This article explores some effects of first language verb-argument structure on
second language processing of English as a second language. Speakers of Chinese,
Japanese or Korean, three Romance languages and native English speakers provided
word-by-word reading times and grammaticality judgement data in a self-paced reading
task. Results suggest that reliable differences in parsing are not restricted to
cases where verb-argument structure differs crosslinguistically.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abacus Concepts1989: SuperANOVA.
Berkeley, CA: Abacus Concepts, Inc.
2.
Adjémian, C.1983: The transfer of lexical properties. In
Gass, S.
and
Selinker, L.
, editors, Language transfer in language learning.
Rowley, MA: Newbury House
, 250–268.
3.
Baker, M.C.1988: Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function
changing.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
4.
Bowerman, M.1990:
Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: are children helped by
innate ‘linking rules’?Linguistics, 28,
1253–1289
.
5.
Chomsky, N.1981: Lectures on Government and Binding.
Dordrecht: Foris
.
6.
Chomsky, N.1986: Knowledge of language.
New York: Praeger
.
7.
Ferreira, F.
and
Henderson, J.M.1990:
The use of verb information in syntactic parsing: a comparison of evidence
from eye movements and word by word self-paced reading
. Journal of Experimental Psychology16,
555–568
.
8.
Fodor, J.D.1978:
Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations
. Linguistic Inquiry9,
427–474
.
9.
Gorrell, P.1995: Syntax and parsing.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
10.
Haspelmath, M.1993: More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb
alternations. In
Comrie, B.
and
Polinsky, M.
, editors, Causatives and transitivity.
Amsterdam: Benjamins
, 87–120.
11.
Hawkins, J.A.1990:
A parsing theory of word order universals
. Linguistic Inquiry21,
223–262
.
12.
Holmes, V.M.
,
Stowe, L.
and
Cupples, L.1989:
Lexical expectations in parsing verb complement sentences
. Journal of Memory and Language28,
668–689
.
13.
Inoue, A.
and
Fodor, J.D.1995: Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In
Mazuka, R.
and
Nagai, N.
editors, Japanese sentence processing.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, 9–64.
14.
Jacobsen, W.1992: The transitive structure of events in Japanese.
Tokyo: Kurosio
.
15.
Juffs, A.1996: Learnability and the lexicon: theories and second language
acquisition research.
Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins
.
16.
Juffs, A.1998a:
Main verb vs reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second
language sentence processing
. Language Learning48,
107–147
.
17.
Juffs, A.1998b:Subject–object asymmetries in second language
processing of wh-extraction.
Ms, University of Pittsburgh
.
18.
Juffs, A.
and
Harrington, M.1995:
Parsing effects in L2 sentence processing: subject and object asymmetries inwh-extraction
. Studies in Second Language Acquisition17,
483–516
.
19.
Juffs, A.
and
Harrington, M.1996:
Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing research
. Language Learning46,
286–324
.
20.
Just, M.A.
,
Carpenter, P.A.
and
Woolley, J.D.1982:
Paradigms and processes and in reading comprehension
. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General3,
228–238
.
21.
Levin, B.1993: English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary
investigation.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
22.
MacDonald, M.C.1994:
Probablistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution
. Language and Cognitive Processes9,
157–201
.
23.
Pinker, S.1989: Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument
structure.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
24.
Pritchett, B.L.1992: Grammatical competence and parsing performance.
Chicago: Chicago University Press
.
25.
Schachter, J.
and
Yip, V.1990:
Grammaticality judgements: why does anyone object to subject extractions?Studies in Second Language Acquisition12,
379–392
.
26.
Schneider, W.1990: MicroExperimental Laboratory, Version 2.
Pittsburgh, PA: Software Tools, Inc.
27.
Talmy, L.1985: Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical
patterns. In
Shopen, T.
, editor, Language typology and syntactic description.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
, 57–149.
28.
Tanenhaus, M.K.
,
Carlson, G.
and
Trueswell, J.C.1989:
The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing
. Language and cognitive processes4,
211–234
.
29.
Trueswell, J.C.
,
Tanenhaus, M.
and
Garnsey, S.1994:
Semantic influences on parsing: use of thematic role information in
syntactic ambiguity resolution
. Journal of Memory and Language33,
285–318
.
30.
White, L.
and
Juffs, A.1998:Constraints on Wh-movement in two different contexts of
non-native language acquisition: competence and processing. In
Flynn, S.
,
Martohardjono, G.
and
O'Neill, W.
, editors, The generative study of second language acquisitionHillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
, 111–130.
