In this study, solid Scots pine was surface densified in an open press using different moisture contents (9·6 and 12·4%), temperatures (150 and 200°C), press closing times (0·5 and 5 min), holding times (1 and 10 min) and compression ratios (6·7 and 25%). The characteristics of the formed density profiles were defined and their correlations to the process parameters and Brinell hardness and elastic recovery were analysed. Compression ratio and closing time had the strongest effect on the formation of the density profile, as well as the hardness and elastic recovery. The amount of localised deformation (peak area) did not have significant effect on the Brinell hardness or elastic recovery, whereas, the highest density achieved (peak density) and its location (peak distance) dominated the effect. Brinell hardness and elastic recovery were found to correlate well with each other.
EN 1534. Wood and parquet flooring – determination of resistance to indentation (Brinell) – test method. CEN – European Committee for Standardation, Brussels.
2.
FangC-H, MariottiN, CloutierA, KoubaaA, BlanchetP. 2011. Densification of wood veneers by compression combined with heat and steam.Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 70: 155–163.
3.
GongM, LamasonC, LiL. 2010. Interactive effect of surface densification and post-heat-treatment on aspen wood.J. Mater. Process. Technol. 210: 293–296.
4.
HeräjärviH. 2004. Variation of basic density and Brinell hardness within mature Finnish Betula pendula and B.pubescen stems. Wood Fib. Sci. 36: 216–227.
InoueM, NorimotoM, TanahashiM, RowellRM. 1993. Steam or heat fixation of compressed wood.Wood Fib. Sci. 25(3): 224–235.
7.
IrvineGM. 1984. The glass transition of lignin and hemicelluloses and their measurement by differential thermal analysis.Tappi.67: 118–121.
8.
KelleySS, RialsTG, GlasserWG. 1987. Relaxation behaviour of the amorphous components of wood.J. Mater. Sci. 22: 617–624.
9.
KutnarA, KamkeFA, SernekM. 2009. Density profile and morphology of viscoelastic thermal compressed wood.Wood Sci. Technol. 43: 57–68
10.
KutnarA, RautkariL, LaineK, HughesM. 2012. Thermodynamic characteristics of surface densified solid Scots pine wood.Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod., 70(5): 727–734.
11.
LamasonC, GongM. 2007. Optimization of pressing parameters for mechanically surface densified aspen.For. Prod. J. 57(10): 64–68.
12.
LaineK, RautkariL, HughesM. 2012. Brinell hardness of surface densified Scots pine – the effect of process parameters, Proc. 6th Eur. Conf. of Wood Modification. Ljubljana, Slovenia, 17–18 Sep 2012.
13.
LaineK, RautkariR, HughesM. 2013a. The effect of process parameters on the hardness of surface densified Scots pine solid wood. Eur.J. Wood Wood Prod. 71(1): 13–16.
14.
LaineK, RautkariL, HughesM, KutnarA. 2013b. Reducing the set-recovery of surface densified solid Scots pine wood by hydrothermal post-treatment.Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 71(1): 17–23.
15.
OlssonA-M, SalménL. 1997. The effect of lignin composition on the viscoelastic properties of wood.Nord. Pulp Paper Res. J. 12: 140–143.
16.
RautkariL, KamkeF, HughesM. 2011a. Density profile relation to hardness of viscoelastic thermal compressed (VTC) wood composite.Wood Sci. Technol. 45: 693–705.
17.
RautkariL, LaineK, LaflinN, HughesM. 2011b. Surface modification of Scots pine: the effect of process parameters on the through thickness density profile.J. Mater. Sci. 46: 4780–4786.
18.
RautkariL, HänninenT, JohanssonL.-S, HughesM. 2012. A study by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of the chemistry of the surface of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) modified by friction.Holzforschung.66: 93–96.
19.
RautkariL, LaineK, KutnarA, MedvedS, HughesM. 2013. Hardness and density profile of surface densified and thermally modified Scots pine in relation to degree of densification.J. Mater. Sci. 48: 2370–2375.
20.
RautkariL, ProperziM, PichelinF, HughesM. 2009. Surface modification of wood using friction.Wood Sci. Technol. 43: 291–299.
21.
RautkariL, ProperziM, PichelinF, HughesM. 2010. Properties and set-recovery of surface densified Norway spruce and European beech.Wood Sci. Technol. 44: 679–691.
22.
SalménNL. 1982. Temperature and water induced softening behaviour of wood fibre based materials, PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
23.
SuleimanBM, LarfeldtJ, LecknerB, GustavssonM. 1999. Thermal conductivity and diffusivity of wood.Wood Sci. Technol. 33: 465–473.
24.
UnsalO, CandanZ. 2008. Moisture content, vertical density profile and Janka hardness of thermally compressed Pine wood panels as a function of press pressure and temperature.Drying Technol.26: 1165–1169.
25.
WangaardFF. 1940. Transverse heat conductivity of wood.Heating, Pip. Air Cond. Jul1940: 459–464.
26.
WongED, ZhangM, WangQ, KawaiS. 1998. Effects of mat moisture content and press closing speed on the formation of density profile and properties of particleboard.J. Wood Sci. 44: 287–295.
27.
WongED, ZhangM, WangQ, KawaiS. 1999. Formation of the density profile and its effect on the properties of particleboard.Wood Sci. Technol. 33: 327–340.
28.
WongED, ZhangM, WangQ, HanG, KawaiS. 2000. Formation of the density profile and its effect on the properties of fiberboard.J. Wood Sci. 46: 202–209.
29.
YapiciF, OzcifciA, EsenR, KurtS. 2011. The effect of grain angle and species on thermal conductivity of some selected wood species.Bioresources.6(3): 2757–2762.
