Exploring the written feedback dialogue: a research,learning and teaching practice

Abstract

The final paper of this Special Issue on Exploratory Practice (EP) is another illustration of the potential of EP for doctoral research. More importantly, like the preceding paper by Gunn it emphasizes learner as well as teacher understanding, and, most importantly, it also explores ‘quality’ in interpersonal relationships.

This paper reports on research, conducted in an EFL Academic Writing context, about a written dialogue between a teacher and her learners. This dialogue consists of the learners’ written text, the teacher’s written feedback and the ongoing responses that ensue from this initial exchange.

Most past research into teachers’ written comments on student-writers’ work has examined quantitatively either the teachers’ or the learners’ perspective, and has emphasized the outcomes of the learners’ revision process. A comprehensive analysis of the intentions and interpretations of the exchange from both the teacher’s and the learners’ perspective, as well as of the dynamic nature of the dialogue within its full pedagogical context, has not yet been done. It was hoped that such an analysis could lead to some generalizations which, in turn, could lead to recommendations for improving pedagogical practice.

However, what began as a quest for a theory that could inspire guidelines for teacher effectiveness became a quest for an understanding of the conditions under which effectiveness could best be achieved. In EP terms, these conditions represent life in the classroom and the quest illustrates the aim of teacher research: to strive toward improving the quality of the life that will enable more effective use of the feedback dialogue as a crucial element in the writing process.

The paper begins by inserting the current research into the context of qualitative research literature, leading directly to EP principles. Reporting on the research itself, it shows how some of the principles were manifested in the research practices. The findings reveal that it is precisely through dialogue (the written exchange as a social enterprise) between the participants in the learning-teaching situation (in a spirit of collegiality), that an understanding of the feedback dialogue can best be reached. Herein lies the promise of an improvement in the quality of life, quality of education and ultimately quality of learning (Allwright, this issue).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allwright, D. 1992: Integrating ‘research’ and ‘pedagogy’: appropriate criteria and practical possibilities. Centre for Research in Language Education, Working Paper Series, Department of Linguistics and Modern English Language, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK .

Anson, C. M. , editor, 1989: Writing and response: theory, practice and research. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English .

Ball, S. J. 1988: Participant observation. In Keeves, J. P. , editor, Educational research, methodology, and measurement: an international handbook, Oxford: Pergamon Press , 507-510.

Briggs, C. L. 1986: Learning how to ask: a sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science. New York: Cambridge University Press .

Burkland, J. and Grimm, N. 1986: Motivating through responding . Journal of Teaching Writing 5: 237-247 .

Charles, M. 1990: Responding to problems in written English using a student self-monitoring technique . ELT Journal 44(4): 286-293 .

Chaudron, C. 1984: The effects of feedback on students’ composition revisions . RELC Journal 15(2): 1-14 .

Cohen, A. D. 1987: Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In Wenden, A. and Rubin, J. , editors, Learner strategies in language learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall , 57-69.

Cohen, A. D. 1996: Verbal reports as a source of insights into second language learner strategies . Applied Language Learning 7(1 & 2): 5-24 .

10.

Cumming, A. 1998: Theoretical perspectives on writing . Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 61-78 .

11.

Devenney, R. 1989: How ESL teachers and peers evaluate and respond to student writing . RELC Journal 20(1): 77-90 .

12.

Donmoyer, R. 1987: Why case studies? Reflections on Hord and Hall’s three images . Curriculum Inquiry 17(1): 91-102 .

13.

Donmoyer, R. 1990: Generalizability and the single-case study. In Eisner, E. W. and Peshkin, A. , editors, Qualitative inquiry in education: the continuing debate, New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University , 201-232.

14.

Ehrman, M. 1996: Understanding second language learning difficulties. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications .

15.

Erickson, F. 1991: Advantages and disadvantages of qualitative research design in foreign language research. In Freed, B. , editor, Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath .

16.

Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. 1980: Verbal reports as data . Psychological Review 87(3): 215-254 .

17.

