This paper proposes a biologically inspired collective behaviour for a team of cooperating mobile robots. This behaviour is achieved by controlling the local interactions among a team of identical mobile robots performing a set of simple behaviours in the context of tracking a dynamic target. In general, the behaviours of the individual robots have different aims and this may cause conflict. To address this issue, a fuzzy-logic-based approach for the coordination of multiple behaviours in each robot is proposed. Computer simulation of mobile robots tracking a dynamic target is employed to test this approach. The results show an improvement in overall group performance even in a cluttered environment.
KristinaL.AramG.Mathematical model of foraging in a group of robots: Effect of interference. Autonomous Robots, 2002, 13(2), 127–141.
3.
PhamD. T.AwadallaM. H.Fuzzy logic based behaviour coordination in multi-robot system for dynamic target tracking. In Proceedings of the Third CIRP International Seminar on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering (ICME 2002), Ischia, Naples, Italy, 2002, pp. 456–462.
4.
BrooksR. A.A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J. Robotics Automn, 1986, 2(1), 14–23.
Murrieta-CidR.SarmientoA.HutchinsonS. A.Distributed motion coordination strategy for multiple nonholonomic mobile robots in cooperative hunting operations. Robotics Autonomous Systems, 2003, 43(4), 257–282.
7.
ParkerL. E.Distributed algorithms for multi-robot observation of multiple moving targets. Autonomous Robots, 2002, 12(3), 231–255.
8.
SchultzA. C.ParkerL. E.Multi-robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata, 2002 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).
9.
SteelsL.Cooperation between distributed agents through self-organisation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 1990) (Eds DemazeauY.MüllerJ. P.), 1990, pp. 8–14 (IEEE, New York).
10.
WahdeM.A method for behavioural organization for autonomous robots based on evolutionary optimization of utility functions. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part I: J. Systems and Control Engineering, 2003, 217(14), 249–258.
11.
MartinoliA.IjspeertA. J.GambardellaL. M.A probabilistic model for understanding and comparing collective aggregation mechanisms. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Artificial Life (ECAL99) (Eds FloreanoD.NicoudJ. D.MondadaF.), Lausanne, Switzerland, 1999, pp. 575–584 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
12.
MartinoliA.MondadaF.Collective and co-operative group behaviours: Biologically inspired experiments in robotics. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER-95) (Eds KhatibO.SalisburyJ. K.), Vol. 223, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, California, 1995, pp. 3–10 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
13.
MartinoliA.Swarm intelligence in autonomous collective robotics: From tools to the analysis and synthesis of distributed control strategies. PhD thesis 2069, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1999.
14.
MartinoliA.FranziE.MattheyO.Towards a reliable set-up for bio-inspired collective experiments with real robots. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER-97) (Eds CasalsA.de AlmeidaA. T.), Vol. 232, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 1997, pp. 597–608 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
15.
ChantemargueF.HirsbrunnerB.A collective robotics application based on emergence and self-organisation. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, Nanjing, PR China, 1999, pp. 1–8.
16.
KubeC. R.BonabeauE.Co-operative transport by ants and robots. Robotics Autonomous Systems, 2000, 30(1-2), 85–101.
17.
KubeC. R.ZhangH.The use of perceptual cues in multi-robot box-pushing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1996, pp. 2085–2090 (IEEE, New York).
18.
KubeC. R.ZhangH.Collective robotic intelligence. In From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of the International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1992, pp. 460–468.
19.
SenS.SekaranM.HaleJ.Learning to coordinate without sharing information. In Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, Washington, 1994, pp. 426–431.
20.
PirjanianP.ChristensenH. I.Behaviour co-ordination using multiple-objective decision-making. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Intelligent Systems, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1997, pp. 78–89 (SPIE, Bellingham, Washington).
21.
PirjanianP.Behaviour co-ordination mechanisms–state-of-the-art. Technical Report IRIS-99-375, Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Systems, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, 1999.
22.
PirjanianP.MataricM.Multi-robot target acquisition using multiple objective behaviour coordination. In Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, California, 2000, pp. 101–106 (IEEE, New York).
23.
RosenblattJ.ThorpeC.Combining multiple goals in a behaviour-based architecture. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots (IROS 1995), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1995, Vol. 1, pp. 136–141 (IEEE, New York).
24.
MataricJ.Learning social behavior. Robotics Autonomous Systems, 1997, 20, 191–204.
25.
JungB.GauravS.SukhatmeG. S.Tracking targets using multiple robots: The effect of environment occlusion. Autonomous Robots, 2002, 13(3), 191–205.
26.
ShankirY.Fuzzy logic systems and fuzzy neural networks for dynamic systems modelling and control. PhD thesis, Intelligent Systems Laboratory, Manufacturing Engineering Centre, Cardiff University, 2001.
