Abstract
With the increased interest in measuring the need for orthodontic treatment and the quality of the outcome of orthodontic care, the difficulties in using Grainger's Treatment Priority Index (TPI) to screen children in their tenth year is considered. The first part of the study investigated the level of validity of the TPI using 137 study models and three orthodontists. In the light of the results obtained, the TPI was modified. The clinical judgement of a further two orthodontists was compared with the scores obtained from the modified TPI, using another 121 study models. Three Community Dental Officers were employed initially to assess the training needs for personnel who were not trained in orthodontics. A further five Community Dental Officers were involved in the final training programmes. It was concluded that it will be very difficult to produce an index which considers all aspects of malocclusion and which can be used consistently by personnel untrained in orthodontics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.