The fracture toughness properties, in terms of stress intensity factor KIc and strain energy release rate GIc, of hemp fibre mat-reinforced sheet moulding compound (H-SMC) are measured using the compact tension (CT) method and compared with those of glass fibre-reinforced SMC (G-SMC). Three material parameters were considered for composite optimisation: fibre volume fraction, CaCO3 filler content and hemp fibre surface treatments using either alkaline, silane or a combination of these two treatments. The highest fracture toughness for H-SMC composites was obtained at a fibre loading of around 30 vol.-%, while it was also shown that the fracture toughness properties of H-SMC are sensitive to mineral filler content. Surface treatment of the hemp fibres using a combined alkaline-silane treatment resulted in a significant improvement in fracture toughness of H-SMC composites. Optimised H-SMC composites exhibited fracture toughness properties similar to those of G-SMC at fibre contents of 20 vol.-%, with KIc values of around 6 MPa.m−1/2.
PatelHK, RenG, HoggPJ, Hemp fibre as alternative to glass fibre in sheet moulding compound part 1–influence of fibre content and surface treatment on mechanical properties. Plast Rubber Compos. 2010;39(6):268–276. doi: 10.1179/174328910X12647080902853
6.
PatelH, RenG, HoggPJ, Hemp fibre as alternative to glass fibre in sheet moulding compound. part 2 – impact properties. Plast Rubber Compos. 2015;44(7):291–298. doi: 10.1179/1743289815Y.0000000030
7.
ThanomsilpC, Cauchi-SavonaS, PeijsT, Use of rice husk powder as a substitute for CaCO3 in thermoset-based molding compounds. J Biobased Mater Bio. 2007;1(1):87–93.
8.
BledzkiAK, GassanJ.Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres. Prog Polym Sci. 1999;24(2):221–274. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5
9.
PeijsT.Natural fiber based composites. Mater Technol. 2000;15(4):281–285. doi: 10.1080/10667857.2000.11752892
10.
HolberyJ, HoustonD.Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. JOM J Miner Metal Mater Soc. 2006;58(11):80–86. doi: 10.1007/s11837-006-0234-2
11.
BerglundLA, PeijsT.Cellulose biocomposites – from bulk moldings to nanostructured systems. MRS Bull. 2010;35(03):201–207. doi: 10.1557/mrs2010.652
12.
SummerscalesJ, DissanayakeN, VirkA, A review of bast fibres and their composites. Part 2 – composites. Compos A Appl S. 2010;41(10):1336–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.020
13.
GeorgeJ, SreekalaMS, ThomasS.A review on interface modification and characterization of natural fiber reinforced plastic composites. Polym Eng Sci. 2001;41(9):1471–1485. doi: 10.1002/pen.10846
14.
ZafeiropoulosNE, editor. Interface engineering of natural fibre composites for maximum performance. Cambridge (UK): Woodhead Publishing Ltd.; 2011.
15.
StamboulisA, BaillieCA, GarkhailSK, Environmental durability of flax fibres and their composites based on polypropylene matrix. Appl Compos Mater. 2000;7(5):273–294. doi: 10.1023/A:1026581922221
16.
DhakalHN, ZhangZY, RichardsonMO.Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67(7):1674–1683. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.019
17.
HapuarachchiTD, RenG, FanM, Fire retardancy of natural fibre reinforced sheet moulding compound. Appl Compos Mater. 2007;14(4):251–264. doi: 10.1007/s10443-007-9044-0
18.
KozłowskiR, Władyka-PrzybylakM.Flammability and fire resistance of composites reinforced by natural fibers. Polym Advan Technol. 2008;19(6):446–453. doi: 10.1002/pat.1135
19.
WambuaP, IvensJ, VerpoestI.Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics?Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(9):1259–1264. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4
20.
AzizSH, AnsellMP.The effect of alkalization and fibre alignment on the mechanical and thermal properties of kenaf and hemp bast fibre composites: part 1 – polyester resin matrix. Compos Sci Technol. 2004;64(9):1219–1230. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.001
21.
SingletonAC, BaillieCA, BeaumontPW, On the mechanical properties, deformation and fracture of a natural fibre/recycled polymer composite. Compos B Eng. 2003;34(6):519–526. doi: 10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00042-8
RoutJ, MisraM, TripathySS, The influence of fibre treatment on the performance of coir-polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61(9):1303–1310. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00021-5
24.
MishraS, MohantyAK, DrzalLT, Studies on mechanical performance of biofibre/glass reinforced polyester hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2003;63(10):1377–1385. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-8
25.
GeersMG, PeijsT, BrekelmansWA, Experimental monitoring of strain localization and failure behaviour of composite materials. Compos Sci Technol. 1996;56(11):1283–1290. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00088-7
GoutianosS, ArévaloR, SørensenBF, Effect of processing conditions on fracture resistance and cohesive laws of binderfree all-cellulose composites. Appl Compos Mater. 2014;21(6):805–825. doi: 10.1007/s10443-013-9381-0
28.
HughesM, HillCA, HagueJR.The fracture toughness of bast fibre reinforced polyester composites part 1 evaluation and analysis. J Mater Sci. 2002;37(21):4669–4676. doi: 10.1023/A:1020621020862
29.
LiuQ, HughesM.The fracture behaviour and toughness of woven flax fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Compos A Appl S. 2008;39(10):1644–1652. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.008
KinlochAJ, YoungRJ, editors. Fracture behaviour of polymers. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media; 1995.
36.
MaxwellD, YoungRJ, KinlochAJ.Hybrid particulate-filled epoxy-polymers. J Mater Sci Lett. 1984;3(1):9–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00720061
37.
IslamMS, PickeringKL, ForemanNJ.Influence of alkali fiber treatment and fiber processing on the mechanical properties of hemp/epoxy composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;119(6):3696–3707. doi: 10.1002/app.31335
38.
MukherjeeA, GangulyPK, SurD.Structural mechanics of jute: the effects of hemicellulose or lignin removal. J Text I. 1993;84(3):348–353. doi: 10.1080/00405009308658967
