For rapid prototyping and tooling, direct laser deposition (DLD) is one of the most promising techniques. The method can be used to produce fully dense metallic parts in a single stage, can be applied to a wide range of metals and metal alloys and, when a coaxial deposition head is used, is flexible enough to allow complex parts to be built. So far, however, almost all the powders chosen for use as the build material in this field have been of the gas-atomized (GA) type, and research has generally been confined to this field. The present paper considers the use of water-atomized (WA) 316L stainless steel powder by comparing it with the more conventional gas-atomized powder used during the laser deposition process. Analysis of the characteristics of multiple-layer clads produced by the two powders reveals some potential benefits of using water-atomized powder: results show that the sidewall finish is smoother and the microstructure finer and more textured, although the deposition rate is considerably lower. Other disparities between parts built using the two powder types are demonstrated, and reasons for the final differences are explored.
LawleyA.Atomization: The Production of Metal Powders, 1992 (Metal Powders Industry Federation, Princeton).
2.
YuleA. J.DunkleyJ. J.DunkleyY.Atomization of Melts: For Powder Production and Spray Deposition, Oxford Series on Advanced Manufacturing, Vol. 11, 1994 (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
3.
DunkleyJ. J.The factors determining the oxygen content of water atomised 304L stainless steel powder. Poroshkovaya Metall., 1976, 165(9), 39.
4.
VaidyanathanK. R.Functional metal, ceramic, and composite prototypes by solid freeform fabrication. JOM, 2000, 52(12), 30.
5.
ChangK.-H.SilvaJ.BryantI.Concurrent design and manufacturing for mechanical systems. Concurrent Engng Res. Applic., 1999, 7(4), 290–308.
HopkinsonN.DickensP.Rapid prototyping for direct manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping J., 2001, 7(4), 197–202.
8.
LewisG. K.SchliengerE.Practical considerations and capabilities for laser assisted direct metal deposition. Mater. Des., 2000, 21(4), 417–423.
9.
SrivastavaD.ChangI. T. H.LorettoM. H.The optimisation of processing parameters and characterisation of microstructure of direct laser fabricated TiAl alloy components. Mater. Des., 2000, 21(4), 425–433.
10.
MilewskiJ. O.DickersonP. G.NemecR. B.LewisG. K.FonsecaJ. C.Application of a manufacturing model for the optimization of additive processing of Inconel alloy 690. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 1999, 91(1–3), 18–28.
11.
MazumderJ.ChoiJ.NagarathnamK.KochJ.HetznerD.Direct metal deposition of H13 tool steel for 3-D components. JOM, 1997, 49(5), 55–60.
12.
SextonL.LavinS.ByrneG.KennedyA.Laser cladding of aerospace materials. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2002, 122, 63–68.
13.
KobrynP. A.MooreE. H.SemiantinS. L.The effect of laser power and traverse speed on microstructure, porosity and build height in laser-deposited Ti-6A1-4V. Scr. Mater., 2000, 43, 299–305.
14.
PelletierJ. M.Laser surface treatment, state of the art and prospects. Proc. SPIE, 1996, 2789, 93–103.
15.
The Pyrometer Handbook, 1999, p. 20 (IMPAC Electronic GmbH).
16.
HofmeisterW.GriffithM.EnszM.SmugereskyJ.Solidification in direct metal deposition by LENS processing. JOM, 2001, 53(9), 30–35.
17.
TunbergT.Powder surface oxidation during production of high alloy PM steels. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, 1995.
18.
AbduhlyahedA. A.RozniatowskiK.KurzydlowskiK. J.Free surface contribution to sensitization of an austenitic stainless steel. J. Mater. Processing Technol., 2001, 109, 2–8.
19.
NetoDiniz O. O.VilarR.Physical-computational model to describe the interaction between a laser beam and a powder jet in laser surface processing. J. Laser Applic., 2002, 14(1), 46–51.
20.
LinJ.Temperature analysis of the powder streams in coaxial laser cladding. Optics and Laser Technol., 1999, 31, 565–570.
21.
FuhrichT.BergerP.HugelH.Marangoni effect in laser deep penetration welding of steel. J. Laser Applic., 2001, 13(5), 178–186.
22.
YeX.-H.ChenX.Three-dimensional modelling of heat transfer and fluid flow in laser full-penetration welding. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2002, 35(10), 1049–1056.
23.
HeipleC. R.RoperJ. R.Mechanism for minor element effect on GTA fusion zone geometry. Wled. J., 1982, 61(4), 97–102.
24.
MillsK. C.KeeneB. J.BrooksR. F.ShiraliA.Marangoni effects in welding. Phil, Trans. R. Soc. (Lond.) A, 1998, 356, 911–925.
25.
LancasterJ. F.MillsK. C.Recommendations for the avoidance of variable penetration in gas tungsten arc welding. International Institute of Welding Document 212–796-91, 1991.
UdaM.OhnoS.Trans. Natn. Res. Inst. for Metals, 1975, 17, 71–78.
28.
LancasterJ. F.Metallurgy of Welding, 6th edition, 1999, pp. 310–352 (Abington Publishing, Cambridge).
29.
KouS.Welding Metallurgy, 1987, p. 66 (John Wiley, New York).
30.
SchaeCerL. A.Constitution diagram for stainless steel weld metal. Metal Prog., 1949, 56(11), 680–680B.
31.
ElmerJ. W.AllenS. M.EagarT. W.Microstructural development during solidification of stainless steel alloys. Metall. Trans. A (Phys. Metall. and Mater. Sci.), 1989, 20A(10), 2117–2131.
32.
NyborgL.TunbergT.WangP. X.OlefjordI.Surface analysis of water-atomised austenitic stainless steel powder. In Proceedings of PM90 World Conference on Powder Metallurgy, London, 1990, pp. 3-199–3-203 (The Institute of Metals, London).
33.
TunbergT.NyborgL.Surface reactions during water atomisation and sintering of austenitic stainless steel powder. Powder Metall., 1995, 38(2), 120–130.
34.
RosenthalD.The theory of moving sources of heat and its application to metal treatments. Trans. ASME, 1946, 849–866.
35.
KearB. H.BreinanE. M.GreenwaldL. E.Solidification and Casting of Metals (Ed. DavisH. A.), 1979, p. 501 (The Metals Society, London).
