GIS eased into geography without much discord until the 1990s, when a flurry of commentaries about the relative merits of GIS made their way into a number of geographic journals. The ensuing decade was marked by varying degrees of friction between GIS practitioners and their critics in human geography. Despite the methodological chasm between the two groups, little discussion of the implications of these differences has ensued. This article fills that gap with a historiographic examination of critiques of GIS. Critiques of GIS are organized into three waves or periods, each characterized by distinct arguments. The first wave, from 1990 to 1994, was marked by the intensity of debate as well as an emphasis on positivism. By 1995, the conversation waned as the number of critics grew, while GIS practitioners increasingly declined comment. This second wave marked the initiation of a greater degree of co-operation between GIS scholars and their critics, however. With the inception of the National Center for Geographic Information Analysis (NCGIA) Initiative 19, intended to study the social effects of GIS, many critics began to work closely with their peers in GIS. In the third wave, critiques of GIS expressed a greater commitment to the technology. Throughout the decade, debates about the technology shifted from simple attacks on positivism to incorporating more subtle analyses of the effects of the technology. These critiques have had considerable effect on the academic GIS community but are presently constrained by limited communication with GIS practitioners because of the absence of a common vocabulary. I argue that, if critiques of GIS are to be effective, they must find a way to address GIS researchers, using the language and conceptual framework of the discipline.
Barndt, M.1998: GPS public participation GIS–barriers to implementation. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25, 105–112.
2.
Barnes, T.1993: Whatever happened to the philosophy of science?Environment and Planning A25, 301–304.
3.
Bendix, R.1962: Max Weber: an intellectural portrait. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
4.
Billinge, M., Gregory, D. and Martin, R.,editors, 1984: Recollections of a revolution: geography as spatial science. London: Macmillan.
5.
Couclelis, H.1996: Towards an operational typology of geographic entities with ill-defined boundaries. In Burrough, P.A. and Frank, A.U., editors, Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries, London: Taylor & Francis, 45–55.
6.
Craig, W.J.1998: How and why community groups use maps and geographical information systemsCartography and Geographic Information Systems25, 95–104.
7.
Crampton, J.1995: The ethics of GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems22, 84–89.
8.
Curry, M.1995a: Rethinking rights and responsibilities in geographic information systems: beyond the power of the image. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems22, 58–69.
9.
Curry, M.1995b: GIS and the inevitability of ethical inconsistency. In Pickles, J., editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press, 68–87.
10.
Curry, M.1997: The digital individual and the private realm. Annals of the Association of American Geographer87, 681–699.
11.
Curry, M. 1999a: Technological regimes and the evolution of the private. Article presented at the Intersections: Society, Technology, and Geographic Thought workshop on GIS, Rough River Resort, KY29 April–2 May.
12.
Curry, M.1999b: Rethinking privacy in a geocoded world. In Longley, P.A., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D.J., and Rhind, D.W., editors, Geographical information systems: principles, techniques, management and applications, New York: Wiley, 757–766.
13.
Demeritt, D.1996: Social theory and the reconstruction of science and geography. Transactions, Institute of British Geographers21, 484–503.
14.
Dobson, J.1993: Automated geography. Professional Geographer35, 135–143.
15.
Economist, The1997: You can't follow the science wars without a battle map. 13 December, 77–79.
16.
Egenhofer, M.1999: The emperor's new clothes. Article presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Honolulu, HI, 27 March.
17.
Fish, S.1996: Professor Sokal's bad joke. The New York Times 21 May, A23.
18.
Frank, A.U. and Raubal, M.1998: Specifications for interoperability: formalizing image schemata for geographic space. In Poiker, T.K. and Chrisman, N., editors, Proceeding from the 8th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Vancouver, BC: IGU, 331–348.
19.
Goodchild, M.F., 1991: ‘Just the facts’. Politcal Geography Quarterly10, 335–337.
20.
Goodchild, M.F. and Mark, D.M.1993: GIS, geography and the NCGIA. Professional Geographer45, 216–219.
21.
Goss, J.1995: Marketing the new marketing: the strategic discourse of geodemographic information systems. In Pickles, J. editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press, 130–170.
22.
Gray, M.V.1997: Classification as an impediment to the reliable and valid use of spatial information: a disaggregate approach. In Hirtle S.C. and Frank A.U., editors, Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. COSIT ‘97, Berlin: Springer, 137–149.
23.
Gross, P. and Levitt, N.,1994: Higher superstition: the academic left and its quarrel with science. Baltimore, MD, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
Gross, A.G.1996: The rhetoric of science. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Gross, P.R., Levitt, N. and Lewis, M.W.199: The flight from science and reason. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences.
26.
Haraway, D.1991: Simians, cyborgs and women: the reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
27.
Harding, S.1991: Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
Harley, B.1992: Deconstructing the map. In Barnes, T.J. and Duncan, J.S., editors, Writing worlds: discourse, text and metaphor in the representation of landscape, New York and London: Routledge, 231–247.
29.
Harvey, F.1997: From geographic holism to geographic information systems. Professional Geographer49, 77–85.
30.
Harvey, F. 1999: B–ANT–O: Boundary A–NT objects: trails and trail markers. Paper presented at the Intersections: Society, Technology, and Geographic Thought workshop on GIS, Rough River Resort, KY, 29 April–2 May.
31.
Harvey, F. and Chrisman, N.R.1998: Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A30, 1683–1694.
32.
Kitcher, P.1998: A plea for science studies. In Koertge, N., editor, A house built on sand: exposing postmodernist myths about science, New York: Oxford University Press, 32–52.
33.
Koertge, N., editor, 1998: A house built on sand: exposing postmodernist myths about science. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
Kuhn, W. 1994: Defining semantics for spatial data transfers. In Waugh T.C. and Healey R.G., editors, Advances in GIS research: proceedings of the sixth international symposium on spatial data handling, London: Taylor & Francis, 973–987.
35.
Lake, R.W.1993: Planning and applied geography: positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems. Progress in Human Geography17, 404–413.
36.
Latour, B.1987: Science in action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Latour, B.1988: The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Miller, R.P.1995: Beyond method, beyond ethics: integrating social theory into GIS and GIS into social theory. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems22, 98–103.
40.
Monmonier, M.1991: How to lie with maps. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
NCGIA1996: GIS and society: the social implications of how people, space and environment are represented in GIS. Technical Report 96-7. November. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California.
42.
NCGIA1999: The ontology of fields: report of a specialist meeting held under the auspices of the Varenius project. Technical Report 99-7. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California.
43.
Obermeyer, N.1998: The evolution of public participation GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems25, 65–66.
44.
Openshaw, S.1991: A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again. Environment and Planning A23, 621–628.
45.
Openshaw, S.1992: Further thoughts on geography and GIS: a reply. Environment and Planning A24, 463–466.
46.
Openshaw, S.1997: The truth about Ground truth. Transactions in GIS2, 7–24.
47.
Pickering, A.1995: The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL, and London: University of Chicago Press.
48.
Pickles, J.1993: Discourse on method and the history of discipline: reflections on Jerome Dobson's 1993 ‘Automated geography’. Professional Geographer45, 451–455.
49.
Pickles, J.1995a: Representations in an electronic age: geography, GIS, and democracy. In Pickles, J., editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press, 1–30.
50.
Pickles, J.1995b: Conclusion: towards an economy of electronic representation and the virtual sign. In Pickles, J., editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press, 223–240.
51.
Pickles, J. editor, 1995c: Ground truth. New York: Guilford Press.
52.
Pickles, J.1997: Tool or science? GIS, technoscience and the theoretical turn. Annals of the Association of American Geographers87, 363–372.
53.
Pickles, J. 1999a: Intersections: cartography, digital translations, and questions of history. Paper presented at the Intersections: Society, Technology, and Geographic Thought workshop on GIS, Rough River Resort, KY, 29 April–2 May.
54.
Pickles, J.1999b: Arguments, debates and dialogues: the GIS social theory debate and the concern for alternatives. In Longley, P.A., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D.J. and Rhind, D.W., editors, Geographical information systems: principles, techniques, management and applications, New York: Wiley.
55.
Roberts, S.M. and Schein, R.H.1995: Earth shattering: global imagery and GIS. In Pickles, J. editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press, 171–195.
56.
Rorty, R.1989: Contingency, irony and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Rouse, J.1996: Engaging science. How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press.
58.
Rundstrom, R.1995: GIS, indigenous peoples, and epistemological diversity. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems22, 45–57.
59.
Said, E.W.1996: Representations of the intellectual. New York: Vintage Books.
60.
Sheppard, E.1993: Automated geography: what kind of geography for what kind of society?Professional Geographer45, 457–460.
61.
Sheppard, E.1995: Sleeping with the enemy, or keeping the conversation going?Environment and Planning A27, 1026–1028.
62.
Sieber, R.1999: Conforming (to) the opposition: a research agenda for geographic information systems in the conservation movement. Paper presented at the Intersections: Society, Technology, and Geographic Thought workshop on GIS, Rough River Resort, KY, 29 April–2 May.
63.
Smith, B. and Mark, D.M. 1998: Ontology and geographic kinds. In Poiker, T.K. and Chrisman, N., editors, Proceeding from the 8th international symposium on spatial data handling, Vancouver, BC: IGU, 308–20.
64.
Smith, N.1992: History and philosophy of geography: real wars, theory wars. Progess in Human Geography16, 257–271.
65.
Sokal, A.1996a: Transgressing the boundaries: toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity. Social Text46/47, 217–252.
66.
Sokal, A.1996b: A physicist experiments with cultural studies. Lingua Franca6, 62–64.
67.
Sui, D.Z.1994: GIS and urban studies: positivism, post-positivism, and beyond. Urban Geography15, 258–278.
68.
Taylor, P.J.1990: GKS. Political Geography Quarterly9, 211–212
69.
Taylor, P.J. and Johnston, R.1995: GIS and geography. In Pickles, J., editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press, 68–87.
70.
Taylor, P.J. and Overton, M.1991: Further thoughts on geography and GIS. Environment and Planning A23, 1087–1090.
71.
Veregin, H.1995: Computer innovation and adoption in geography: a critique of conventional technological models. In Pickles, J., editor, Ground truth, New York: Guilford Press, 88–112.
72.
Walton, J.1995: How real(ist) can you get?Professional Geographer47, 61–65.
73.
Wright, D.J., Goodchild, M.F. and Proctor, J.1997: Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as ‘tool’ versus ‘science.’Annals of the Association of American Geographers87, 346–362.
