Scaffolding instruction for reading the Web

Abstract

Research has found that text reading and Web reading, while sharing some similarities, require a different balance of strategies. Adult language learners, especially those with limited previous experience with the Web, may therefore need explicit, scaffolded instruction in order to read the Web. This article reports on teacher action research and demonstrates the scaffolded activities teachers developed to help learners read and navigate the Web. First, a linguistic analysis of web pages was conducted. Through this analysis, it was determined that, while there is much published research on web page design, many web pages that could be used in order to support the ESL curriculum do not employ a readable design. The study then followed a collaborative action research model (Burns, 1999) with five teachers across Australia. The study revealed two distinct, but interrelated, reading activities learners need to engage in to use the Web: reading web pages to find their way around a website (that is, reading to navigate) and navigating web pages in order to find and read information to achieve some other language learning goal (that is, navigating to read). The research indicates that learners can read and navigate with fewer problems and less stress for them and their teachers, if instruction includes carefully scaffolded activities that help learners become independent readers and navigators of the Web.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartlett, L. 1990: Teacher development through reflective teaching. In Richards, J. C. and Nunan, D. , editors, Second language teacher education. Cambridge University Press , 202-214.

Bauman, M. L. 1999: The evolution of Internet genres . Computers and Composition 16: 269-282 .

Baynham, M. 1995: Literacy practices. Longman .

Burns, A. 1999. Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge University Press .

Burns, A. 2000: Facilitating collaborative action research: some insights from the AMEP . Prospect 15(3): 23-34 .

Corbel, C. and Gruba, P. 2004: Teaching computer literacy, teaching with new technology. NCELTR .

Crowston, K. and Williams, M. 2000: Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World Wide Web . The Information Society 16(3): 201-216 .

De Ridder, I. 2000: Are we conditioned to follow links? Highlights in CALL materials and their impact on the reading process . Computer Assisted Language Learning 13(2): 183-195 .

De Ridder, I. 2002: Visible or invisible links: does highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension, and the reading process ? Language Learning and Technology 6(1): 123-146 .

10.

De Ridder, I. 2003: Reading from the screen in a second language. Grant Uitgeverij .

11.

Dillon, A. and Gushrowski, B. 2000: Genres and the Web: is the personal home page the first uniquely digital genre ? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(2): 202-205 .

12.

Eyetrack study, 2000: Retrieved 5 May 2004 from <http://www.poynterextra.org/et/i.html>

13.

Feez, S. 1998: Text-based syllabus design. NCELTR .

14.

Freebody, P. and Luke, A. 1990: ‘Literacies programs’: debates and demands in cultural context . Prospect 5(7): 7-16 .

15.

Ganderton, R. 1998: New strategies for a new medium? Observing L2 reading on the World Wide Web . ON-CALL 12(2): 2-9 .

16.

Gibbs, D. 2000: Cyberlanguage: what it is and what it does. In Krause, K. , editor, Cyberlines. James Nicholas , 11-30.

17.

Glister, P. 1997: Digital literacy. John Wiley and Sons .

18.

Grabe, W. and Stoller, F. 2002: Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education .

19.

Hammond, J. and Gibbons, J. 2005: Putting scaffolding to work: the contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education . Prospect 20(1): 6-30 .

20.

Hammond, J. and Gibbons, P. 2001: Scaffolding teaching and learning in language and literacy education. Primary English Teaching Association .

21.

Hargittai, E. 2002: Second-level digital divide: differences in people’s skills . First Monday 7(4): 1-19 . Retrieved 5 May 2004 from <http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/hargittai/index.html>

22.

Hoven, D. in press: Communicating and interacting: an exploration of the changing roles of media . Calico Journal.

23.

Kalyunga, S. 2000: When using sound with a text or picture is not beneficial for learning . Australian Journal of Educational Technology 16(1): 161-172 .

24.

