This paper presents advice on the planning and presentation of cephalometric investigations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaumrindS. and FrantzR. (1971a) The reliability of head film measurements. Part 1. Landmark identification, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 111–127.
2.
BaumrindS. and FrantzR. (1971b) The reliability of head film measurements. Part 2. Conventional angular and linear measurements, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, 505–517.
3.
BooksteinF. (1982) On the cephalometrics of skeletal change, American Journal of Orthodontics, 112, 177–198.
4.
BuschangP. H., TanguayR. and DemirjianA. (1987) Cephalometric reliability. A full ANOVA model for the estimation of true and error variance, The Angle Orthodontist, 57, 168–175.
5.
CheverudJ. L., BachrachW. and LewW. D. (1983) The measurement of form and variation in form: an application of three dimensional quantitative morphology by finite element methods, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 62, 151–163.
6.
DrageK. J., and HuntN. P. (1990) Overjet relapse following functional appliance therapy, British Journal of Orthodontics, 17, 205–213.
7.
GardnerM. J. and AltmanD. G. (1989) Statistics with Confidence, British Medical Journal, London.
8.
GoreS. M. and AltmanD. G. (1982) Statistics in Practice, British Medical Journal, London.
9.
GravelyJ. F. and BenziesP. M. (1974) The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry, British Journal of Orthodontics, 1, 95–101.
10.
HoustonW. J. B. (1983) The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements, American Journal of Orthodontics, 83, 382–390.
11.
HoustonW. J. B., MaherR. E. and SherriffM. (1986) Sources of error in measurements from cephalometric radiographs, European Journal of Orthodontics, 8, 149–151.
12.
LestrelP. E. (1989) Some approaches towards the mathematical modelling of the crainiofacial complex, Journal of Crainiofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology, 9, 77–91.
13.
MoyersR. E. and BooksteinF. (1979) The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics, American Journal of Orthodontics, 75, 599–617.
14.
ToorJ. S. (1986) Comparison of post-operative dental and skeletal changes following sagittal split and subsigmoid osteotomies in Class III malocclusions, M.Sc. (Med. Sci.) dissertation, University of Glasgow.