Do hospital palliative care teams improve symptom control? Use of a modified STAS as an evaluation tool

Abstract

The support team assessment schedule (STAS) has previously been validated as an evaluation tool for community palliative care teams and inpatient units. This study reports on use of an expanded STAS (E-STAS) to determine symptom prevalence and outcome for inpatients and outpatients referred to a multiprofessional hospital palliative care team.

E-STAS forms were completed on patients at referral and twice weekly thereafter. Between August 1996 and May 1997, 352 patients had one or more E-STAS forms completed; 122 of this group had three or more assessments. One-hundred-and-eighty-two patients were male and 170 were female, the median age was 68.5 years (range 26–101 years) and all but 27 (8%) had malignant disease. Of the symptoms assessed on referral, the most common were psychological distress 93%, anorexia 73%, pain 59%, mouth discomfort 59%, depression 40%, constipation 36%, breathlessness 32%, nausea 24% and vomiting 13%. In the 122 patients where three or more assessments were completed, statistically significant improvements from first to last assessment were seen in all symptoms except depression.

This study suggests that E-STAS may be a useful tool to evaluate interventions by a hospital palliative care team in patients with advanced disease.

Keywords

palliative care program evaluation hospitals terminal care outcome assessment (health care)neoplasms

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Office of Population Censuses and Surveys . Mortality statistics general. review of the registrar general on deaths in England and Wales, 1992. Series DH1, no. 26. London: HMSO, 1994.

Hockley JM , Dunlop R , Davies RJ . Survey of distressing symptoms in dying patients and their families in hospital and the response to a symptom control team. Br Med J 1988; 296: 1715–1717.

Higginson IJ , McCarthy M . Measuring symptoms in terminal cancer: are pain and dyspnoea controlled? J Roy Soc Med 1989; 82: 264–267.

Simpson KH . The use of research to facilitate the creation of a hospital palliative care team. Palliat Med 1991; 5; 122–129.

McCarthy M , Lay M , Addington-Hall J . Dying from heart disease. J R Coll Phys 1996; 30: 325–328.

McCarthy M , Higginson IJ . Clinical audit by a palliative care team. Palliat Med 1991; 5: 215–221.

Higginson IJ , Wade AM , McCarthy M . Effectiveness of two palliative support teams. J Pub Health Med 1992; 14: 50–59.

Higginson IJ , McCarthy M . A comparison of two measures of quality of life; their sensitivity and validity for patients with advanced cancer. Palliat Med 1994; 8: 282–290.

Higginson IJ , McCarthy M . Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs' ratings reflect those made by patients or their families? Palliat Med 1993; 7: 219–228.

10.

Chamberlain JH , Urch C , Stirling LC , Meyer M , Field GB . Are we successful in controlling symptoms? [Abstract]. Palliat Med 1996; 10: 70.

11.

Bruera E , Kuehn N , Miller MJ , Selsmar P , Macmillan K . The Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care 1991; 7: 6–9.

12.

Ellershaw JE , Peat SJ , Boys LC . Assessing the effectiveness of a hospital palliative care team. Palliat Med 1995; 9: 145–152.

13.

McIllmurray MB , Warren MR . Evaluation of a new hospice: the relief of symptoms in cancer patients in the first year. Palliat Med 1989; 3: 135–140.

14.

Higginson IJ . Audit methods: validation and inpatient use. In: Higginson IJ ed. Clinical audit in palliative care. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical, 1993: 48–54.

15.

McKee E . Audit experience: a nurse manager in home care. In: Higginson IJ ed. Clinical audit in palliative care. Oxford, Radcliffe Medical, 1993: 128–137.

16.

Field GB , Chamberlain JH , Urch C et al. Evaluation of the support team assessment schedule for the inpatient setting–and its further development. In: De Conno F ed. Proceedings IV Congress of European Association of Palliative Care, 6–9 December 1995. Milan: EAPC, 1997: 99–108.

17.

Rothman ML , Hedrick SC , Bulcroft KA , Hickam DH , Rubenstein LZ . The validity of proxy-generated scores as a measure of patient health status. Med Care 1991; 29: 115–124.

18.

Sprangers MA , Aaronson NK . The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating quality of life in patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 743–760.

19.

Epstein AM , Hall JA , Tognetti J , Son LH , Conant LJ . Using proxies to evaluate quality of life: can they provide valid information about patients' health status and satisfaction with medical care? Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation Second Conference on Advances in Health Status Assessment. Med Care 1988; 27: S91–S98.