A finite element analysis of crack propagation in an HDPE/CaCo3 composite was carried out using a combination of the extended finite element method (XFEM) and the cohesive zone method (CZM). A unit cell of an entire composite consisting of one particle was chosen as the study zone. The interphase was assumed as a cohesive surface between the matrix and the particle. Variable parameters were the interface adhesion, position of initial crack, volume fraction, and size of the particle. The results showed that, the energy release rate increases when increasing the particle size. Increasing the volume fraction from 5 to 10% has positive effects in decreasing the strain energy release rate; however, the effects of 10 and 15% of volume fraction on the energy release rate are almost the same. Increasing the values of interfacial adhesion strength increases the strength of composite.
NakamuraY, YamaguchiM, KitayamaA, OkuboM and MatsumotoT: ‘Effect of particle size on fracture toughness of epoxy resin filled with angular-shaped silica’, Polymer, 1991, 32, (12), 2221–2229.
2.
RadfordK: ‘The mechanical properties of an epoxy resin with a second phase dispersion’, J. Mater. Sci., 1971, 6, (10), 1286–1291.
3.
LangeF and RadfordK: ‘Fracture energy of an epoxy composite system’, J. Mater. Sci., 1971, 6, (9), 1197–1203.
4.
SinghR, ZhangM and ChanD: ‘Toughening of a brittle thermosetting polymer: effects of reinforcement particle size and volume fraction’, J. Mater. Sci., 2002, 37, (4), 781–788.
5.
GuoT, WangL, ZhangA and CaiT: ‘Effects of nano calcium carbonate modified by a lanthanum compound on the properties of polypropylene’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2005, 97, (3), 1154–1160.
6.
SpanoudakisJ and YoungR: ‘Crack propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin’, J. Mater. Sci., 1984, 19, (2), 473–486.
7.
MoloneyA, KauschH, KaiserT and BeerH: ‘Parameters determining the strength and toughness of particulate filled epoxide resins’, J. Mater. Sci., 1987, 22, (2), 381–393.
8.
WetzelB, RossoP, HaupertF and FriedrichK: ‘Epoxy nanocomposites–fracture and toughening mechanisms’, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2006, 73, (16), 2375–2398.
9.
RomanowiczM: ‘Progressive failure analysis of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers with inhomogeneous interphase and randomly distributed fibers under transverse tensile loading’, Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manufact., 2010, 41, (12), 1829–1838.
10.
MishnaevskyLJr, WeberU and SchmauderS: ‘Numerical analysis of the effect of microstructures of particle-reinforced metallic materials on the crack growth and fracture resistance’, Int. J. Fract., 2004, 125, (1), 33–50.
11.
YuanM, YangY, LiC, HengP and LiL: ‘Numerical analysis of the stress–strain distributions in the particle reinforced metal matrix composite SiC/6064Al’, Mater. Des., 2012, 38, 1–6.
12.
WangW, SadeghipourK and BaranG: ‘Finite element analysis of the effect of an interphase on toughening of a particle-reinforced polymer composite’, Compos. A: Appl. Sci. Manuf., 2008, 39, (6), 956–964.
13.
MishnaevskyL, LippmannN and SchmauderS: ‘Computational modeling of crack propagation in real microstructures of steels and virtual testing of artificially designed materials’, Int. J. Fract., 2003, 120, (4), 581–600.
14.
DolbowJ and BelytschkoT: ‘A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing’, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 1999, 46, 131–150.
15.
BelytschkoT and BlackT: ‘Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing’, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 1999, 45, (5), 601–620.
16.
CampilhoR, BaneaM, ChavesF and SilvaLd: ‘Extended finite element method for fracture characterization of adhesive joints in pure mode I’, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2011, 50, (4), 1543–1549.
17.
CampilhoR, BaneaM, PintoA, Da SilvaL and De JesusA: ‘Strength prediction of single-and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling’, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 2011, 31, (5), 363–372.
18.
YeC, ShiJ and ChengGJ: ‘An extended finite element method (XFEM) study on the effect of reinforcing particles on the crack propagation behavior in a metal–matrix composite’, Int. J. Fatigue, 2012, 44, 151–156.
19.
WangZ, MaL and WuL: ‘Numerical simulation of crack growth through particulate clusters in brittle matrix using the XFEM technique’, Proced. Eng., 2011, 10, 786–791.
20.
HuangJ, SchmauderS, WeberU and GeierS: ‘Micromechanical modelling of the elastoplastic behaviour of nanodispersed elastomer particle-modified PA6’, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2012, 52, (1), 107–111.
21.
MelenkJM and BabuškaI: ‘The partition of unity finite element method: basic theory and applications’, Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 1996, 139, (1), 289–314.
22.
GinerE, SukumarN, TarancónJ and FuenmayorF: ‘An Abaqus implementation of the extended finite element method’, Eng. Fract. Mech., 2009, 76, (3), 347–368.
23.
GallinaD: ‘Finite element prediction of crack formation induced by quenching in a forged valve’, Eng. Fail. Anal., 2011, 18, (8), 2250–2259.
24.
OrificiA, HerszbergI and ThomsonR: ‘Review of methodologies for composite material modelling incorporating failure’, Compos. Struct., 2008, 86, (1), 194–210.
25.
AlfanoG: ‘On the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models’, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2006, 66, (6), 723–730.
26.
LoehnertS, PrangeC and WriggersP: ‘Error controlled adaptive multiscale XFEM simulation of cracks’, Int. J. Fract., 2012, 178, (1–2), 147–156.
27.
FriesTP, ByfutA, AlizadaA, ChengKW and SchröderA: ‘Hanging nodes and XFEM’, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 2011, 86, (4–5), 404–430.
PanetierJ, LadevèzeP and ChamoinL: ‘Strict and effective bounds in goal-oriented error estimation applied to fracture mechanics problems solved with XFEM’, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 2010, 81, (6), 671–700.
30.
NormanDA and RobertsonRE: ‘Rigid-particle toughening of glassy polymers’, Polymer, 2003, 44, (8), 2351–2362.
31.
NatarajanS, KerfridenP, MahapatraDR and BordasS: ‘Numerical analysis of the inclusion-crack interaction by the extended finite element method’, Int. J. Comput. Meth. Eng. Sci. Mech., 2014, 15, (1), 26–32.