Knobel, M. and Lankshear, C. 2002: Critical cyberliteracies: what young people can teach us about reading and writing the world . Paper presented to National Council of Teachers of English Assembly for Research Mid-Winter Conference, February 2002, New York.

25.

Kress, G. 1997: Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: the potentials of new forms of text. In Snyder, I. , editor, Page to screen: taking literacy into the electronic era. Allen and Unwin , 53-79.

26.

Kumbruck, C. 1998: Hypertext reading: novice vs expert reading . Journal of Research in Reading 21(2): 160-172 .

27.

Lipscomb, P. 2002: Reading what? On the Web. AMEP Research Centre .

28.

Luke, A. and Freebody, P. 1999: Further notes on the four resources model . Reading Online. Retrieved 5 May 2004 from <http://www.readingonline.org>

29.

Maybin, J. , Mercer, N. and Steirer, B. 1992: ‘Scaffolding’ learning in the classroom. In Norman, K. , editor, Thinking voices: the work of the National Curriculum Project. Hodder and Stoughton for the National Curriculum Council , 186-195.

30.

McPherson, P. and Murray, D. E. 2003: Communicating on the Net. NCELTR .

31.

Mercer, N. 1995: The guided construction of knowledge: talk amongst teachers and learners. Multilingual Matters .

32.

Morkes, J. and Nielsen, J. 1998: Concise, scannable and objective: how to write for the Web. Retrieved 5 May 2004 from <http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/writing.html/>

33.

Murray, D. E. and McPherson, P. 2004: Using the Web to support language learning. NCELTR .

34.

New South Wales Adult Migrant English Services 2003: Certificate in Spoken and Written English. NSW AMES .

35.

Nielsen, J. 1997: How users read on the web. Retrieved 5 May 2004 from <http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9710a.html>

36.

Nielsen, J. 1998: Conservatism of Web users. Retrieved 5 May 2004 from <http://www.useit.com/alertbox/980322.html>

37.

Nielsen, J. 1999: When bad design elements become standard. Retrieved 5 May 2004 from <http://www.useit.com/alertbox/991114.html>

38.

Nielsen, J. 2003: Homepage real estate allocation. Retrieved 5 May 2004 from <http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030210.html>

39.

Obendorf, H. and Weinreich, H. 2003: Comparing link marker visualization techniques - changes in reading behaviours . Paper presented to Proceedings of WWW Conference, May 2003, Budapest, Hungary.

40.

Orlikowski, W. J. and Yates, J. 1994: Genre repertoire: the structuring of communicative practices in organizations . Administrative Sciences Quarterly 33: 541-574 .

41.

Snyder, I. 1999: Digital literacies: renegotiating the visual and the verbal in communication . Prospect 14(3): 13-23 .

42.

Snyder, I. 2002: Silicon literacies. Routledge .

43.

Spool, M. , Scanlon, T. , Schroeder, W. , Snyder, C. and DeAngelo, T. 1999: Web site usability: a designer’s guide. Morgan Kaufman .

44.

Sutherland-Smith, W. 2002: Web-text: perceptions of digital reading skills in the ESL classroom . Prospect 17(1): 55-70 .

45.

Thurstun, J. 2000: Screenreading - challenges of the new literacy. In Gibbs, D. and Krause, K. , editors, Cyberlines. James Nicholson , 61-78.

46.

Vygotsky, L. 1978: Mind in society. Harvard University Press .

47.

Walz, J. 2001: Reading hypertext: lower level processes . The Canadian Modern Language Review 57(3): 475-494 .

48.

Warschauer, M. 1999: Electronic literacies: language, culture and power in online education. Lawrence Erlbaum .

49.

Wood, D. , Bruner, J. S. and Ross, G. 1976: The role of tutoring in problem solving . Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17: 89-100 .

50.

Zarcadoolas, C. , Blanco, M. , Boyer, J. F. and Pleasant, A. 2002: Unweaving the Web: an exploratory study of low-level adults’ navigation skills on the World Wide Web . Journal of Health Communication 7: 309-324 .