It has become commonplace to say that contemporary western society is ’deathdenying‘. This characterization, which sociologists have termed the ’denial of death thesis‘, first arose in the social science, psychological and clinical medical literature in the period between 1955 and 1985. During the same time period, the hospice and palliative care movements were developing and in part directed themselves against the perceived cultural denial of death in western society. While the denial of death has been taken for granted by the lay public as well as by clinicians, in the sociological literature it has been increasingly questioned. In this paper we use sociological critiques of the denial of death thesis to raise critical questions about the theory and practice of contemporary palliative care. In particular, we argue that the emphasis of palliative care should not be on extinguishing the denial of death but on the relief of suffering. Palliative Medicine 2004; 18: 121-128
Kellehear A. Are we a death-denying society? A sociological review. Soc Sci Med1984; 18: 713-723.
2.
Seale C. Constructing death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
3.
Lo‘and L. The craft of dying: the modern face of death. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1978.
4.
Connor S. Hospice: practice, pitfalls and promise. Vermont: Taylor and Francis, 1998: 4-4.
5.
Doyle D, Hanks G, MacDonald N. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
6.
Rando T. Grief, dying and death: clinical interventions for caregivers. Champaign, IL: Research Press, 1984.
7.
Hudson RP. Death, dying and the zealous phase. Ann Intern Med1978; 88: 696-702.
8.
Scott JF. More money for palliative care? The economics of denial. J Palliat Care1994; 10: 35-38.
9.
Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. The promise of a good death. Lancet1998; 351 (suppl II): 21-29.
10.
Walter T. Modern death: taboo or not taboo?Sociology1991; 25: 293-310.
11.
Dumont R, Foss D. The American view of death: acceptance or denial?Cambridge: Schenkman, 1972.
12.
Gorer G. Death, grief and mourning. London: Cresset, 1965.
13.
Aries P. Western attitudes toward death: from the Middle Ages to the present. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974.
14.
Feifel H. The meaning of death. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.
15.
Strack S. Preface. In Strack S ed. Death and the quest for meaning. New Jersey: Jason Aronson, 1997: xi-xiii.
16.
Kubler-Ross E. On death and dying. New York: Macmillan, 1969.
17.
Glaser BG, Strauss A. Awareness of dying. Chicago: Aldine, 1965.
18.
Hinton J. The physical and mental distress of the dying. Q J Med1963; 32: 1-21.
19.
Corr CA. Death in modern society. In Doyle D, Hanks G, MacDonald N eds. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999: 31-40.
20.
Cohen LM, McHue JD, Germain M, Woods A, Lic SW. Denying the dying: advance directives and dialysis discontinuation. Psychosomatics1997; 38: 27-34.
21.
Walter T. The revival of death. London: Routledge, 1994.
22.
Armstrong D. Silence and truth in death and dying. Soc Sci Med1987; 24: 651-657.
23.
Fuchs VR. The growing demand for medical care. N Engl J Med1968; 279: 192-192.
24.
Barger-Lux MJ, Heaney RP. For better and worse: the technological imperative in health care. Soc Sci Med1986; 22: 1313-1320.
25.
Cassell EJ. Dying in a technological society. Hastings Centre Studies1974; 2: 31-36.
26.
Saunders C. The moment of truth: care of the dying person. In Pearson L ed. Death and dying: current issues in the treatment of the dying person. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University Press, 1969: 49-78.
27.
McHue J. The naturalness of dying. JAMA1995; 273: 1039-1043.
28.
Callahan D. Death and the research imperative. N Engl J Med2000; 342: 654-656.
29.
Illich I. Limits to medicine. Medical nemesis: the expropriation of health. London: Penguin Books, 1976.
30.
Clark D. Cicely Saunders: founder of the hospice movement. Selected letters 1959-1999. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
31.
Parsons T, Lidz V. Death in American society. In Shneidman E ed. Essays in self-destruction. New York: Science House, 1967: 133-170.
32.
Bayer R, Callahan D, Fletcher J, et al. The care of the terminally ill: morality and economics. N Engl J Med1983; 309: 490-494.
33.
Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. The economics of dying: the illusion of cost savings at the end of life. N Engl J Med1994; 330: 540-544.
34.
Fainsinger RL, Bruera E. When to treat dehydration in the terminally ill patient?Support Care Cancer1997; 5: 205-211.
35.
Lawlor P. Delirium and dehydration: some food for thought?Support Care Cancer2002; 10: 445-454.
36.
Friel PB. Death and dying. Ann Intern Med1982; 97: 767-771.
37.
Thorpe G. Enabling more people to die at home. BMJ1993; 307: 915-918.
38.
Blauner R. Death and social structure. Psychiatry1966; 29: 394-394.
39.
Elias N. The civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
40.
Elias N. The loneliness of the dying. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.
41.
Carstairs S, Beaudoin GA. Quality end-of life care: the right of every Canadian. 2000. Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology.
42.
Vachon M. The stress of professional caregivers. In Doyle D, Hanks GWC, MacDonald N eds. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999: 919-929.
43.
World Health Organization. WHO de” nition of palliative care. www.who.int/cancer/palliative/de” nition/en (accessed 17 September 2003).
44.
Nelson JE, Danis M. End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: where are we now?Crit Care Med2001; 29 (2 Suppl): N2-N9.
45.
Llamas KJ, Pickhaver AM, Piller NB. Mainstreaming palliative care for cancer patients in the acute hospital setting. Palliat Med2001; 15: 207-212.
46.
Glare PA, Auret AA, Aggarwal G, Clark KJ, Pinstock SE, Lickiss JN. The interface between palliative medicine and specialisits in acute-care hospitals: boundaries, bridges and challenges. Med J Austr2003; 179 (Suppl): S29-S31.
