This paper deals with the problem of the controlled closure of excess space in either one or both arches after labial segment alignment or overjet reduction has been achieved. The situations that give rise to the problem are listed. The importance of the need for controlled tooth movement, in order to maintain the antero-posterior labial segment position during space closure, is discussed. A detailed account, with illustrations, of the mechanics involved when using an edgewise system is presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsL. F. (1972) The six keys to normal occlusion, American Journal of Orthodontics, 62, 296–309.
2.
HixonE. H., AtikianH., CallowG. E., McDonaldH. W. and TacyR. J. (1969) Optimal force, differential force, and anchorage, American Journal of Orthodontics, 55, 437–457.
3.
HixonE. H., AasenT. O., ArangoJ., ClarkR. A., KlostermanR., MillerS. S. and OdomW. M. (1970) On force and tooth movement, American Journal of Orthodontics, 57, 476–489.
4.
HoldawayR. A. (1983) A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I, American Journal of Orthodontics, 84, 1–28.
5.
LowF. D. and HunterW. S. (1982) Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction, American Journal of Orthodontics, 82, 384–391.
6.
MillsJ. R. E. (1967) A long-term assessment of the mechanical retroclination of lower incisors, The Angle Orthodontist, 37, 163–174.
7.
MillsJ. R. E. (1968) The stability of the lower labial segment, Dental Practitioner, 18, 293–305.
8.
SchudyF. F. and SchudyG. F. (1975) The Bimetric system, American Journal of Orthodontics, 67, 57–91.
9.
StonerM. M. (1969) Tooth movement and Force systems, in GraberT. M. (Ed.), Current orthodontic concepts and techniques Vol. 1, Philadelphia: Saunders.