Objective measurement and quantification of injury severity are necessary for triage, performance evaluation and research. In order to evaluate interventions, outcomes must also be compared. While this can be done using hospital stay or mortality, these will fail to detect subtle differences. Impact of injury on health can be quantified using a variety of scoring systems. Trauma scoring and outcome measurement have grown increasingly complex in recent years and are likely to become more so in the future.
American Association for Automotive Medicine (now American Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine). 1976. The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 1976 Revision, including dictionary. Des Plaines, Illinois: American Association for Automotive Medicine.
2.
American Association for Automotive Medicine (now American Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine). 1980. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1980 Revision. Des Plaines, Illinois: American Association for Automotive Medicine.
3.
American Association for Automotive Medicine (now American Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine). 1985. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1985 Revision. Des Plaines, Illinois: American Association for Automotive Medicine.
4.
5.
American Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 1990. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 Revision. Des Plaines, Illinois: American Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
6.
American Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 1998. The Abbreviated Injury Scale, 1990 Revision (1998 update). Des Plaines, Illinois: American Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.
7.
Asikainen I, Kaste M, Sarna S.1998. Predicting late outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury referred to a rehabilitation programme: a study of 508 Finnish patients 5 years or more after injury. Brain Inj12: 95-107.
8.
Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WEet al.1976. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care14(1): 57-67.
9.
Boffard KD.2002.Trauma scores and scoring systems. In: Boffard KD ed. Definitive surgical trauma care manual. Pratteln, Switzerland: International Society of Surgery, International Association for the Surgery of Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care (IATSIC). Appendix B, B1-B25.
10.
Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS.1987. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care27(4): 370-378.
11.
Brenneman FD, Redelmeier DA, Boulanger BRet al.1997. Long-term outcomes in blunt trauma: who goes back to work?. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care42(5): 778-781.
12.
Bull JP.1975. The injury severity score of road traffic casualties in relation to mortality, time of death, hospital treatment time and disability. Accident Anal Prevent7: 249-255.
Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WSet al.1989. A revision of the Trauma Score. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care29(5): 623-629.
15.
Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJet al.1990. A new characterization of injury severity. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care30(5): 539-545; discussion 545-46.
16.
Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJet al.1996. Improved predictions from a severity characterization of trauma (ASCOT) over Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): results of an independent evaluation.[comment]. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care40(1): 42-48.
17.
Choi SC, Marmarou A, Bullock Ret al.1998. Primary end points in phase III clinical trials of severe head trauma: DRS versus GOS. The American Brain Injury Consortium Study Group. J Neurotrauma15(10): 771-776.
Cohen ME, Ditunno JF, Donovan WHet al.1998. A test of the 1992 international standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord36: 554-560.
20.
Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety. 1971. Rating the severity of tissue damage: I. The abbreviated scale. JAMA215: 277-280.
21.
Committee on Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety. 1972. Rating the severity of tissue damage: I. The abbreviated scale. JAMA220: 717-720.
Curt A, Dietz V.1999. Electrophysiological recordings in patients with spinal cord injuries: significance for predicting outcome. Spinal Cord37: 554-560.
25.
Dimar JR, Wilde PH, Glassman SDet al.1996. Thoracolumbar burst fractures treated by anterior and posterior surgery. Am J Orthopaedics25: 159-165.
26.
Ditunno JF ed. 1992. ASIA Classification. Standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Illinois, Chicago: American Spinal Injuries Association.
27.
Dombi GW, Nandi P, Saxe JMet al.1995. Prediction of rib fracture injury outcome by an artificial neural network. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care39(5): 915-921.
28.
Dove DB, Stahl, WM, Del Guercio, LRM.1980. A five-year review of deaths following urban trauma. J Trauma20: 760-766.
29.
El Masry WS, Tsubo M, Katoh Set al.1996. Validation of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score and the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) motor score. Spine21(5): 614-619.
30.
Fern KT, Smith JT, Zee Bet al.1998. Trauma patients with multiple extremity injuries: resource utilization and long-term outcome in relation to injury severity scores. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care45(3): 489-494.
31.
Frankel H, Hancock DO, Hyslop G.1969. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia7: 179-192.
32.
Frostick SP, HunterJB. 1993. Complications. In: Carr A. ed. Outcome measures in orthopaedics. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
33.
Gilson B, Gilson J, Bergner Met al.1975. Sickness Impact Profile: development of a health status measure. Am J Public Health65: 1304-1310.
34.
Hannan EL, Farrell LS, Gorthy SFet al.1999. Predictors of mortality in adult patients with blunt injuries in New York State: a comparison of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS). J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care47(1): 8-14.
35.
Helfet DL, Howey T, Sanders Ret al.1990. Limb salvage versus amputation. Preliminary results of the Mangled Extremity Severity Score. Clin Orthop Relat Res256: 80-86.
36.
Hunt S, McEwen J, McKenna S.1985. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J Roy Coll General Practitioners35: 185-188.
37.
