Surface roughness of the datum face is an important criterion to be considered for the selection of the datum during set-up planning as it can affect the tolerances among features. In this work, an experimental study on the effect of datum surface roughness on parallelism and perpendicularity tolerances in machining of prismatic parts by milling is carried out. A simplified mathematical model is developed to analyse the experimental findings. Statistical analysis of the experimental results has also been carried out. It is observed that sometimes a rough datum can provide better parallelism and perpendicularity than the smooth datum. Thus, the surface roughness of the datum should be decided judiciously considering the prescribed geometric tolerances and machining characteristics on a particular machine tool as well as the required surface integrity.
Senthil KumarA.NeeA. Y. C.PrombanpongS., ‘Expert fixture-design system for an automated manufacturing environment’Computer-Aided Des., 24 (1992): 316–326.
RoyU.SunP. L., ‘Selection of preliminary locating and clamping positions on a workpiece for an automatic fixture design system’Computer Integrated Mfg Systems, 7 (1994): 161–172.
4.
MeiJ.ZhangH. C.OldhamW. J. B., ‘A neural networks approach for datum selection’Computers in Industry, 27 (1995): 53–64.
5.
HuangS. H.XuN., ‘Automatic set-up planning for metal cutting: An integrated methodology’Int. J. Prod. Res., 41 (2003): 4339–4356.
6.
GuoY. W.MilehamA. R.OwenG. W.MaropoulosP. G.LiW. D., ‘Operation sequencing optimization for five-axis prismatic parts using a particle swarm optimization approach’Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture223 (B5) (2009): 485–497 DOI: 10.1243/09544054JEM1224.
7.
HuangS. H.LiuQ.MusaR., ‘Tolerance-based process plan evaluation using Monte Carlo simulation’Int. J. Prod. Res., 42 (2004): 4871–4891.
8.
DjurdjanovicD.NiJ., ‘Dimensional errors of fixtures, locating and measurement datum features in the stream of variation modeling in machining’Trans. ASME, J. Mfg Sci. Engng, 125 (2003): 716–730.
9.
QinG.ZhangW.WuZ.WanM., ‘Systematic modeling of workpiece-fixture geometric default and compliance for the prediction of workpiece machining error’Trans. ASME, J. Mfg Sci. Engng, 129 (2007): 789–801.
HebbalS. S.MehtaN. K., ‘Setup planning for machining the features of prismatic parts’Int. J. Prod. Res., 46 (2008): 3241–3257.
12.
OngS. K.NeeA. Y. C., ‘A Systematic Approach for Analyzing the Fixturability of Parts for Machining’Trans. ASME, J. Mfg Sci. Engng, 120 (1998): 401–408.
13.
OngS. K.NeeA. Y. C., ‘Process modelling and formulation for the development of an intelligent set-up planning system’Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture209 (B6) (1995): 455–467.
14.
LeeN. K. S.ChenJ. Y.JonejaA., ‘Effects of surface roughness on multi-station mechanical alignment processes’Trans. ASME, J. Mfg Sci. Engng, 123 (2001): 433–444.
15.
DeiabI. M.ElbestawiM. A., ‘Experimental determination of the friction coefficient on the workpiece—fixture contact surface in workholding applications’Int. J. Mach. Tools Mf., 45 (2005): 705–712.
16.
SamantaB.ErevellesW.OmurtagY., ‘Prediction of workpiece surface roughness using soft computing’Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture222 (B10) (2008): 1221–1232 DOI: 10.1243/09544054JEM1035.
17.
DhokiaV. G.KumarS.VichareP.NewmanS. T.AllenR. D., ‘Surface roughness prediction model for CNC machining of polypropylene’Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture222 (B2) (2008): 137–153 DOI: 10.1243/09544054JEM884.
18.
LogothetisN., Managing for total quality: From Deming to Taguchi and Spc (New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India1997).
19.
ShawkiG. S. A.Abdel-AalM. M., ‘Effects of fixture rigidity and wear on dimensional accuracy’Int. J. Mach. Tools Des. Res., 5 (1965): 183–202.
20.
ShawkiG. S. A.Abdel-AalM. M., ‘Rigidity considerations in fixture design—rigidity of clamping elements’Int. J. Mach. Tools Des. Res., 6 (1966): 207–220.
21.
ShawkiG. S. A.Abdel-AalM. M., ‘Rigidity considerations in fixture design—contact rigidity at locating elements’Int. J. Mach. Tools Des. Res., 6 (1966): 31–43.
22.
YehJ. H.LiouF.W., ‘Contact condition modelling for machining fixture setup processes’Int. J. Mach. Tools Mf., 39 (1999): 787–803.
