.DowlingA. P.The aeroacoustics of transonic helicopter blades. In Proceedings of the 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA paper 2002–2545, Breckenridge, USA, 2002, 1–10.
BeaumierP.ChelliP.PahlkeK.Navier-Stokes prediction of helicopter rotor performance in hover including aeroelastic effects. J. AHS, 2001, 46 (4), 301–309.
13.
SrinivasanG. R.BaederJ. D.TURNS: A free wake Euler/Navier-Stokes numerical method for helicopter rotors. AIAA Techn. Notes, 1992, 31 (5), 959–962.
14.
ShawS. T.QinN.Unsteady flow around helicopter rotor blade sections in forward flight. Aeronaut. J. Royal Aeronaut. Soc., 1999, 103, 35–44.
15.
AllenC. B.The reduction of numerical entropy generated by unsteady shockwaves. Aeronaut. J., 1997, 101, 9–16.
16.
KraenieE.HertelJ.WagnerS.Euler procedure for calculation of the steady rotor flow with emphasis on wake evolution. In Proceedings of the 8th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 1990, Technical paper AIAA-1990–3007.
17.
ChenC. L.McCroskeyW. J.ObayashiS.Numerical solution of forward-flight rotor flow using an upwind method. J. Aircr., 1991, 28, 374–380.
18.
StrawnR. S.DjomehriM. J.Computational modeling of hovering rotor and wake aerodynamics. J. Aircraft, 2002, 39 (5), 786–793.
19.
ZhongB.QinN.Non-inertial multiblock Navier-Stokes calculation for hovering rotor flow fields using relative velocity approach. Aeronaut. J., 2001, 105, 379–389.
20.
KarabasovS. A.HynesT. P.Open boundary conditions of predictor-corrector type for external flows. In Proceedings of the 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA paper 2002–2442, Breckenridge, CO, USA, 2002, 1–11.
21.
BadcockK. J.GaitondeA. L.An unfactored implicit moving mesh method for the two-dimensional unsteady N-S equations. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 1996, 23, 607–632.
22.
Ryaben'kiiV. S.TsynkovS. V.An application of the difference potentials method to solving external problems in CFD. In Computational fluid dynamics review (Eds HafezMOshimaK), Vol. 1, 1998, pp. 169–205 (World Scientific, Singapore).
RowleyC. W.ColoniusT.Discretely nonreflecting boundary conditions for linear hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys., 2000, 157, 500–538.
28.
HixonR.ShihS. -H.MankbadiR. R.Evaluation of boundary conditions for computational aeroacoustics. AIAA J., 1995, 33 (11), 2006–2012.
29.
TamC. K. W.WebbJ. C.Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys., 1993, 107, 262–281.
30.
TamC. K. W.DongZ.Radiation and outflow boundary conditions for direct computation of acoustic and flow disturbances in a non-uniform mean flow. J. Comput. Acoust., 1996, 4, 175–201.
31.
HuF. Q.On absorbing boundary conditions for linearized Euler equations by a perfectly matched layer. J. Comput. Phys., 1996, 129, 201–219.
32.
HuF. Q.A stable perfectly matched layer for linearized Euler equations in unsplit physical variables. J. Comput. Phys., 2001, 173, 455–480.
