Markedness,operator movement and discourse effects in the acquisition of purpose clause constructions in a second language

Abstract

This article appraises the effects of gap position and discourse information in the acquisition of purpose clause constructions (PCs) by adult Francophones learning English as L2. L1 acquisition studies reveal children having little difficulty interpreting a PC with a subject gap only (SPC) while a PC with an object gap (OPC) has been problematic to interpret. This may be the result of the number of syntactic operations–including operator movement–involved in its derivation plus lexically specified restrictions on the matrix verb. There are grounds for hypothesizing a late emergence of OPCs in English for French speakers. They are not allowed in French and, in addition to lexical restrictions associated with the choice of matrix verb, are marked semantically and typologically; an OPC with a prepositional object gap is additionally syntactically marked. This may thus result in the late acquisition of OPCs relative to SPCs. An additional hypothesis addresses whether L2 learners are adept at using discourse clues to interpret syntactic structure.

Results indicate initial difficulty interpreting only PCs with prepositional object gaps, providing support for the hypothesis that syntactically (structurally) marked constructions may create initial learning difficulty in L2 acquisition.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altmann, G. 1988: Ambiguity parsing strategies and computational models . Language and Cognitive Processes 3, 73–97 .

Bach, E. 1982: Purpose clauses and control. In Jacobson, P. and Pullum, G. , editors, The nature of syntactic representation, Dordrecht: Reidel .

Browning, M. 1987: Null operator constructions. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Chierchia, G. 1989: Structured meanings, thematic roles and control. In Chierchia, G. , Partee, B. and Turner, R. , editors, Properties, types and meaning II, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic .

Chomsky, N. 1981: Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris .

Chomsky, N. 1986: Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

Felix, S. 1988: UG generated knowledge in adult second language acquisition. In Flynn, S. and O’Neil, W. , editors, Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic .

Forster, K. 1979: Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In Cooper, W. and Walker, E. , editors, Sentence-processing, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .

Goodluck, H. 1990: Knowledge integration in processing and acquisition. In Frazier, L. and De Villiers, J. , editors, Language processing and language acquisition, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic .

10.

Goodluck, H. , Finney, M. and Sedivy, J. 1992: Completeness and filler gap dependency parsing. In OTS yearbook, Utrecht: Research Institute for Language and Speech, University of Utrecht .

11.

Hornstein, N. and Weinberg, A. 1981: Case theory and preposition stranding . Linguistic Inquiry 12, 55–91 .

12.

Kayne, R. 1981: On certain differences between French and English . Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349–371 .

13.

Liceras, J. 1989: On some properties of the ‘pro-drop’ parameter: looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish. In Gass, S. and Schachter, J. , editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

14.

Phinney, M. 1987: The pro-drop parameter in second language acquisition. In Roeper, T. and Williams, E. , editors, Parameter setting, Dordrecht: Reidel .

15.

Stevenson, R. and Pickering, M. 1987: The effects of linguistic and nonlinguistic knowledge on the acquisition of pronouns. In Griffiths, P. , Local, J. and Mills, A. , editors, Proceedings of the child language seminar, York: York University .

16.

Taraban, R. and McClelland, J. 1988: Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: influence of content-based expectations . Journal of Memory and Language 27, 597–632 .

17.

Tellier, C. 1991: Licensing theory and French parasitic gaps. Dordrecht: Kluwer Acadamic .

18.

Van Riemsdijk, H. 1978: A case study of syntactic markedness–the binding nature of prepositional phrases. Dordrecht: Foris .

19.

White, L. 1983: Markedness and parameter setting: some implications for a theory of adult second language acquisition. In Eckman, F. , Moravcsik, E. and Wirth, J. , editors, Markedness, Plenum Press .

20.

White, L. 1986: Implications of parametric variation for adult second language acquisition: an investigation of the ‘pro-drop’ parameter. In Cook, V. , editor, Experimental approaches to second language acquisition, New York and London: Pergamon Press .

21.

White, L. 1988: Island effects in second language acquisition. In Flynn, S. and O’Neil, W. , editors, Linguistic theory in second language acquisition, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic .

22.

White, L. 1991: Second language competence vs second language performance. In Eubank, L. , editor, Point counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins .