This paper deals with the competing risks model as a special case of a multi-state model. The properties of the model are reviewed and contrasted to the so-called latent failure time approach. The relation between the competing risks model and right-censoring is discussed and regression analysis of the cumulative incidence function briefly reviewed. Two real data examples are presented and a guide to the practitioner is given.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Tsiatis AA.Competing risks . Encyclopedia of Biostatistics1998; 1: 824-834 .
2.
Prentice RL , Kalbfleisch JD , Peterson AV , Flournoy N , Farewell VT , Breslow NE.The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks . Biometrics1978; 34: 541-554 .
3.
Andersen PK , Keiding N.Multi-state models for event history analysis . Statistical Methods in Medical Research2002; 11: 91-115 .
4.
Cox DR.Regression models and life-tables (with discussion) . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B1972; 34: 187-220 .
5.
Chiang CL.Introduction to stochastic processes in biostatistics. New York: Wiley , 1968.
6.
Aalen OO , Johansen S.An empirical transition matrix for non-homogeneous Markov chains based on censored observations . Scandinavian Journal of Statistics1978; 5: 141-150 .
7.
Borgan Ø.Aalen-Johansen estimator . Encyclopedia of Biostatistics1998; 1: 5-10 .
8.
Kaplan EL , Meier P.Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations . Journal of the American Statistical Association1958; 53: 457-481 .
9.
Andersen PK , Borgan Ø , Gill RD , Keiding N.Statistical models based on counting processes. New York: Springer , 1993.
10.
TRACE Study Group . The TRAndolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) study: rationale, design, and baseline charateristics for the screened population . American Journal of Cardiology1994; 73: 44C-50C .
Gail MH.A review and critique and some models used in competing risk analysis . Biometrics1975; 31: 209-222 .
13.
Tsiatis AA.A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in USA1975; 72: 20-22 .
14.
Kalbfleisch JD , Prentice RL.The statistical analysis of failure time data. New York: Wiley , 1980.
15.
Bernoulli D. Essai d’une nouvelle analyse de la mortalité cause é par la petite vérole, et des avantages de l’inoculation pour le prévenir. Histoire avec le Mémoires, Académie Royal des Sciences, Paris, 1-45, 1760.
16.
Gooley TA , Leisenring W , Crowley J , Storer BE.Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators . Statistics in Medicine1999; 18: 695-706 .
17.
Hougaard P.Analysis of multivariate survival data. New York: Springer , 2000.
18.
Andersen PK.Censored data . Encyclopedia of Biostatistics1998; 1: 578-584 .
19.
Cheng SC , Fine JP , Wei LJ.Prediction of the cumulative incidence function under the proportional hazards model . Biometrics1998; 54: 219-228 .
20.
Fine JP , Gray, RJ.A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk . Journal of the American Statistical Association1999; 94: 496-509 .
21.
Fine JP.Regression modeling of competing crude failure probabilities . Biostatistics2001; 2: 85-98 .
22.
Andersen PK , Klein JP , Rosthøj S.From summary statistics to generalized linear models for pseudo-observations; with applications to multi-state models . Submitted to Biometrika.
23.
GrayJR.Aclass of k-sample testsfor comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk . Annals of Statistics1998; 16: 1141-1154 .
24.
Hoel DG , Walburg HE.Statistical analysis of survival experiments . Journal of the National Cancer Institute1972; 49: 361-372 .