Ferris, D. R. 1995: Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms . TESOL Quarterly 29(1): 33-53 .

18.

Ferris, D. R. and Roberts, B. 2001: Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10(3): 161-184 .

19.

Freeman, D. , Larsen-Freeman, D. , Handscombe, J. , Allwright, D. and Woods, D. 1991: Understanding Second Language Teaching. Paper presented at symposium at TESOL Conference, New York, April.

20.

Guba, E. G. 1990: Subjectivity and objectivity. In Eisner, E. W. and Peshkin, A. , editors, Qualitative inquiry in education: the continuing debate, New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University , 201-232.

21.

Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. 1981: Effective evaluation: improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .

22.

Harris, M. and Silva, T. 1993: Tutoring ESL students: issues and options . College Composition and Communication 44(4): 525-537 .

23.

Hayes, J. and Flower, L. S. 1983: Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: an introduction to protocol analysis. In Mosenthal, P. , Tamor, L. and Walmsley, S. A. , editors, Research on writing: Principles and methods, New York: Longman , 207-220.

24.

Hedgcock, J. and Lefkowicz, N. 1994: Feedback on feedback: assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing . Journal of Second Language Writing 3: 141-163 .

25.

Hillocks, G. Jr. 1994: Interpreting and counting: objectivity in discourse analysis. In Smagorinski, P. , editor, Speaking about writing, London: Sage Publications , 185-205.

26.

Hyland, F. and Hyland, K. 2001: Sugaring the pill. Praise and criticism in written feedback . Journal of Second Language Writing 10(3): 185-212 .

27.

Ivanic I, R. , Clark, R. and Rimmershaw, R. 2000: What am I supposed to make of this? In Lea, M. R. and Stierer, B. , editors, Student writing in higher education, Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press , 47-65.

28.

Keh, C. L. 1990: Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation . ELT Journal 44(4): 294-304 .

29.

Knapp, D. 1965: A focused, efficient method to relate composition correction to teaching aims. In Allen, H. B. and Campbell, R. N. , editors, Teaching English as a second language: a book of readings, New York: McGraw-Hill , 213-221.

30.

Laurillard, D. 1993: Rethinking university teaching. London: Routledge .

31.

Lincoln, Y. and Guba, E. G. 1985: Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage .

32.

Oxford, R. 1990: Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle .

33.

Postman, N. 1988: Conscientious objections: stirring up trouble about language, technology and education. New York: Alfred A. Knopf .

34.

Ramanathan, V. and Atkinson, D. 1999: Ethnographic approaches and methods in L2 writing research: a critical guide and review . Applied Linguistics 20(1): 44-70 .

35.

Reid, J. 1994: Responding to ESL students’ texts: the myths of appropriation . TESOL Quarterly 28(2): 273-292 .

36.

Schofield, J. W. 1990: Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. In Eisner, E. W. and Peshkin, A. , editors, Qualitative inquiry in education: the continuing debate, New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University , 201-232.

37.

Seliger, H. W. and Shohamy, E. 1989: Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

38.

Smagorinsky, P. 1994: Think-aloud protocol analysis: beyond the black box. In Smagorinsky, P. , editor, Speaking about writing: reflections on research methodology. London: Sage Publications , 3-19.

39.

Stake, R. 1978: The case-study method in social inquiry . Educational Researcher 7: 5-8 .

40.

Straub, R. 1995: Teacher response as conversation: more than casual talk, an exploration . Rhetoric Review 14(2): 374-398 .

41.

Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1990: Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications .

42.

Truscott, J. 1996: The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes . Language Learning 46(2): 327-369 .

43.

van Lier, L. 1994: Forks and hope: pursuing understanding in different ways . Applied Linguistics 15(3): 328-346 .

44.

Wolcott, H. F. 1990: On seeking - and rejecting - validity in qualitative research. In Eisner, E. W. and Peshkin, A. , editors, Qualitative inquiry in education: the continuing debate, New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University , 201-232.

45.

Woods, D. 1996: Teacher cognition in language teaching: beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .