Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Keywords

editorial policies open science peer review research science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

MCB

Clauw

. 2025. Open data sharing: what could possibly go wrong? Pain. 166(11):2487–2489. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003696

Donaldson

Koepke

. 2022. A focus groups study on data sharing and research data management. Sci Data. 9(1):345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01428-w

Gabelica

BojČiĆ

Puljak

2022. Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: a mixed-methods study. J Clin Epidemiol. 150:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.019

Grant

, et al. 2025. TOP 2025: an update to the transparency and openness promotion guidelines [preprint]. MetaArXiv.Nmfs6_v2. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/nmfs6_v2

Hahnel

Smith

Campbell

2024. The state of open data 2024: special report bridging policy and practice in data sharing. Digital Science. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27337476.v2

Lamb

Russell

Morant

Stevenson

2024. The challenges of open data sharing for qualitative researchers. J Health Psychol. 29(7):659–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241237620

Macleod

. 2022. Improving the reproducibility and integrity of research: what can different stakeholders contribute? BMC Res Notes. 15(1):146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06030-2

National Institutes of Health. 2023 Jan 25. Final NIH policy for data management and sharing. NIH Office of the Director; [accessed 2025 Nov 14]. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-21-013.html

Prosser

AMB

, et al. 2023. When open data closes the door: a critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals. Br J Soc Psychol. 62(4):1635–1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12576

10.

Sheffield

Leroy

Khoroshevskyi

2023. Challenges to sharing sample metadata in computational genomics. Front Genet. 14:1154198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1154198

11.

Spick

, et al. 2025. Quantifying new threats to health and biomedical literature integrity from rapidly scaled publications and problematic research [preprint]. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.07.25331008

12.

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

2007. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 19(6):349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

13.

Towse

Ellis

Towse

. 2021. Making data meaningful: guidelines for good quality open data. J Soc Psychol. 161(4):395–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1938811

14.

Uribe

Sofi-Mahmudi

Raittio

Maldupa

Vilne

2022. Dental research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles. J Dent Res. 101(11):1307–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221101321