Cryogenic treatment could be useful in preventing AISI H13 steel forging dies from the premature failure that is continuously under the action of mechanical stresses and temperature. This work involves heating H13 steel specimens to 1020°C, quenching in oil followed by double tempering at 520°C for 2 h subsequently undergoing cryogenic treatment at minus185°C for cryosoaking periods starting from 8 to 32 h. Dry sliding wear tests were performed at room temperature on pin-on-disc wear testing machine at 40 N load, 3 m s–1 speed and 6000 m sliding distance. The hardness, carbide density, particle size measurements, and microstructural analysis were carried out. It has been established that reduced carbide particle size due to cryogenic treatment assists in minimizing material flow which was corroborated by decrease in the wear coefficient for H13 steel by 51% as compared to conventional treatment. This outcome was supported by the application of the equation of phase transformation.
TelasangG, MajumdarJD, PadmanabhamG, Surface & coatings technology wear and corrosion behavior of laser surface engineered AISI H13 hot working tool steel. Surf Coat Technol. 2015;261:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.11.058
4.
ChenW, ZhengJ, MengX, Investigation on microstructures and mechanical properties of AlCrN coatings deposited on the surface of plasma nitrocarburized cool- work tool steels. Vaccum. 2015;121:194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.08.021
5.
KatochS, SehgalR, SinghV.Effect of cryogenic treatment on the tribological behavior of H11 hot die steel dry sliding against D3 steel. Tribol – Mater Surf Interf. 2016;10(4):185–195. doi: 10.1080/17515831.2016.1263030
6.
PérezM, BelzunceFJ.The effect of deep cryogenic treatments on the mechanical properties of an AISI H13 steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;624:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.11.051
7.
DhokeyNB, HakeA, KaduS, Influence of cryoprocessing on mechanism of carbide development in cobalt-bearing high-speed steel (M35). Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2014;45(3):1508–1516. doi: 10.1007/s11661-013-2067-2
8.
DasD, RayKK, DuttaAK.Influence of temperature of sub-zero treatments on the wear behavior of die steel. Wear. 2009;267(9–10):1361–1370. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2008.11.029
9.
DasD, KishoreA, KumarK.Sub-zero treatments of AISI D2 steel: part I. Microstruct and Hardness. 2010;527:2182–2193.
10.
MengF.Wear resistance and microstructure of cryogenic treated Fe-1.4Cr-1C bearing steel, Scr. Met Mater. 1994;31:865–868.
11.
YanXG, LiDY.Effects of the sub-zero treatment condition on microstructure, mechanical behavior and wear resistance of W9Mo3Cr4 V high-speed steel. Wear. 2013;302(1–2):854–862. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.037
12.
da SilvaFJ, FrancoSD, MachadoÁR, Performance of cryogenically treated HSS tools. Wear. 2006;261(5–6):674–685. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.017
13.
SinglaAK, SinghJ, SharmaVS.Processing of materials at cryogenic temperature and its implications in manufacturing: a review. Mater Manuf Process. 2018;33(10):1–38.
14.
BabuRSS, RibeiroD.ASM specialty handbook-tool materials. In: Material and surface engineering for precision forging dies; 1999.
15.
KoneshlouM, Meshinchi AslK, KhomamizadehF.Effect of cryogenic treatment on microstructure, mechanical and wear behaviors of AISI H13 hot work tool steel. Cryogenics (Guild). 2011;51(1):55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.11.001
16.
MolinariA, PellizzariM, GialanellaS, Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of tool steels. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;118(1–3):350–355. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00973-6
17.
ChanSK.A microstructure-based fatigue-crack-initiation model. Metall Mater Trans A. 2003;34(1):43–58. doi: 10.1007/s11661-003-0207-9
18.
AtzoriB, MeneghettiG, RicottaM.Unified material parameters based on full compatibility for low-cycle fatigue characterization of as-cast and austempered ductile irons. Int J Fatigue. 2014;68:111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.05.012
19.
FukauraK, YokoyamaY, YokoiD, Fatigue of cold-work tool steels: effect of heat treatment and carbide morphology on fatigue crack formation, life, and fracture surface observations. Metall Mater Trans Physical Metall Mater Sci. 2004;35A(4):1289–1300. doi: 10.1007/s11661-004-0303-5
20.
WeiMX, WangSQ, WangL, Effect of tempering conditions on wear resistance in various wear mechanisms of H13 steel. Tribol Int. 2011;44(7–8):898–905. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2011.03.005
21.
ShindeT, DhokeyNB.Influence of tertiary carbides on improving fatigue limit of H13 die steels. J Metallogr Microstruct Anal.2017;6:398–406. doi: 10.1007/s13632-017-0380-7
22.
MellouliD, HaddarN, KösterA, Hardness effect on thermal fatigue damage of hot-working tool steel. Eng Fail Anal. 2014;45:85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.06.007
23.
ChanKS.Roles of microstructure in fatigue crack initiation. Int J Fatigue. 2010;32:1428–1447. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.10.005
24.
SuhNP.An overview of the delamination theory of wear. Wear. 1977;44(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0043-1648(77)90081-3
25.
FarrahiHGGH.An investigation into the effect of various surface treatments on the fatigue limit of tool steels. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;174:318–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.01.014
26.
RaghvanV.Solid state phase transformations. Prentice Hall of India. 2012: 8–87.
27.
MartinD.Application of Kolmogorov–Johnson–Mehl–Avrami equations to non-isothermal conditions. Comput Mat Sc2010;47:796–800. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.11.005
28.
ChenC, ChengT.Application of Avrami equation to kinetics analysis of fly ash based Linde F (K) zeolite. Asian J Chem. 2013;25(4):1811–1813. doi: 10.14233/ajchem.2013.13156
29.
SuchmannP, JandovaD, RepublicC, Deep cryogenic treatment of H11 hot working tool. J. Achiev. Mater. & Mfg. Engg.2013;49(1):400–408.