Hunter A, Kennedy L, Henry Jet al.2000. Application of neural networks and sensitivity analysis to improved prediction of trauma survival. Comput Methods Programs Biomed62(1): 11-19.
38.
Izenberg SD, Williams MD, Luterman A.1997. Prediction of trauma mortality using a neural network. Am Surgeon63(3): 275-281.
39.
Jennett B, Bond M.1975. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet (I): 480-484.
40.
Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MRet al.1981. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry44(4): 285-293.
Katoh S, El Masry WS, Jaffray Det al.1996. Neurologic outcome in conservatively treated patients with incomplete closed traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries. Spine21: 2345-2351.
43.
Kim NH, Lee HM, Chun IM.1999. Neurologic injury in patients with burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine24: 290-293.
44.
Kingma J, Ten Vergert E, Werkman HAet al.1994. A Turbo Pascal program to convert ICD-9CM coded injury diagnoses into injury severity scores: ICDTOAIS. Perceptual Motor Skills78(3 Pt 1): 915-936.
45.
Knopp R, Yanagi A, Kallsen G.1987. Mechanism of injury and anatomic injury as criteria for prehospital trauma triage. Ann Emerg Med17: 55-55.
46.
Lai YC, Chen FG, Goh MHet al.1998. Predictors of long term outcome on severe head injury. Ann Acad Med Singapore27: 326-331.
47.
Maas AIR, Braakman R, Schoutin HJAet al.1983. Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury. J Neurosurg58: 321-325.
48.
MacKenzie EJ, Steinwachs DM, Shankar BS.1989. Classifying severity of trauma based on hospital discharge diagnoses: validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 conversion table. Med Care27: 412-422.
49.
Marble RP, Healy JC.1999. A neural network approach to the diagnosis of morbidity outcomes in trauma care. Artif Intell Med15(3): 299-307.
50.
Markle J, Cayten CG, Byrne DWet al.1992. Comparison between TRISS and ASCOT methods in controlling for injury severity. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care33(2): 326-332.
51.
Massagli TL, Michaud LJ, Rivara FP.1996. Association between injury indices and outcome after severe traumatic brain injury in children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil77(2): 125-132.
52.
Moore EE, Shackford SR, Pachter HLet al.1989. Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care29(12): 1664-1666.
53.
Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MAet al.1990. Organ injury scaling, II: pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care30(11): 1427-1429.
54.
Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJet al.1992. Organ injury scaling. III: chest wall, abdominal vascular, ureter, bladder, and urethra. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care33(3): 337-339.
55.
Moore EE, Malangoni MA, Cogbill THet al.1994. Organ injury scaling. IV: thoracic vascular, lung, cardiac, and diaphragm. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care36(3): 299-300.
56.
Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJet al.1995a. Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care38(3): 323-324.
57.
Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MAet al.1995b. Organ injury scaling. Surg Clin N Am75(2): 293-303.
Norwood SH, McAuley CE, Berne JDet al.2000. A prehopsital Glasgow Coma Scale Score < = 14 accurately predicts the need for full trauma team activation and patient hospitalisation after motor vehicle collisions. J Trauma53(3): 503-507.
60.
Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins HKet al.1982. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil63: 118-123.
61.
Rutledge R, Fakhry S, Baker Cet al.1993. Injury severity grading in trauma patients: a simplified technique based upon ICD-9 coding. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care35(4): 497-506; discussion 506-507.
62.
Rutledge R.1995. Injury severity and probability of survival assessment in trauma patients using a predictive hierarchical network model derived from ICD-9 codes. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care38(4): 590-597; discussion 597-601.
63.
Rutledge R, Osler T, Kromhout-Schiro S.1998a. Illness severity adjustment for outcomes analysis: validation of the ICISS methodology in all 821,455 patients hospitalized in North Carolina in 1996. Surgery124(2): 187-194; discussion 194-96.
64.
Rutledge R, Osler T, Emery Set al.1998b. The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): ICISS, an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictors of trauma patient survival, hospital charges, and hospital length of stay. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care44(1): 41-49.
65.
Swiontkowski MF.1996. The multiply injured patient with musculoskeletal injuries. In: Rockwood Cet al. eds. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven,150-151.
66.
Teasdale G, Jennett B.1974. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet2(7872): 81-84.
67.
Tepas JJ 3rd, Ramenofsky ML, Mollitt DLet al.1988. The Pediatric Trauma Score as a predictor of injury severity: an objective assessment. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care28(4): 425-429.
68.
Toh E, Arima T, Mochid AJet al.1998. Functional evaluation using motor scores after cervical spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord36: 491-496.
69.
Turchin DC, Schemitsch EH, McKee MDet al.1999. Do foot injuries significantly affect the functional outcome of multiply injured patients?. J Orthopaed Trauma13(1): 1-4.
70.
Westgren N, Levi R.1998. Quality of life and traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil79(11): 1433-1439.
71.
Williams A.1991. Setting priorities in healthcare: an economists view. J Bone Joint Surg73: 365-367.
