In those cases judged to be suitable for treatment by extractions in both arches and the use of upper removable appliances alone, the closure of excess residual space relies on mesial drift of the buccal segments. If opposing residual spaces are unequal in extent, there is a risk that space closure will be incomplete. Two cases are presented where a removable appliance was used to move a buccal segment mesially using a traction screw, and thereby close the excess residual space.
ChapmanH. (1931) Abnormalities of position: Treatment. In: BennettN. (ed.), 573–618, The Science and Practice of Dental Surgery, Waverley Book Company, London.
2.
GraberT. M. and NeumannM. D. (1984) Removable orthodontic appliances, 2nd edn, W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia.
3.
RobinP. (1902) Observation sur un Nouvel Appareil de Redressement. Revue de Stomatologie, 9, 423–432.
4.
StephensC. D. and LloydT. G. (1980) Changes in molar occlusion after extraction of all first premolars: a follow-up study of Class II Division 1 cases treated with removable appliances, British Journal of Orthodontics, 7, 139–144.
