A validation study of a pain classification system for advanced cancer patients using content experts: the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to gather construct validity evidence for a pain classification system for advanced cancer patients using content experts. Two expert panels, representing regional (Panel A, n / 18) and national/international (Panel B, n / 52) palliative medicine and pain specialists, were purposefully selected to participate in a modified Delphi survey technique, to evaluate an existing pain classification system, the Revised Edmonton Staging System (rESS). Each panel participated in two survey rounds, with response rates of 67% (Panel A, Round 1), 39% (Panel A, Round 2), 56% (Panel B, Round 1) and 64% (Panel B, Round 2). The rESS consists of five features: mechanism of pain, incidental pain, psychological distress, addictive behavior and cognitive function. Most participants either agreed or strongly agreed with including the five existing rESS features in a pain classification system, ranging from 67% (Panel A, cognitive function) to 100% (Panel B, mechanism of pain). Most participants suggested keeping the current definitions for these features, with some revisions. Based on participant feedback, definitions for incidental pain, psychological distress, addictive behavior and cognitive function were revised, including the development of guidelines for use. To reflect its intended use as a classification system, the name of the instrument was changed to the Edmonton Classification System for Cancer Pain (ECS-CP).

Keywords

cancer pain construct validity Delphi technique pain assessment pain classification validation study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Portenoy RK , Lesage P . Management of cancer pain . Lancet 1999; 353: 1695–1700 .

Ventafridda V , Tamburini M , Caraceni A , DeConno F , Naldi F . A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief . Cancer 1987; 59: 850–856 .

Zech DF , Grond S , Lynch J , Hertel D , Lehmann KA . Validation of World Health Organization guidelines for cancer pain relief: a 10-year retrospective study . Pain 1995; 63: 65–76 .

Bruera E , MacMillan K , Hanson J , MacDonald RN . The Edmonton Staging System for cancer pain: preliminary report . Pain 1989; 37: 203–209 .

Bruera E , Schoeller T , Wenk R , et al. A prospective multicenter assessment of the Edmonton Staging System for cancer pain . J Pain Symptom Manage 1995; 10: 348–355 .

Obiols M , Lossignol D . A staging system for cancer pain . Support Care Cancer 1995; 5: 357–357 . (abstract).

Fainsinger RL , Nekolaichuk CL , Lawlor PG , Neumann CM , Hanson J , Vigano A . A multicenter study of the Revised Edmonton Staging System for classifying cancer pain in advanced cancer patients . J Pain Symptom Manage 2005; 29: 224–237 .

Dalkey NC . The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinions. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp , 1969.

Linstone HA . The Delphi technique. In Fowles J ed. Handbook of futures research. Westport: Greenwood , 1978: 273–300.

10.

Uhl NP . Using the Delphi technique in institutional planning. In Uhl NP ed. Using research for strategic planning. New directions for institutional research, no. 37. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass , 1983: 81–94.

11.

Boberg AL , Morris-Khoo, SA . The Delphi method: a review of methodology and an application in the evaluation of a higher education program . Can J Prog Evaluat 1992; 7: 27–39 .

12.

Patton MQ . Qualitative research and evaluation methods, third edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 2002.

13.

Armstrong D , Marshall JK , Chiba N , et al. Canadian consensus conference on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults – update 2004 . Can J Gastroenterol 2005; 19: 15–35 .

14.

American Academy of Pain Medicine, American Pain Society and American Society of Addiction Medicine. Definitions related to the use of opioids for the treatment of pain. Retrieved August 3, 2004 from http://www.painmed.org/productpub/statements/index.html, 2001.

15.

Mercadante S . What is the definition of breakthrough pain? Pain 1991; 45: 107–108 . (comment).

16.

Caraceni A , Martini C , Zecca E , Portenoy RK . Working Group of an IASP Task Force on Cancer Pain. Breakthrough pain characteristics and syndromes in patients with cancer pain. An international survey . Palliat Med 2004; 18: 177–183 .

17.

Mercadante S , Radbruch L , Caraceni A , et al. Episodic (breakthrough) pain: consensus conference of an expert working group of the European Association for Palliative Care . Cancer 2002; 94: 832–839 .

18.

Portenoy RK , Hagen NA . Breakthrough pain: definition, prevalence and characteristics . Pain 1991; 41: 273–281 .

19.

Hjermstad MJ . Methods of assessment of cognitive failure and delirium in palliative care patients: implications for practice and research . Palliat Med 2004; 18: 494–506 .