DattaS. and ChattopadhyayP. P.: ‘Soft computing techniques in advancement of structural metals’, Int. Mater. Rev., DOI 10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000021.
2.
PaszkowiczW.: ‘Genetic algorithms, a nature-inspired tool: a survey of applications in materials science and related fields: part II’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 708–725.
3.
ChakrabortiN.: ‘Genetic algorithms in materials design and processing’, Int. Mater. Rev., 2004, 49, 246–260.
4.
MitraK.: ‘Genetic algorithms in polymeric material production, design, processing and other applications: a review’, Int. Mater. Rev., 2008, 53, 275–297.
5.
SharmaT. K., PantM. and SinghM.: ‘Nature-inspired metaheuristic techniques as powerful optimizers in the paper industry’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 788–802.
6.
ChakrabortiN., KumarB. S., BabuV. S., MoitraS. and MukhopadhyayA.: ‘Optimizing surface profiles during hot rolling: a genetic algorithms based multi-objective optimization’, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2006, 37, 159–165.
7.
KlancnikS., BrezocnikM., BalicJ. and KarabegovicI.: ‘Programming of CNC milling machines using particle swarm optimization’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 811–815.
8.
ChakrabortiN., ShekharA., SinghalA., ChowdhuryS. and SripriyaR.: ‘Fluid flow in hydrocyclones optimized through multi-objective genetic algorithms’, Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng., 2008, 16, 1023–1046
9.
GangulyS., KongC. S., BroderickS. R. and RajanK.: ‘Informatics-based uncertainty quantification in the design of inorganic scintillators’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 726–732
10.
JainA., CastelliI. E., HautierG., BaileyD. H. and JacobsenK. W.: ‘Performance of genetic algorithms in search for water splitting perovskites’, J. Mater. Sci., 2013, 48, 6519–6534
11.
NandiAK., DebK. and DattaS.: ‘Genetic algorithm-based design and development of particle-reinforced silicone rubber for soft tooling process’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 753–760.
12.
ChakrabortiN., DeP. S. and PrasadR.: Z. Metallkd, 1999, 90, 508–513.
13.
MitraK.: ‘Evolutionary surrogate optimization of an industrial sintering process’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 768–775.
14.
ChakrabortiN., DeP. S. and PrasadR.: ‘Genetic algorithms based structure calculations for hydrogenated silicon clusters’, Mater. Lett., 2002, 55, 20–26.
15.
KovacicM., RozejU. and BrezocnikM.: ‘Genetic algorithm rolling mill layout optimization’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 783–787.
16.
SalimiM. and SahebifardM. M.: ‘Optimization of strip profile and flatness using hybrid neural-GA algorithm’, Steel Res. Int., 2010, 81, 154–157.
17.
TancretF.: ‘Computational thermodynamics, Gaussian processes and genetic algorithms: combined tools to design new alloys’, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2013, 21, 045013.
18.
TancretF.: ‘Computational thermodynamics and genetic algorithms to design affordable gamma'-strengthened nickel-iron based superalloys’, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2012, 20, 045012.
19.
SunX. M., ZhaoG. Q., ZhangC. S., GuanY. J. and GaoA. J.: ‘Optimal design of second-step welding chamber for a condenser tube extrusion die based on the response surface method and the genetic algorithm’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 823–834.
20.
CarstensenN. O., DieterichJ. M. and HartkeB.: ‘Design of optimally switchable molecules by genetic algorithms’, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 2903–2910.
21.
CheungT., CheungN., TobarC. M. T., MeiP. R. and GarciaA.: ‘Zone refining of tin: optimization of zone length by a genetic algorithm’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 746–752.
22.
Coello CoelloC. A., Van VeldhuizenD. A. and LamontG. B.: ‘Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems’; 2002, New York, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23.
TutumC. C., DebK. and HattelJ. H.: ‘Multi-criteria optimization in friction stir welding using a thermal model with prescribed material flow’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 816–822.
24.
KumarA., ChakrabartiD. and ChakrabortiN.: ‘Data-driven pareto optimization for microalloyed steels using genetic algorithms’, Steel Res. Int., 2012, 83, 169–174.
25.
BansalA., BarmanA., GhoshS. and ChakrabortiN.: ‘Designing Cu-Zr glass using multiobjective genetic algorithm and evolutionary neural network metamodels-based classical molecular dynamics simulation’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 733–740.
26.
LiY., ChenY. Y., ChenC. Y., ShenC. H., ChengH. W., LoI. H. and ChenC. N.: ‘Device simulation-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for process optimization of semiconductor solar cells’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 761–767.
27.
ZhangQ. and MahfoufM.: ‘A nature-inspired multi-objective optimisation strategy based on a new reduced space searching algorithm for the design of alloy steels’, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 2010, 23, 660–675
28.
DattaS., ZhangQ., SultanaN. and MahfoufM.: ‘Optimal design of titanium alloys for prosthetic applications using a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 741–745.
29.
Yegorov-EgorovI. N., DulikravichG. S. and ColaçoM. J.: ‘Optimizing chemistry of bulk metallic glasses for improved thermal stability’, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2008, 16, 075010.
30.
UlutanD. and OezelT.: ‘Multiobjective optimization of experimental and simulated residual stresses in turning of nickel-alloy IN100’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 835–841.
31.
GujarathiA. M., MotagamwalaA. H. and BabuB. V.: ‘Multiobjective optimization of industrial naphtha cracker for production of ethylene and propylene’, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 2013, 28, 803–810.
32.
PetterssonF., ChakrabortiN. and SaxénH.: ‘A genetic algorithms based multi-objective neural net applied to noisy blast furnace data’, Appl. Soft Comput., 2007, 7, 387–397.
33.
MondalD. N., SarangiK., PetterssonF., K SenP., SaxénH. and ChakrabortiN.: ‘Cu–Zn separation by supported liquid membrane analyzed through multi-objective genetic algorithms’, Hydrometallurgy, 2011, 107, 112–123.
34.
GiriB. K., PetterssonF., SaxénH. and ChakrabortiN.: ‘Genetic programming evolved through bi-objective genetic algorithms applied to a blast furnace’, Mater. Manuf. Processes., 2013, 28, 776–782.
35.
GiriB. K., HakanenJ., MiettinenK. and ChakrabortiN.: ‘Genetic programming through bi-objective genetic algorithms with a study of a simulated moving bed process involving multiple objectives’, Appl. Soft Comput., 2013, 13, 2613–2623.
36.
HaileJ. M.: ‘Molecular dynamics simulation elementary methods’; 2001, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
37.
BhattacharyaB., KumarG. R. D., AgarwalA., ErkoçS., SinghA. and ChakrabortiN.: ‘Analyzing Fe-Zn system using molecular dynamics, evolutionary neural nets and multi-objective genetic algorithms’, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2009, 46, 821–827.
38.
RajakP., TewaryU., DasS., BhattacharyaB. and ChakrabortiN.: ‘Phases in Zn-coated Fe analyzed through an evolutionary meta-model and multi-objective genetic algorithms’, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2011, 50, 2502–2516.
39.
RajakP., GhoshS., BhattacharyaB. and ChakrabortiN.: ‘Pareto-optimal analysis of Zn-coated Fe in the presence of dislocations using genetic algorithms’, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2012, 62, 266–271.